These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25395354)

  • 21. Fragrance series testing in eyelid dermatitis.
    Wenk KS; Ehrlich A
    Dermatitis; 2012; 23(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 22653065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Diagnostic workup of fragrance allergy].
    Geier J; Uter W
    Hautarzt; 2015 Sep; 66(9):674-9. PubMed ID: 26253114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Patch test results with patients' own perfumes, deodorants and shaving lotions: results of the IVDK 1998-2002.
    Uter W; Geier J; Schnuch A; Frosch PJ
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2007 Mar; 21(3):374-9. PubMed ID: 17309462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Very late reactions in the patch test with fragrance mix I and oak moss absolute (Evernia prunastri, INCI): Data of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK).
    Schubert S; Schnuch A; Bauer A; Wagner N; Schröder-Kraft C; Dickel H; Weisshaar E; Effendy I; Becker D; Buhl T; Simon D; Koch A; Kreft B; Vieluf D; Löffler H; Geier J
    Contact Dermatitis; 2022 Jan; 86(1):54-57. PubMed ID: 34515343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A liquid chromatography-mass spectrometric method for the determination of oak moss allergens atranol and chloroatranol in perfumes.
    Bossi R; Rastogi SC; Bernard G; Gimenez-Arnau E; Johansen JD; Lepoittevin JP; Menné T
    J Sep Sci; 2004 May; 27(7-8):537-40. PubMed ID: 15335036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Selected oxidized fragrance terpenes are common contact allergens.
    Matura M; Sköld M; Börje A; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Frosch P; Goossens A; Johansen JD; Svedman C; White IR; Karlberg AT
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jun; 52(6):320-8. PubMed ID: 15932583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [How common is fragrance allergy really?].
    Geier J; Brans R
    Hautarzt; 2020 Mar; 71(3):197-204. PubMed ID: 31965209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. How to test for fragrance allergy.
    Larsen WG
    Cutis; 2000 Jan; 65(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 10664875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Baseline series fragrance markers fail to predict contact allergy.
    Mann J; McFadden JP; White JM; White IR; Banerjee P
    Contact Dermatitis; 2014 May; 70(5):276-81. PubMed ID: 24731084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Allergy to lichen acids in a fragrance.
    Rademaker M
    Australas J Dermatol; 2000 Feb; 41(1):50-1. PubMed ID: 10715903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Categorization of fragrance contact allergens for prioritization of preventive measures: clinical and experimental data and consideration of structure-activity relationships.
    Uter W; Johansen JD; Börje A; Karlberg AT; Lidén C; Rastogi S; Roberts D; White IR
    Contact Dermatitis; 2013 Oct; 69(4):196-230. PubMed ID: 23889298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The fragrance hand immersion study - an experimental model simulating real-life exposure for allergic contact dermatitis on the hands.
    Heydorn S; Menné T; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Svedman C; Basketter D; Johansen JD
    Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Jun; 48(6):324-30. PubMed ID: 14531871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quantitative patch and repeated open application testing in hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde sensitive-patients.
    Schnuch A; Uter W; Dickel H; Szliska C; Schliemann S; Eben R; Ruëff F; Gimenez-Arnau A; Löffler H; Aberer W; Frambach Y; Worm M; Niebuhr M; Hillen U; Martin V; Jappe U; Frosch PJ; Mahler V
    Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Sep; 61(3):152-62. PubMed ID: 19780773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from lichens in present-day Finland.
    Aalto-Korte K; Lauerma A; Alanko K
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jan; 52(1):36-8. PubMed ID: 15701128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Contact allergy to fragrances: frequencies of sensitization from 1996 to 2002. Results of the IVDK*.
    Schnuch A; Lessmann H; Geier J; Frosch PJ; Uter W;
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Feb; 50(2):65-76. PubMed ID: 15128316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fragrance contact allergens in 5588 cosmetic products identified through a novel smartphone application.
    Bennike NH; Oturai NB; Müller S; Kirkeby CS; Jørgensen C; Christensen AB; Zachariae C; Johansen JD
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2018 Jan; 32(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 28796916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Patch test concentrations (doses in mg/cm2 ) for the 12 non-mix fragrance substances regulated by European legislation.
    Bruze M; Svedman C; Andersen KE; Bruynzeel D; Goossens A; Johansen JD; Matura M; Orton D; Vigan M;
    Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Mar; 66(3):131-6. PubMed ID: 22320667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by hydroperoxides of limonene and dose-response relationship-A repeated open application test (ROAT) study.
    Bennike NH; Palangi L; Christensson JB; Nilsson U; Zachariae C; Johansen JD; Hagvall L
    Contact Dermatitis; 2019 Apr; 80(4):208-216. PubMed ID: 30378136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Nickel allergy: relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds.
    Fischer LA; Johansen JD; Menné T
    Br J Dermatol; 2007 Oct; 157(4):723-9. PubMed ID: 17634081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Contact sensitization to fragrances other than fragrance mix I in China.
    Liu J; Li LF
    Contact Dermatitis; 2015 Oct; 73(4):252-3. PubMed ID: 26094488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.