211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25399634)
1. Mate-sampling costs and sexy sons.
Kokko H; Booksmythe I; Jennions MD
J Evol Biol; 2015 Jan; 28(1):259-66. PubMed ID: 25399634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term persistence of exaggerated ornaments under Fisherian runaway despite costly mate search.
Waffender A; Henshaw JM
J Evol Biol; 2023 Jan; 36(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 36514848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The evolution of mating preferences for genetic attractiveness and quality in the presence of sensory bias.
Henshaw JM; Fromhage L; Jones AG
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Aug; 119(33):e2206262119. PubMed ID: 35939704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Female mate preferences in Drosophila simulans: evolution and costs.
Sharma MD; Tregenza T; Hosken DJ
J Evol Biol; 2010 Aug; 23(8):1672-9. PubMed ID: 20546089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Male versus female mate choice: sexual selection and the evolution of species recognition via reinforcement.
Servedio MR
Evolution; 2007 Dec; 61(12):2772-89. PubMed ID: 17924955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The costs of choice in sexual selection.
Pomiankowski A
J Theor Biol; 1987 Sep; 128(2):195-218. PubMed ID: 3431135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mate sampling influences the intensity of sexual selection and the evolution of costly sexual ornaments.
Muniz DG; Machado G
J Theor Biol; 2018 Jun; 447():74-83. PubMed ID: 29567325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evolution of frequency-dependent mate choice: keeping up with fashion trends.
Kokko H; Jennions MD; Houde A
Proc Biol Sci; 2007 May; 274(1615):1317-24. PubMed ID: 17360285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. THE EVOLUTION OF MATE PREFERENCES FOR MULTIPLE SEXUAL ORNAMENTS.
Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A
Evolution; 1994 Jun; 48(3):853-867. PubMed ID: 28568273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation.
McPeek MA; Gavrilets S
Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):1967-80. PubMed ID: 17133854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Coevolution of costly mate choice and condition-dependent display of good genes.
Houle D; Kondrashov AS
Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Jan; 269(1486):97-104. PubMed ID: 11788042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Female mating preferences and offspring survival: testing hypotheses on the genetic basis of mate choice in a wild lekking bird.
Sardell RJ; Kempenaers B; Duval EH
Mol Ecol; 2014 Feb; 23(4):933-46. PubMed ID: 24383885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The dilemma of Fisherian sexual selection: mate choice for indirect benefits despite rarity and overall weakness of trait-preference genetic correlation.
Greenfield MD; Alem S; Limousin D; Bailey NW
Evolution; 2014 Dec; 68(12):3524-36. PubMed ID: 25308282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The evolution of experience-mediated plasticity in mate preferences.
Fowler-Finn KD; RodrÃguez RL
J Evol Biol; 2012 Sep; 25(9):1855-63. PubMed ID: 22817109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Testing the correlated response hypothesis for the evolution and maintenance of male mating preferences in Drosophila serrata.
Gosden TP; Rundle HD; Chenoweth SF
J Evol Biol; 2014 Oct; 27(10):2106-12. PubMed ID: 25078542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is biased mutation sufficient to save runaway sexual selection?
Dashtbali M; Henshaw JM
Evolution; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38747625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evolution of mate choice for genome-wide heterozygosity.
Fromhage L; Kokko H; Reid JM
Evolution; 2009 Mar; 63(3):684-94. PubMed ID: 19220455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The causes of variation in the presence of genetic covariance between sexual traits and preferences.
Fowler-Finn KD; RodrÃguez RL
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2016 May; 91(2):498-510. PubMed ID: 25808899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can non-directional male mating preferences facilitate honest female ornamentation?
Chenoweth SF; Doughty P; Kokko H
Ecol Lett; 2006 Feb; 9(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 16958883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adaptive plasticity in female mate choice dampens sexual selection on male ornaments in the lark bunting.
Chaine AS; Lyon BE
Science; 2008 Jan; 319(5862):459-62. PubMed ID: 18218896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
