These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25401127)
1. Analysis of factors influencing telephone call response rate in an epidemiological study. Matías-Guiu J; Serrano-Castro PJ; Mauri-Llerda JÁ; Hernández-Ramos FJ; Sánchez-Alvarez JC; Sanz M ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():179375. PubMed ID: 25401127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Methodology of a study on insomnia in the general population]. Ohayon MM Encephale; 2002; 28(3 Pt 1):217-26. PubMed ID: 12091782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [A comparison of 2 survey methods: the telephone versus the mails in the diabetic population of a health center]. Martínez Ibáñez MT; Hernández González E; Méndez García CD; Gómez Juárez JL; Salas Hospital JC; Vázquez Veloso C; Solsona Gimeno R Aten Primaria; 1999 Mar; 23(4):198-203. PubMed ID: 10333603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimizing telephone-based population sampling--a reply. Smith AM; de Visser RO; Rissel CE Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Sep; 16(9):734-5. PubMed ID: 16911904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Chapter II. Differences between the telephone and personal interview data. Groves RM; Miller PV; Cannell CF Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):11-9. PubMed ID: 15791751 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Chapter IV. The effects of respondent rules on health survey reports. Mathiowetz NA; Groves RM Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):26-32. PubMed ID: 15791753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Knowledge of stroke warning symptoms and intended action in response to stroke in Spain: a nationwide population-based study. Lundelin K; Graciani A; García-Puig J; Guallar-Castillón P; Taboada JM; Rodríguez-Artalejo F; Banegas JR Cerebrovasc Dis; 2012; 34(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 22907330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Telephone versus face to face interviewing as a means of collecting data relevant to the management of diabetes among general practitioners in France: a randomized design. Chwalow AJ; Costagliola D; Stern J; Mesbah M; Eschwege E Diabete Metab; 1989; 15(4):157-60. PubMed ID: 2806701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Large population survey: strengths and limits. Methodology of the EDIFICE survey. Roussel C; Touboul C Eur J Cancer Prev; 2011 Jan; 20 Suppl 1():S5-7. PubMed ID: 21245682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The telephone interview: the methodological strategy for collecting population data]. Cassiani SH; Zanetti ML; Pelá NT Rev Paul Enferm; 1992; 11(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 1306290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characteristics of telephone survey respondents according to willingness to participate. Voigt LF; Koepsell TD; Daling JR Am J Epidemiol; 2003 Jan; 157(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 12505892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Participation rates in the selection of population controls in a case-control study of colorectal cancer using two recruitment methods. Castaño-Vinyals G; Nieuwenhuijsen MJ; Moreno V; Carrasco E; Guinó E; Kogevinas M; Villanueva CM Gac Sanit; 2011; 25(5):353-6. PubMed ID: 21703726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An introductory letter in advance of a telephone survey may increase response rate. Majowicz SE; Edge VL; Flint J; Sockett P; Doré K; McDougall L; Remple V; Fyfe M; Henson S; Gaebel K Can Commun Dis Rep; 2004 Jul; 30(13):121-3. PubMed ID: 15248524 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Strategies for achieving a high response rate in a home interview survey. Kiezebrink K; Crombie IK; Irvine L; Swanson V; Power K; Wrieden WL; Slane PW BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Jun; 9():46. PubMed ID: 19566931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Telephone answering machines: the influence of leaving messages on telephone interviewing response rates. Harlow BL; Crea EC; East MA; Oleson B; Fraer CJ; Cramer DW Epidemiology; 1993 Jul; 4(4):380-3. PubMed ID: 8347750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recruitment methods and differences in early, late and non-respondents in the first MONICA-Catalonia population survey. Rodes A; Sans S; Balaña LL; Paluzie G; Aguilera R; Balaguer-Vintro I Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1990; 38(5-6):447-53. PubMed ID: 2082450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of the Waksberg telephone sampling method for the selection of population controls. Perneger TV; Myers TL; Klag MJ; Whelton PK Am J Epidemiol; 1993 Oct; 138(8):574-84. PubMed ID: 8237981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The experience of using random digit dialling methods in a population-based chronic pain study. Blyth FM; March LM; Shellard D; Cousins MJ Aust N Z J Public Health; 2002 Dec; 26(6):511-4. PubMed ID: 12530793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Feasibility of using web surveys to collect time-activity data. Wu XM; Bennett DH; Lee K; Cassady DL; Ritz B; Hertz-Picciotto I J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2012; 22(2):116-25. PubMed ID: 21792233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]