These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25399634)

  • 41. Sexual selection on Drosophila serrata male pheromones does not vary with female age or mating status.
    Gershman S; Delcourt M; Rundle HD
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Jun; 27(6):1279-86. PubMed ID: 24828752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The evolution of costly mate choice against segregation distorters.
    Manser A; Lindholm AK; Weissing FJ
    Evolution; 2017 Dec; 71(12):2817-2828. PubMed ID: 29071709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Population genetic models of male and mutual mate choice.
    Servedio MR; Lande R
    Evolution; 2006 Apr; 60(4):674-85. PubMed ID: 16739450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Condition-dependent mutation rates and sexual selection.
    Cotton S
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Apr; 22(4):899-906. PubMed ID: 19210586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The evolution of sex roles in mate searching.
    Fromhage L; Jennions M; Kokko H
    Evolution; 2016 Mar; 70(3):617-24. PubMed ID: 26842774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Female mate-choice drives the evolution of male-biased dispersal in a social mammal.
    Höner OP; Wachter B; East ML; Streich WJ; Wilhelm K; Burke T; Hofer H
    Nature; 2007 Aug; 448(7155):798-801. PubMed ID: 17700698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Female resistance to sexual coercion can evolve to preserve the indirect benefits of mate choice.
    Snow SS; Alonzo SH; Servedio MR; Prum RO
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Jun; 32(6):545-558. PubMed ID: 30817033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Sexy sons from re-mating do not recoup the direct costs of harmful male interactions in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system.
    Orteiza N; Linder JE; Rice WR
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Sep; 18(5):1315-23. PubMed ID: 16135126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Paternal genetic effects on offspring fitness are context dependent within the extrapair mating system of a socially monogamous passerine.
    Schmoll T; Dietrich V; Winkel W; Epplen JT; Schurr F; Lubjuhn T
    Evolution; 2005 Mar; 59(3):645-57. PubMed ID: 15856706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Mate preference for a phenotypically plastic trait is learned, and may facilitate preference-phenotype matching.
    Westerman EL; Chirathivat N; Schyling E; Monteiro A
    Evolution; 2014 Jun; 68(6):1661-70. PubMed ID: 24528407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Gentlemen prefer blondes: the evolution of mate preference among strategically allocated males.
    Rowell JT; Servedio MR
    Am Nat; 2009 Jan; 173(1):12-25. PubMed ID: 19063659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Describing mate preference functions and other function-valued traits.
    Kilmer JT; Fowler-Finn KD; Gray DA; Höbel G; Rebar D; Reichert MS; Rodríguez RL
    J Evol Biol; 2017 Sep; 30(9):1658-1673. PubMed ID: 28556474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A potential resolution to the lek paradox through indirect genetic effects.
    Miller CW; Moore AJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 May; 274(1615):1279-86. PubMed ID: 17341455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Signaling efficacy drives the evolution of larger sexual ornaments by sexual selection.
    Tazzyman SJ; Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A
    Evolution; 2014 Jan; 68(1):216-29. PubMed ID: 24099137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Experience-mediated plasticity in mate preferences: mating assurance in a variable environment.
    Fowler-Finn KD; Rodríguez RL
    Evolution; 2012 Feb; 66(2):459-68. PubMed ID: 22276541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Male mating constraints affect mutual mate choice: prudent male courting and sperm-limited females.
    Härdling R; Gosden T; Aguilée R
    Am Nat; 2008 Aug; 172(2):259-71. PubMed ID: 18588428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Larger females are choosier in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor).
    Kuczynski MC; Getty T; Gering E
    Behav Processes; 2017 Feb; 135():29-35. PubMed ID: 27913165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
    Fedina TY; Lewis SM
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Temperature coupling of mate attraction signals and female mate preferences in four populations of Enchenopa treehopper (Hemiptera: Membracidae).
    Jocson DMI; Smeester ME; Leith NT; Macchiano A; Fowler-Finn KD
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Oct; 32(10):1046-1056. PubMed ID: 31278803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Condition-dependence, pleiotropy and the handicap principle of sexual selection in melanin-based colouration.
    Roulin A
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2016 May; 91(2):328-48. PubMed ID: 25631160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.