These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25401381)

  • 1. Algorithm aversion: people erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err.
    Dietvorst BJ; Simmons JP; Massey C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Feb; 144(1):114-26. PubMed ID: 25401381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using meta-predictions to identify experts in the crowd when past performance is unknown.
    Martinie M; Wilkening T; Howe PDL
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0232058. PubMed ID: 32330175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. People Reject Algorithms in Uncertain Decision Domains Because They Have Diminishing Sensitivity to Forecasting Error.
    Dietvorst BJ; Bharti S
    Psychol Sci; 2020 Oct; 31(10):1302-1314. PubMed ID: 32916083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of Choice Restriction on Accuracy and User Experience in an Internet-Based Geopolitical Forecasting Task.
    Widmer CL; Summerville A; Juvina I; Minnery BS
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():662279. PubMed ID: 34335374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Premature predictions: Accurate forecasters are not viewed as more competent for earlier predictions.
    Mislavsky R; Gaertig C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Jan; 153(1):159-170. PubMed ID: 37870813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Motivated underpinnings of the impact bias in affective forecasts.
    Morewedge CK; Buechel EC
    Emotion; 2013 Dec; 13(6):1023-9. PubMed ID: 23914762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An Approach to Improve the Performance of PM Forecasters.
    de Mattos Neto PS; Cavalcanti GD; Madeiro F; Ferreira TA
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138507. PubMed ID: 26414182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The wisdom of many in few: Finding individuals who are as wise as the crowd.
    Himmelstein M; Budescu DV; Ho EH
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 May; 152(5):1223-1244. PubMed ID: 36862490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantifying machine influence over human forecasters.
    Abeliuk A; Benjamin DM; Morstatter F; Galstyan A
    Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):15940. PubMed ID: 32994447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Psychological strategies for winning a geopolitical forecasting tournament.
    Mellers B; Ungar L; Baron J; Ramos J; Gurcay B; Fincher K; Scott SE; Moore D; Atanasov P; Swift SA; Murray T; Stone E; Tetlock PE
    Psychol Sci; 2014 May; 25(5):1106-15. PubMed ID: 24659192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Daily Affective and Behavioral Forecasts in Romantic Relationships: Seeing Tomorrow Through the Lens of Today.
    Lemay EP; Lin JL; Muir HJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Jul; 41(7):1005-19. PubMed ID: 26023077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Errors in Moral Forecasting: Perceptions of Affect Shape the Gap Between Moral Behaviors and Moral Forecasts.
    Teper R; Tullett AM; Page-Gould E; Inzlicht M
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Jul; 41(7):887-900. PubMed ID: 25900823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. People see more of their biases in algorithms.
    Celiktutan B; Cadario R; Morewedge CK
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 Apr; 121(16):e2317602121. PubMed ID: 38598346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recalibrating probabilistic forecasts of epidemics.
    Rumack A; Tibshirani RJ; Rosenfeld R
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Dec; 18(12):e1010771. PubMed ID: 36520949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Uncertain About Uncertainty: How Qualitative Expressions of Forecaster Confidence Impact Decision-Making With Uncertainty Visualizations.
    Padilla LMK; Powell M; Kay M; Hullman J
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():579267. PubMed ID: 33564298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combination of artificial neural-network forecasters for prediction of natural gas consumption.
    Khotanzad A; Elragal H; Lu TL
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw; 2000; 11(2):464-73. PubMed ID: 18249775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Win-Stay, Lose-Sample: a simple sequential algorithm for approximating Bayesian inference.
    Bonawitz E; Denison S; Gopnik A; Griffiths TL
    Cogn Psychol; 2014 Nov; 74():35-65. PubMed ID: 25086501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How to make loss aversion disappear and reverse: tests of the decision by sampling origin of loss aversion.
    Walasek L; Stewart N
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Feb; 144(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 25485606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Human and Algorithmic Predictions in Geopolitical Forecasting: Quantifying Uncertainty in Hard-to-Quantify Domains.
    Mellers BA; McCoy JP; Lu L; Tetlock PE
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2023 Aug; ():17456916231185339. PubMed ID: 37642169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preference for human, not algorithm aversion.
    Morewedge CK
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2022 Oct; 26(10):824-826. PubMed ID: 35941064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.