These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25401067)

  • 1. Co-production of bioethanol and probiotic yeast biomass from agricultural feedstock: application of the rural biorefinery concept.
    Hull CM; Loveridge EJ; Donnison IS; Kelly DE; Kelly SL
    AMB Express; 2014; 4():64. PubMed ID: 25401067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Co-production of ethanol and squalene using a Saccharomyces cerevisiae ERG1 (squalene epoxidase) mutant and agro-industrial feedstock.
    Hull CM; Loveridge EJ; Rolley NJ; Donnison IS; Kelly SL; Kelly DE
    Biotechnol Biofuels; 2014; 7(1):133. PubMed ID: 25298782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring industrial and natural
    Favaro L; Jansen T; van Zyl WH
    Crit Rev Biotechnol; 2019 Sep; 39(6):800-816. PubMed ID: 31230476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Co-production of 11α-hydroxyprogesterone and ethanol using recombinant yeast expressing fungal steroid hydroxylases.
    Hull CM; Warrilow AGS; Rolley NJ; Price CL; Donnison IS; Kelly DE; Kelly SL
    Biotechnol Biofuels; 2017; 10():226. PubMed ID: 29021826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Applications of de-oiled microalgal biomass towards development of sustainable biorefinery.
    Maurya R; Paliwal C; Ghosh T; Pancha I; Chokshi K; Mitra M; Ghosh A; Mishra S
    Bioresour Technol; 2016 Aug; 214():787-796. PubMed ID: 27161655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Unique genetic basis of the distinct antibiotic potency of high acetic acid production in the probiotic yeast
    Offei B; Vandecruys P; De Graeve S; Foulquié-Moreno MR; Thevelein JM
    Genome Res; 2019 Sep; 29(9):1478-1494. PubMed ID: 31467028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Engineering Saccharomyces cerevisiae for application in integrated bioprocessing biorefineries.
    Minnaar LS; Kruger F; Fortuin J; Hoffmeester LJ; den Haan R
    Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2024 Feb; 85():103030. PubMed ID: 38091873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biological potential of microalgae in China for biorefinery-based production of biofuels and high value compounds.
    Li J; Liu Y; Cheng JJ; Mos M; Daroch M
    N Biotechnol; 2015 Dec; 32(6):588-96. PubMed ID: 25686716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Safflower-based biorefinery producing a broad spectrum of biofuels and biochemicals: A life cycle assessment perspective.
    Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha H; Nazemi F; Khounani Z; Ghanavati H; Shafiei M; Karimi K; Lam SS; Aghbashlo M; Tabatabaei M
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jan; 802():149842. PubMed ID: 34455274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Study of biorefineries based on experimental data: production of bioethanol, biogas, syngas, and electricity using coffee-cut stems as raw material.
    Aristizábal-Marulanda V; Solarte-Toro JC; Cardona Alzate CA
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 May; 28(19):24590-24604. PubMed ID: 32594433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The flexible feedstock concept in Industrial Biotechnology: Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli, Corynebacterium glutamicum, Pseudomonas, Bacillus and yeast strains for access to alternative carbon sources.
    Wendisch VF; Brito LF; Gil Lopez M; Hennig G; Pfeifenschneider J; Sgobba E; Veldmann KH
    J Biotechnol; 2016 Sep; 234():139-157. PubMed ID: 27491712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to high pressure (15, 25 and 35 MPa) to enhance the production of bioethanol.
    Ferreira RM; Mota MJ; Lopes RP; Sousa S; Gomes AM; Delgadillo I; Saraiva JA
    Food Res Int; 2019 Jan; 115():352-359. PubMed ID: 30599952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. boulardii in co-fermentations with S. cerevisiae for the production of craft beers with potential healthy value-added.
    Capece A; Romaniello R; Pietrafesa A; Siesto G; Pietrafesa R; Zambuto M; Romano P
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2018 Nov; 284():22-30. PubMed ID: 29990636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Study on the Sequential Combination of Bioethanol and Biogas Production from Corn Straw.
    Kotarska K; Dziemianowicz W; Świerczyńska A
    Molecules; 2019 Dec; 24(24):. PubMed ID: 31842493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A holistic zero waste biorefinery approach for macroalgal biomass utilization: A review.
    Rajak RC; Jacob S; Kim BS
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 May; 716():137067. PubMed ID: 32059301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A New Approach for the Production of Selenium-Enriched and Probiotic Yeast Biomass from Agro-Industrial by-Products in a Stirred-Tank Bioreactor.
    Martiniano SE; Fernandes LA; Alba EM; Philippini RR; Tabuchi SCT; Kieliszek M; Santos JCD; da Silva SS
    Metabolites; 2020 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 33322101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Coproduction of bioethanol with other biofuels.
    Ahring BK; Westermann P
    Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 108():289-302. PubMed ID: 17676282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cyanobacterial biorefinery: Towards economic feasibility through the maximum valorization of biomass.
    Prabha S; Vijay AK; Paul RR; George B
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Mar; 814():152795. PubMed ID: 34979226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A review of biological delignification and detoxification methods for lignocellulosic bioethanol production.
    Moreno AD; Ibarra D; Alvira P; Tomás-Pejó E; Ballesteros M
    Crit Rev Biotechnol; 2015; 35(3):342-54. PubMed ID: 24506661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Generating a geospatial database of U.S. regional feedstock production for use in evaluating the environmental footprint of biofuels.
    Holder CT; Cleland JC; LeDuc SD; Andereck Z; Hogan C; Martin KM
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Apr; 66(4):356-65. PubMed ID: 26727486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.