These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25402262)
1. Variation in prices for common medical tests and procedures. Aliferis L JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Jan; 175(1):11-2. PubMed ID: 25402262 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A new program for sharing medical cost information. Redberg RF JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Jan; 175(1):13. PubMed ID: 25402948 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Physicians' awareness of mammography charges. Saunders AF; Divine GW; Weinberger M Am J Prev Med; 1994; 10(6):357-60. PubMed ID: 7880556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer screening. Lee CH; Weinreb JC J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Mar; 1(3):176-82. PubMed ID: 17411555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variability in billing practices for whole-body magnetic resonance imaging: reply to Degnan et al. Schooler GR; Davis JT; Daldrup-Link H; Frush DP Pediatr Radiol; 2019 Jan; 49(1):154. PubMed ID: 30191257 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of costs and benefits of breast cancer screening with mammography, ultrasonography, and MRI. Feig S Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2011 Mar; 38(1):179-96, ix. PubMed ID: 21419333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mammography and monkey bars. Kaye AD J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Jun; 1(6):379-80. PubMed ID: 17411610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Fee structure as a determinant of patient's choice to undergo mammography. Tippy P; Falvo DR; Woehlke P Fam Pract Res J; 1989; 9(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 2610010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anxiety and specific distress in women at intermediate and high risk of breast cancer before and after surveillance by magnetic resonance imaging and mammography versus standard mammography. Brédart A; Kop JL; Fall M; Pelissier S; Simondi C; Dolbeault S; Livartowski A; Tardivon A; Psychooncology; 2012 Nov; 21(11):1185-94. PubMed ID: 21812069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Optimal use of MRI mammography from the economic viewpoint]. Oellinger H; Blohmer JU; Siewert C; Hadijuana J; Gutberlet M; Ehrenstein T; Lichtenegger W; Felix R Zentralbl Chir; 1998; 123 Suppl 5():42-6. PubMed ID: 10063571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perspective: limited MR scans: a concept whose time has come. Solomon MA J Magn Reson Imaging; 1996; 6(1):74. PubMed ID: 8851408 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Cost-effectiveness of MR-imaging in the preoperative work-up of suspicious breast lesions]. Schmitt KP; Boehm T; Fleck M; Kaiser WA Rofo; 2001 Oct; 173(10):898-901. PubMed ID: 11588676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The price of mammography in the United States: data from the National Survey of Mammography Facilities. Breen N; Brown ML Milbank Q; 1994; 72(3):431-50. PubMed ID: 7935241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]