These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25395770)

  • 1. Why WITS? Why not a way beyond?
    Nagar S; Nagar R; Raghav P
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2014 Oct; 5(4):518-23. PubMed ID: 25395770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of occlusal plane inclination on ANB and Wits assessments of anteroposterior jaw relationships.
    Del Santo M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):641-8. PubMed ID: 16679204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The "Wits" appraisal of jaw disharmony.
    Jacobson A
    Am J Orthod; 1975 Feb; 67(2):125-38. PubMed ID: 1054214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Study between anb angle and Wits appraisal in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
    Zamora N; Cibrián R; Gandia JL; Paredes V
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2013 Jul; 18(4):e725-32. PubMed ID: 23722136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of functional versus bisected occlusal planes on the Wits appraisal.
    Thayer TA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 May; 97(5):422-6. PubMed ID: 2333856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The wits appraisal using three reference planes and its interaction with the ANB angle among a sub-set of Nigerians".
    Ifesanya JU; Adeyemi AT; Otuyemi OD
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2014 Sep; 43(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 26223140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of Palatal Plane and Occlusal Plane for Determining Anteroposterior Jaw Relation.
    Pyakurel U; Thapaliya KB; Singh K; Gupta A; Gupta S; Bajracharya M; Shrestha RM; Mishra P
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2019; 57(215):3-7. PubMed ID: 31080237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of factors affecting angle ANB.
    Hussels W; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod; 1984 May; 85(5):411-23. PubMed ID: 6586080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of linear and angular measurements of maxillo-mandibular anteroposterior discrepancies.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Miani A; Tartaglia GM
    Clin Orthod Res; 1999 Feb; 2(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 10534977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A cross-sectional analysis of Wits and Riedel in adults with skeletal III malocclusion: How informative are they?
    Oliver GR; Grimes K; Pandis N; Fleming PS
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2018 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 29624856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Properties of the ANB angle and the Wits appraisal in the skeletal estimation of Angle's Class III patients.
    Iwasaki H; Ishikawa H; Chowdhury L; Nakamura S; Iida J
    Eur J Orthod; 2002 Oct; 24(5):477-83. PubMed ID: 12407943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical application of a method to correct angle ANB for geometric effects.
    Hussels W; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Dec; 92(6):506-10. PubMed ID: 3479897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation of Dental and Skeletal Malocclusions in Sagittal Plane among Saudi Orthodontic Patients.
    Al-Hamlan N; Al-Eissa B; Al-Hiyasat AS; Albalawi FS; Ahmed AE
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 May; 16(5):353-9. PubMed ID: 26162253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative assessment of sagittal skeletal discrepancy: a cephalometric study.
    Aparna P; Kumar DN; Prasad M; Shamnur N; G AK; K R S; B R GK; Gupta N
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Apr; 9(4):ZC38-41. PubMed ID: 26023641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The AS/BS occlusal angle, a replacement for the ANB angle].
    Demisch A; Hügli R
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1977 Nov; 87(11):1155-69. PubMed ID: 271358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cephalometric and in vivo measurements of maxillomandibular anteroposterior discrepancies: a preliminary regression study.
    Ferrario VF; Serrao G; Ciusa V; Morini M; Sforza C
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Dec; 72(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 12518952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Geometric influence of the sagittal and vertical apical base relationship on the ANB angle.
    Sadat-Khonsari R; Dathe H; Knösel M; Hahn W; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Bauss O
    J Orofac Orthop; 2009 Mar; 70(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 19322533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment and predictability of ANB angle.
    Chandra PK; Godfrey K
    Aust Orthod J; 1990 Mar; 11(3):173-7. PubMed ID: 2152434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The discriminatory force of 3 sagittal measurement relations of the jaw bases].
    Gebauer U; Demisch A; Madone G
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1978 Oct; 88(10):1070-84. PubMed ID: 280950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Reliability evaluation for thirteen parameters describing anteroposterior apical base relationship in Angle Class II division 1 patients].
    Liu DX; Zhang L; Wang CL; Zhang XY; Guo J
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Aug; 24(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 16999351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.