154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25399749)
21. Genotoxic effects of 3 T magnetic resonance imaging in cultured human lymphocytes.
Lee JW; Kim MS; Kim YJ; Choi YJ; Lee Y; Chung HW
Bioelectromagnetics; 2011 Oct; 32(7):535-42. PubMed ID: 21412810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Acoustic analysis of gradient-coil noise in MR imaging.
Hurwitz R; Lane SR; Bell RA; Brant-Zawadzki MN
Radiology; 1989 Nov; 173(2):545-8. PubMed ID: 2798888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The pattern of exposure to static magnetic field of nurses involved in activities related to contrast administration into patients diagnosed in 1.5 T MRI scanners.
Karpowicz J; Gryz K
Electromagn Biol Med; 2013 Jun; 32(2):182-91. PubMed ID: 23675621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A cradle-shaped gradient coil to expand the clear-bore width of an animal MRI scanner.
Gilbert KM; Gati JS; Klassen LM; Menon RS
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jan; 55(2):497-514. PubMed ID: 20023323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Modification of pulse sequences reduces occupational exposure from MRI switched gradient fields: Preliminary results.
Wilén J; Hauksson J; Mild KH
Bioelectromagnetics; 2010 Jan; 31(1):85-7. PubMed ID: 19753611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. ASSESSMENT OF MOVEMENT-INDUCED TIME-VARYING MAGNETIC FIELDS EXPOSURE IN MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING BY A COMMERCIAL PORTABLE MAGNETOMETER.
Filice S; Rossi R; Crisi G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 185(3):326-330. PubMed ID: 30806458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Numerically simulated exposure of children and adults to pulsed gradient fields in MRI.
Samoudi AM; Vermeeren G; Tanghe E; Van Holen R; Martens L; Josephs W
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Nov; 44(5):1360-1367. PubMed ID: 27043243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Spatial analysis of acoustic noise transfer function with a human-body phantom in a clinical MRI scanner.
Hamaguchi T; Miyati T; Ohno N; Matsushita T; Takata T; Matsuura Y; Kobayashi S; Gabata T
Acta Radiol; 2023 Mar; 64(3):1212-1221. PubMed ID: 35538857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Personal exposure to static and time-varying magnetic fields during MRI system test procedures.
de Vocht F; Muller F; Engels H; Kromhout H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Nov; 30(5):1223-8. PubMed ID: 19856458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Acoustic noise generated by TMS in typical environment and inside an MRI scanner.
Nyrhinen MJ; Souza VH; Ilmoniemi RJ; Lin FH
Brain Stimul; 2024; 17(2):184-193. PubMed ID: 38342363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Analysis and correction of count rate reduction during simultaneous MR-PET measurements with the BrainPET scanner.
Weirich C; Brenner D; Scheins J; Besancon E; Tellmann L; Herzog H; Shah NJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Jul; 31(7):1372-80. PubMed ID: 22374353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Physiologic and dosimetric considerations for limiting electric fields induced in the body by movement in a static magnetic field.
Jokela K; Saunders RD
Health Phys; 2011 Jun; 100(6):641-53. PubMed ID: 22004933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Retrospective assessment of exposure to static magnetic fields during production and development of magnetic resonance imaging systems.
Bongers S; Christopher Y; Engels H; Slottje P; Kromhout H
Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 Jan; 58(1):85-102. PubMed ID: 24081380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. MRI gradient coil cylinder sound field simulation and measurement.
Mechefske CK; Wu Y; Rutt BK
J Biomech Eng; 2002 Aug; 124(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 12188211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Assessment of complex EMF exposure situations including inhomogeneous field distribution.
Jokela K
Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):531-40. PubMed ID: 17495653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Pacing in high field cardiac magnetic resonance imaging:
Nahrendorf M; Hiller KH; Hu K; Zeijlemaker V; Griswold M; Bauer WR
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 May; 27(5):671-4. PubMed ID: 15125728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Analysis, comparison and representation of occupational exposure to a static magnetic field in a 3-T MRI site.
Hartwig V; Biagini C; De Marchi D; Flori A; Gabellieri C; Virgili G; Ferrante Vero LF; Landini L; Vanello N; Giovannetti G
Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2022 Mar; 28(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 32276568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Parameters Affecting Worst-Case Gradient-Field Heating of Passive Conductive Implants.
Bassen H; Zaidi T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Oct; 56(4):1197-1204. PubMed ID: 35778374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Simultaneous exposure to MRI-related static and low-frequency movement-induced time-varying magnetic fields affects neurocognitive performance: A double-blind randomized crossover study.
van Nierop LE; Slottje P; van Zandvoort M; Kromhout H
Magn Reson Med; 2015 Sep; 74(3):840-9. PubMed ID: 25224577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. From static to dynamic 1.5T MRI-linac prototype: impact of gantry position related magnetic field variation on image fidelity.
Crijns S; Raaymakers B
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 59(13):3241-7. PubMed ID: 24874027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
