BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

486 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25395014)

  • 1. Evaluation of an integrated clinical workflow for targeted next-generation sequencing of low-quality tumor DNA using a 51-gene enrichment panel.
    Choudhary A; Mambo E; Sanford T; Boedigheimer M; Twomey B; Califano J; Hadd A; Oliner KS; Beaudenon S; Latham GJ; Adai AT
    BMC Med Genomics; 2014 Nov; 7():62. PubMed ID: 25395014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Next-Generation Sequencing Workflow for NSCLC Critical Samples Using a Targeted Sequencing Approach by Ion Torrent PGM™ Platform.
    Vanni I; Coco S; Truini A; Rusmini M; Dal Bello MG; Alama A; Banelli B; Mora M; Rijavec E; Barletta G; Genova C; Biello F; Maggioni C; Grossi F
    Int J Mol Sci; 2015 Dec; 16(12):28765-82. PubMed ID: 26633390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development and validation of an ultra-high sensitive next-generation sequencing assay for molecular diagnosis of clinical oncology.
    Liang J; She Y; Zhu J; Wei L; Zhang L; Gao L; Wang Y; Xing J; Guo Y; Meng X; Li P
    Int J Oncol; 2016 Nov; 49(5):2088-2104. PubMed ID: 27826616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Targeted, high-depth, next-generation sequencing of cancer genes in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded and fine-needle aspiration tumor specimens.
    Hadd AG; Houghton J; Choudhary A; Sah S; Chen L; Marko AC; Sanford T; Buddavarapu K; Krosting J; Garmire L; Wylie D; Shinde R; Beaudenon S; Alexander EK; Mambo E; Adai AT; Latham GJ
    J Mol Diagn; 2013 Mar; 15(2):234-47. PubMed ID: 23321017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Towards a Next-Generation Sequencing Diagnostic Service for Tumour Genotyping: A Comparison of Panels and Platforms.
    Burghel GJ; Hurst CD; Watson CM; Chambers PA; Dickinson H; Roberts P; Knowles MA
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():478017. PubMed ID: 26351634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF hotspot mutations detection for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer using direct DNA pipetting in a fully-automated platform and Next-Generation Sequencing for laboratory workflow optimisation.
    Gilson P; Franczak C; Dubouis L; Husson M; Rouyer M; Demange J; Perceau M; Leroux A; Merlin JL; Harlé A
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219204. PubMed ID: 31265477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Versatile ion S5XL sequencer for targeted next generation sequencing of solid tumors in a clinical laboratory.
    Mehrotra M; Duose DY; Singh RR; Barkoh BA; Manekia J; Harmon MA; Patel KP; Routbort MJ; Medeiros LJ; Wistuba II; Luthra R
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0181968. PubMed ID: 28767674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Whole exome sequencing (WES) on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST).
    Astolfi A; Urbini M; Indio V; Nannini M; Genovese CG; Santini D; Saponara M; Mandrioli A; Ercolani G; Brandi G; Biasco G; Pantaleo MA
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Nov; 16():892. PubMed ID: 26531060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Targeted Next Generation Sequencing as a Reliable Diagnostic Assay for the Detection of Somatic Mutations in Tumours Using Minimal DNA Amounts from Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded Material.
    de Leng WW; Gadellaa-van Hooijdonk CG; Barendregt-Smouter FA; Koudijs MJ; Nijman I; Hinrichs JW; Cuppen E; van Lieshout S; Loberg RD; de Jonge M; Voest EE; de Weger RA; Steeghs N; Langenberg MH; Sleijfer S; Willems SM; Lolkema MP
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149405. PubMed ID: 26919633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of OncoPanel: A Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Assay for the Detection of Somatic Variants in Cancer.
    Garcia EP; Minkovsky A; Jia Y; Ducar MD; Shivdasani P; Gong X; Ligon AH; Sholl LM; Kuo FC; MacConaill LE; Lindeman NI; Dong F
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2017 Jun; 141(6):751-758. PubMed ID: 28557599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Profiling cancer gene mutations in clinical formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded colorectal tumor specimens using targeted next-generation sequencing.
    Zhang L; Chen L; Sah S; Latham GJ; Patel R; Song Q; Koeppen H; Tam R; Schleifman E; Mashhedi H; Chalasani S; Fu L; Sumiyoshi T; Raja R; Forrest W; Hampton GM; Lackner MR; Hegde P; Jia S
    Oncologist; 2014 Apr; 19(4):336-43. PubMed ID: 24664487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integration of Wet and Dry Bench Processes Optimizes Targeted Next-generation Sequencing of Low-quality and Low-quantity Tumor Biopsies.
    Houghton J; Hadd AG; Zeigler R; Haynes BC; Latham GJ
    J Vis Exp; 2016 Apr; (110):e53836. PubMed ID: 27166994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality control material for the detection of somatic mutations in fixed clinical specimens by next-generation sequencing.
    Dumur CI; Almenara JA; Powers CN; Ferreira-Gonzalez A
    Diagn Pathol; 2015 Sep; 10():169. PubMed ID: 26376646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of Factors Affecting the Success of Next-Generation Sequencing Testing in Solid Tumors.
    Goswami RS; Luthra R; Singh RR; Patel KP; Routbort MJ; Aldape KD; Yao H; Dang HD; Barkoh BA; Manekia J; Medeiros LJ; Roy-Chowdhuri S; Stewart J; Broaddus RR; Chen H
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2016 Feb; 145(2):222-37. PubMed ID: 27124905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tissue recommendations for precision cancer therapy using next generation sequencing: a comprehensive single cancer center's experiences.
    Cho M; Ahn S; Hong M; Bang H; Van Vrancken M; Kim S; Lee J; Park SH; Park JO; Park YS; Lim HY; Kang WK; Sun JM; Lee SH; Ahn MJ; Park K; Kim DH; Lee S; Park W; Kim KM
    Oncotarget; 2017 Jun; 8(26):42478-42486. PubMed ID: 28477007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of the Oncomine
    Williams HL; Walsh K; Diamond A; Oniscu A; Deans ZC
    Virchows Arch; 2018 Oct; 473(4):489-503. PubMed ID: 30105577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The reliable assurance of detecting somatic mutations in cancer-related genes by next-generation sequencing: the results of external quality assessment in China.
    Zhang R; Ding J; Han Y; Yi L; Xie J; Yang X; Fan G; Wang G; Hao M; Zhang D; Zhang K; Lin G; Li J
    Oncotarget; 2016 Sep; 7(36):58500-58515. PubMed ID: 27542269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of two highly-multiplexed custom panels for massively parallel semiconductor sequencing on paraffin DNA.
    Kotoula V; Lyberopoulou A; Papadopoulou K; Charalambous E; Alexopoulou Z; Gakou C; Lakis S; Tsolaki E; Lilakos K; Fountzilas G
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0128818. PubMed ID: 26039550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. DNA qualification workflow for next generation sequencing of histopathological samples.
    Simbolo M; Gottardi M; Corbo V; Fassan M; Mafficini A; Malpeli G; Lawlor RT; Scarpa A
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e62692. PubMed ID: 23762227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing Pipeline Outperforms a Combined Approach Using Sanger Sequencing and Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification in Targeted Gene Panel Analysis.
    Schenkel LC; Kerkhof J; Stuart A; Reilly J; Eng B; Woodside C; Levstik A; Howlett CJ; Rupar AC; Knoll JHM; Ainsworth P; Waye JS; Sadikovic B
    J Mol Diagn; 2016 Sep; 18(5):657-667. PubMed ID: 27376475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.