These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25395812)

  • 21. Dynamic CT myocardial perfusion measurements of resting and hyperaemic blood flow in low-risk subjects with 128-slice dual-source CT.
    Ho KT; Ong HY; Tan G; Yong QW
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Mar; 16(3):300-6. PubMed ID: 25378472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An efficient polyenergetic SART (pSART) reconstruction algorithm for quantitative myocardial CT perfusion.
    Lin Y; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021911. PubMed ID: 24506632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Patient motion effects on the quantification of regional myocardial blood flow with dynamic PET imaging.
    Hunter CR; Klein R; Beanlands RS; deKemp RA
    Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1829. PubMed ID: 27036580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Spectrotemporal CT data acquisition and reconstruction at low dose.
    Clark DP; Lee CL; Kirsch DG; Badea CT
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6317-36. PubMed ID: 26520724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Myocardial CT perfusion imaging in a large animal model: comparison of dynamic versus single-phase acquisitions.
    Schwarz F; Hinkel R; Baloch E; Marcus RP; Hildebrandt K; Sandner TA; Kupatt C; Hoffmann V; Wintersperger BJ; Reiser MF; Theisen D; Nikolaou K; Bamberg F
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Dec; 6(12):1229-38. PubMed ID: 24269264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dynamic Myocardial Perfusion in a Porcine Balloon-induced Ischemia Model using a Prototype Spectral Detector CT.
    Fahmi R; Eck BL; Fares A; Levi J; Wu H; Vembar M; Dhanantwari A; Bezerra HG; Wilson DL
    Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2015 Feb; 9417():. PubMed ID: 31942087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dose Reduction of Dynamic Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging by Tube Voltage Change: Investigation in a Swine Model.
    Geng W; Gao Y; Zhao N; Yan H; Ma W; An Y; Jia L; Lu B
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2022; 9():823974. PubMed ID: 35310988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quantitative evaluation of regional myocardial perfusion using fast X-ray computed tomography.
    Schmermund A; Bell MR; Lerman LO; Ritman EL; Rumberger JA
    Herz; 1997 Feb; 22(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 9088938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Optimization of imaging protocols for myocardial blood flow (MBF) quantification with
    Wiyaporn K; Tocharoenchai C; Pusuwan P; Higuchi T; Fung GSK; Feng T; Park MJ; Tsui BMW
    Phys Med; 2017 Oct; 42():127-134. PubMed ID: 29173905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Myocardial Coverage and Radiation Dose in Dynamic Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using Third-Generation Dual-Source CT.
    Takafuji M; Kitagawa K; Ishida M; Goto Y; Nakamura S; Nagasawa N; Sakuma H
    Korean J Radiol; 2020 Jan; 21(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 31920029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Development and validation of a segmentation-free polyenergetic algorithm for dynamic perfusion computed tomography.
    Lin Y; Samei E
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2016 Jul; 3(3):033503. PubMed ID: 27610396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Kinetic model-based factor analysis of dynamic sequences for 82-rubidium cardiac positron emission tomography.
    Klein R; Beanlands RS; Wassenaar RW; Thorn SL; Lamoureux M; DaSilva JN; Adler A; deKemp RA
    Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):3995-4010. PubMed ID: 20879561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Intermodel disagreement of myocardial blood flow estimation from dynamic CT perfusion imaging.
    van Assen M; Pelgrim GJ; De Cecco CN; Stijnen JMA; Zaki BM; Oudkerk M; Vliegenthart R; Schoepf UJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jan; 110():175-180. PubMed ID: 30599857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A Multimodality Myocardial Perfusion Phantom: Initial Quantitative Imaging Results.
    Kamphuis ME; Kuipers H; Liefers HR; van Es J; Simonis FFJ; Greuter MJW; Slump CH; Slart RHJA
    Bioengineering (Basel); 2022 Sep; 9(9):. PubMed ID: 36134982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Patient-based 4D digital breast phantom for perfusion contrast-enhanced breast CT imaging.
    Caballo M; Mann R; Sechopoulos I
    Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4448-4460. PubMed ID: 30151857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Stress and rest dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging by evaluation of complete time-attenuation curves with dual-source CT.
    Ho KT; Chua KC; Klotz E; Panknin C
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Aug; 3(8):811-20. PubMed ID: 20705260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An iterative method for tomographic x-ray perfusion estimation in a decomposition model-based approach.
    Neukirchen C; Giordano M; Wiesner S
    Med Phys; 2010 Dec; 37(12):6125-41. PubMed ID: 21302769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Absolute Versus Relative Myocardial Blood Flow by Dynamic CT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients With Anatomic Coronary Artery Disease.
    Wichmann JL; Meinel FG; Schoepf UJ; Lo GG; Choe YH; Wang Y; Vliegenthart R; Varga-Szemes A; Muscogiuri G; Cannaò PM; De Cecco CN
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jul; 205(1):W67-72. PubMed ID: 26102420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Image quality of mean temporal arterial and mean temporal portal venous phase images calculated from low dose dynamic volume perfusion CT datasets in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and pancreatic cancer.
    Wang X; Henzler T; Gawlitza J; Diehl S; Wilhelm T; Schoenberg SO; Jin ZY; Xue HD; Smakic A
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 85(11):2104-2110. PubMed ID: 27776665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Low-dose quantitative myocardial blood flow imaging using 15O-water and PET without attenuation correction.
    Lubberink M; Harms HJ; Halbmeijer R; de Haan S; Knaapen P; Lammertsma AA
    J Nucl Med; 2010 Apr; 51(4):575-80. PubMed ID: 20237035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.