These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25397360)

  • 1. Reanalysis and semantic persistence in native and non-native garden-path recovery.
    Jacob G; Felser C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):907-25. PubMed ID: 25397360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is children's reading "good enough"? Links between online processing and comprehension as children read syntactically ambiguous sentences.
    Wonnacott E; Joseph HS; Adelman JS; Nation K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):855-79. PubMed ID: 25774745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Semantic re-interpretation and garden path recovery.
    Sturt P
    Cognition; 2007 Nov; 105(2):477-88. PubMed ID: 17178115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Plausibility and structural reanalysis in L1 and L2 sentence comprehension.
    Lee J; Witzel J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Feb; 76(2):319-337. PubMed ID: 35319306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Native and non-native reading of sentences: an fMRI experiment.
    Rüschemeyer SA; Zysset S; Friederici AD
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):354-65. PubMed ID: 16427323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What is it that lingers? Garden-path (mis)interpretations in younger and older adults.
    Malyutina S; den Ouden DB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):880-906. PubMed ID: 25920901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bilinguals on the garden-path: Individual differences in syntactic ambiguity resolution.
    Brothers T; Hoversten LJ; Traxler MJ
    Biling (Camb Engl); 2021 Aug; 24(4):612-627. PubMed ID: 35669170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Single-Stage Prediction Models Do Not Explain the Magnitude of Syntactic Disambiguation Difficulty.
    van Schijndel M; Linzen T
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Jun; 45(6):e12988. PubMed ID: 34170031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating the True Cost of Garden Pathing: A Computational Model of Latent Cognitive Processes.
    Paape D; Vasishth S
    Cogn Sci; 2022 Aug; 46(8):e13186. PubMed ID: 35986666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural correlates of early-closure garden-path processing: Effects of prosody and plausibility.
    den Ouden DB; Dickey MW; Anderson C; Christianson K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):926-49. PubMed ID: 25801097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benchmark eye movement effects during natural reading in autism spectrum disorder.
    Howard PL; Liversedge SP; Benson V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jan; 43(1):109-127. PubMed ID: 27504678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Syntactic reconstruction and reanalysis, semantic dead ends, and prefrontal cortex.
    Christensen KR
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Jun; 73(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 20236747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Task Sensitivity in L2 English Speakers' Syntactic Processing: Evidence for Good-Enough Processing in Self-Paced Reading.
    Tan M; Foltz A
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():575847. PubMed ID: 33041947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Why reread? Evidence from garden-path and local coherence structures.
    Christianson K; Luke SG; Hussey EK; Wochna KL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jul; 70(7):1380-1405. PubMed ID: 27150840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The time course of semantic and syntactic processing in Chinese sentence comprehension: evidence from eye movements.
    Yang J; Wang S; Chen HC; Rayner K
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Dec; 37(8):1164-76. PubMed ID: 19933459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does the speaker matter? Online processing of semantic and pragmatic information in L2 speech comprehension.
    Foucart A; Garcia X; Ayguasanosa M; Thierry G; Martin C; Costa A
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():291-303. PubMed ID: 26115602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frequency-based Segregation of Syntactic and Semantic Unification during Online Sentence Level Language Comprehension.
    Bastiaansen M; Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Nov; 27(11):2095-107. PubMed ID: 26042498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading.
    Ferreira F; Henderson JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Jul; 16(4):555-68. PubMed ID: 2142952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lexical mediation and context effects in sentence processing.
    Traxler MJ; Tooley KM
    Brain Res; 2007 May; 1146():59-74. PubMed ID: 17112486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.