168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25398619)
1. Differences in price elasticities of demand for health insurance: a systematic review.
Pendzialek JB; Simic D; Stock S
Eur J Health Econ; 2016 Jan; 17(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 25398619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Consumer price sensitivity in Dutch health insurance.
van Dijk M; Pomp M; Douven R; Laske-Aldershof T; Schut E; de Boer W; de Boo A
Int J Health Care Finance Econ; 2008 Dec; 8(4):225-44. PubMed ID: 18709549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Price elasticities in the German Statutory Health Insurance market before and after the health care reform of 2009.
Pendzialek JB; Danner M; Simic D; Stock S
Health Policy; 2015 May; 119(5):654-63. PubMed ID: 25670009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Managed competition and consumer price sensitivity in social health insurance.
Schut FT; Hassink WH
J Health Econ; 2002 Nov; 21(6):1009-29. PubMed ID: 12475123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Price and the demand for nongroup health insurance.
Auerbach D; Ohri S
Inquiry; 2006; 43(2):122-34. PubMed ID: 17004642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Switching gains and health plan price elasticities: 20 years of managed competition reforms in The Netherlands.
Douven R; Katona K; T Schut F; Shestalova V
Eur J Health Econ; 2017 Nov; 18(8):1047-1064. PubMed ID: 28243775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Consumer price sensitivity and social health insurer choice in Germany and The Netherlands.
Schut FT; Gress S; Wasem J
Int J Health Care Finance Econ; 2003 Jun; 3(2):117-38. PubMed ID: 14626009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Demand for private health insurance in Chinese urban areas.
Ying XH; Hu TW; Ren J; Chen W; Xu K; Huang JH
Health Econ; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1041-50. PubMed ID: 17199233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. New estimates of elasticity of demand for healthcare in rural China.
Zhou Z; Su Y; Gao J; Xu L; Zhang Y
Health Policy; 2011 Dec; 103(2-3):255-65. PubMed ID: 22014842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. China's medical savings accounts: an analysis of the price elasticity of demand for health care.
Yu H
Eur J Health Econ; 2017 Jul; 18(6):773-785. PubMed ID: 27650358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Switching health insurers: the role of price, quality and consumer information search.
Boonen LH; Laske-Aldershof T; Schut FT
Eur J Health Econ; 2016 Apr; 17(3):339-53. PubMed ID: 25820635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Switching costs, price sensitivity and health plan choice.
Strombom BA; Buchmueller TC; Feldstein PJ
J Health Econ; 2002 Jan; 21(1):89-116. PubMed ID: 11845927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Subsidies and the demand for individual health insurance in California.
Marquis MS; Buntin MB; Escarce JJ; Kapur K; Yegian JM
Health Serv Res; 2004 Oct; 39(5):1547-70. PubMed ID: 15333122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of premiums on the decision to participate in health insurance and other fringe benefits offered by the employer: evidence from a real-world experiment.
Royalty AB; Hagens J
J Health Econ; 2005 Jan; 24(1):95-112. PubMed ID: 15617790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The price sensitivity of Medicare beneficiaries: a regression discontinuity approach.
Buchmueller TC; Grazier K; Hirth RA; Okeke EN
Health Econ; 2013 Jan; 22(1):35-51. PubMed ID: 22278904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What should be the basis for compulsory and optional health insurance premiums? Opinions of Swiss doctors.
Jannot AS; Perneger TV
Swiss Med Wkly; 2014 Feb; 144():w13918. PubMed ID: 24496851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tax incentives as a solution to the uninsured: evidence from the self-employed.
Gumus G; Regan TL
Inquiry; 2013 Nov; 50(4):275-95. PubMed ID: 24996752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Workers on the margin: who drops health coverage when prices rise?
Okeke EN; Hirth RA; Grazier K
Inquiry; 2010; 47(1):33-47. PubMed ID: 20464953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pricing behaviour of nonprofit insurers in a weakly competitive social health insurance market.
Douven RC; Schut FT
J Health Econ; 2011 Mar; 30(2):439-49. PubMed ID: 21295365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is the medical loss ratio a good target measure for regulation in the individual market for health insurance?
Karaca-Mandic P; Abraham JM; Simon K
Health Econ; 2015 Jan; 24(1):55-74. PubMed ID: 24123608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
