154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25399749)
1. Measurements of the ripple effect and geometric distribution of switched gradient fields inside a magnetic resonance scanner.
Sundström H; Mild KH; Wilén J
Bioelectromagnetics; 2015 Feb; 36(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 25399749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Occupational exposure measurements of static and pulsed gradient magnetic fields in the vicinity of MRI scanners.
Kännälä S; Toivo T; Alanko T; Jokela K
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 54(7):2243-57. PubMed ID: 19293469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exposure to static and time-varying magnetic fields from working in the static magnetic stray fields of MRI scanners: a comprehensive survey in the Netherlands.
Schaap K; Christopher-De Vries Y; Crozier S; De Vocht F; Kromhout H
Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 Nov; 58(9):1094-110. PubMed ID: 25139484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurement of electric fields induced in a human subject due to natural movements in static magnetic fields or exposure to alternating magnetic field gradients.
Glover PM; Bowtell R
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(2):361-73. PubMed ID: 18184992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computational dosimetry of induced electric fields during realistic movements in the vicinity of a 3 T MRI scanner.
Laakso I; Kännälä S; Jokela K
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 58(8):2625-40. PubMed ID: 23552657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Weighted-peak assessment of occupational exposure due to MRI gradient fields and movements in a nonhomogeneous static magnetic field.
Andreuccetti D; Contessa GM; Falsaperla R; Lodato R; Pinto R; Zoppetti N; Rossi P
Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011910. PubMed ID: 23298101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis and measurements of magnetic field exposures for healthcare workers in selected MR environments.
Fuentes MA; Trakic A; Wilson SJ; Crozier S
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Apr; 55(4):1355-64. PubMed ID: 18390326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Study of occupational exposure to magnetic fields among operators of magnetic resonance scanning at the Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital (Bergamo)].
Cretti FR; Gambirasio A
Med Lav; 2015 Jan; 106(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 25607283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Experimental evaluation of the occupational exposure to static magnetic fields on a 3 T magnetic resonance scanner].
Moro L; Alabiso F; Parisoli F; Frigerio F
G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2013; 35(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 23798231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of exposure to (ultra) high static magnetic fields during activities around human MRI scanners.
Fatahi M; Karpowicz J; Gryz K; Fattahi A; Rose G; Speck O
MAGMA; 2017 Jun; 30(3):255-264. PubMed ID: 27981395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. EU Directive 2004/40: field measurements of a 1.5 T clinical MR scanner.
Riches SF; Collins DJ; Scuffham JW; Leach MO
Br J Radiol; 2007 Jun; 80(954):483-7. PubMed ID: 17684078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. More Space, Less Noise-New-generation Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging Systems Can Improve Patient Comfort: A Prospective 0.55T-1.5T-Scanner Comparison.
Rusche T; Vosshenrich J; Winkel DJ; Donners R; Segeroth M; Bach M; Merkle EM; Breit HC
J Clin Med; 2022 Nov; 11(22):. PubMed ID: 36431182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Occupational exposure levels of static magnetic field during routine MRI examination in 3T MR system.
Yamaguchi-Sekino S; Nakai T; Imai S; Izawa S; Okuno T
Bioelectromagnetics; 2014 Jan; 35(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 24115150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Physiologic effects of intense MR imaging gradient fields.
Bourland JD; Nyenhuis JA; Schaefer DJ
Neuroimaging Clin N Am; 1999 May; 9(2):363-77. PubMed ID: 10318720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Possible mutagenic effects of magnetic fields].
Teichmann EM; Hengstler JG; Schreiber WG; Akbari W; Georgi H; Hehn M; Schiffer I; Oesch F; Spiess HW; Thelen M
Rofo; 2000 Nov; 172(11):934-9. PubMed ID: 11142128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exposure classification of MRI workers in epidemiological studies.
Hansson Mild K; Hand J; Hietanen M; Gowland P; Karpowicz J; Keevil S; Lagroye I; van Rongen E; Scarfi MR; Wilén J
Bioelectromagnetics; 2013 Jan; 34(1):81-4. PubMed ID: 22532229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. dB/dt Evaluation in MRI Sites: Is ICNIRP Threshold Limit (for Workers) Exceeded?
Acri G; Inferrera P; Denaro L; Sansotta C; Ruello E; Anfuso C; Salmeri FM; Garreffa G; Vermiglio G; Testagrossa B
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Jun; 15(7):. PubMed ID: 29933587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of electromagnetic field exposure limits in Europe: is the future of interventional MRI safe?
Hill DL; McLeish K; Keevil SF
Acad Radiol; 2005 Sep; 12(9):1135-42. PubMed ID: 16099687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MR safety: simultaneous B0, dΦ/dt, and dB/dt measurements on MR-workers up to 7 T.
Groebner J; Umathum R; Bock M; Krafft AJ; Semmler W; Rauschenberg J
MAGMA; 2011 Dec; 24(6):315-22. PubMed ID: 21755466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Exposure of Infants to Gradient Fields in a Baby MRI Scanner.
Tang F; Giaccone L; Hao J; Freschi F; Wu T; Crozier S; Liu F
Bioelectromagnetics; 2022 Feb; 43(2):69-80. PubMed ID: 35005795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
