106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25400856)
1. Mammography: a review of records in the Department of Radiology at a National Referral Hospital in Uganda.
Kiguli-Malwadde E; Mubuuke RG; Bugeza S; Mutungi B
Pan Afr Med J; 2014; 18():89. PubMed ID: 25400856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammographic referral patterns for two breast imaging units in Jamaica.
Soares D; Kirlew K; Johnson P; Reid M
West Indian Med J; 2007 Mar; 56(2):159-62. PubMed ID: 17910147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Opportunistic mammography screening provides effective detection rates in a limited resource healthcare system.
Teh YC; Tan GH; Taib NA; Rahmat K; Westerhout CJ; Fadzli F; See MH; Jamaris S; Yip CH
BMC Cancer; 2015 May; 15():405. PubMed ID: 25972043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Opportunistic breast cancer screening in Hong Kong; a revisit of the Kwong Wah Hospital experience.
Lui CY; Lam HS; Chan LK; Tam KF; Chan CM; Leung TY; Mak KL
Hong Kong Med J; 2007 Apr; 13(2):106-13. PubMed ID: 17406037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mammographic screening: patterns of use and estimated impact on breast carcinoma survival.
Blanchard K; Colbert JA; Puri D; Weissman J; Moy B; Kopans DB; Kaine EM; Moore RH; Halpern EF; Hughes KS; Tanabe KK; Smith BL; Michaelson JS
Cancer; 2004 Aug; 101(3):495-507. PubMed ID: 15274062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The current state of the diagnostics of breast diseases in Lombardy].
Vergnaghi D; Panizza P; Gozzi G
Radiol Med; 2000 Nov; 100(5):314-20. PubMed ID: 11213407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom.
Smith-Bindman R; Chu PW; Miglioretti DL; Sickles EA; Blanks R; Ballard-Barbash R; Bobo JK; Lee NC; Wallis MG; Patnick J; Kerlikowske K
JAMA; 2003 Oct; 290(16):2129-37. PubMed ID: 14570948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening mammography: value in women 35-39 years old.
Liberman L; Dershaw DD; Deutch BM; Thaler HT; Lippin BS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jul; 161(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8517320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors associated with imaging and procedural events used to detect breast cancer after screening mammography.
Carney PA; Abraham LA; Miglioretti DL; Yabroff KR; Sickles EA; Buist DS; Kasales CJ; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Dignan MB; Weaver DL; Kerlikowske K;
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):385-92. PubMed ID: 17242246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Difficulties in implementing an organized screening program for breast cancer in Brazil with emphasis on diagnostic methods.
Silva TB; Mauad EC; Carvalho AL; Jacobs LA; Shulman LN
Rural Remote Health; 2013; 13(2):2321. PubMed ID: 23597169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Current knowledge, attitudes and practices of women on breast cancer and mammography at Mulago Hospital.
Elsie KM; Gonzaga MA; Francis B; Michael KG; Rebecca N; Rosemary BK; Zeridah M
Pan Afr Med J; 2010 May; 5():9. PubMed ID: 21120008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dutch digital breast cancer screening: implications for breast cancer care.
Timmers JM; den Heeten GJ; Adang EM; Otten JD; Verbeek AL; Broeders MJ
Eur J Public Health; 2012 Dec; 22(6):925-9. PubMed ID: 22158996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing the performance of mammography screening in the USA and the UK.
Smith-Bindman R; Ballard-Barbash R; Miglioretti DL; Patnick J; Kerlikowske K
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 15814020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mobile mammography screening: the James Graham Brown Cancer Center three year experience. Implications for public and professional education.
Flynn MB; Amin EA; Martin RC
J Ky Med Assoc; 1998 Jan; 96(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 9470312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiotherapy in cancer management at Mulago Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
Kigula-Mugambe JB; Durosinmi-Etti FA
East Afr Med J; 1996 Sep; 73(9):611-3. PubMed ID: 8991245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
