These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25402464)

  • 1. Development of an ELISA for evaluation of swab recovery efficiencies of bovine serum albumin.
    Sparding N; Slotved HC; Nicolaisen GM; Giese SB; Elmlund J; Steenhard NR
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112876. PubMed ID: 25402464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enhanced forensic DNA recovery with appropriate swabs and optimized swabbing technique.
    Hedman J; Akel Y; Jansson L; Hedell R; Wallmark N; Forsberg C; Ansell R
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jul; 53():102491. PubMed ID: 33774569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy of a Sonicating Swab for Removal and Capture of Microorganisms from Experimental and Natural Contaminated Surfaces.
    Ahnrud GP; Mendoza AJ; Hurley MJ; Marek PJ
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 May; 84(9):. PubMed ID: 29500264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Collaborative swab performance comparison and the impact of sampling solution volumes on DNA recovery.
    Seiberle I; Währer J; Kron S; Flury K; Girardin M; Schocker A; Schulz I
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102716. PubMed ID: 35512614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New technique to take samples from environmental surfaces using flocked nylon swabs.
    Hedin G; Rynbäck J; Loré B
    J Hosp Infect; 2010 Aug; 75(4):314-7. PubMed ID: 20451296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of two non-invasive methods of microbial analysis in surgery practice: incision swabbing and the indirect imprint technique.
    Chovanec Z; Veverkova L; Votava M; Svoboda J; Jedlicka V; Capov I
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2014 Dec; 15(6):786-93. PubMed ID: 25478933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Swab sample transfer for point-of-care diagnostics: characterization of swab types and manual agitation methods.
    Panpradist N; Toley BJ; Zhang X; Byrnes S; Buser JR; Englund JA; Lutz BR
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e105786. PubMed ID: 25181250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the specificity of a commercial ELISA for detection of antibodies against porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus in individual oral fluid of pigs collected in two different ways.
    Sattler T; Wodak E; Schmoll F
    BMC Vet Res; 2015 Mar; 11():70. PubMed ID: 25890153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Problems associated with traditional hygiene swabbing: the need for in-house standardization.
    Moore G; Griffith C
    J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Oct; 103(4):1090-103. PubMed ID: 17897214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of swabbing technique and duration on forensic DNA recovery.
    Abdullah A; Szkuta B; Meakin GE
    Sci Justice; 2023 May; 63(3):343-348. PubMed ID: 37169459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sampling technique is important for optimal isolation of pharyngeal gonorrhoea.
    Mitchell M; Rane V; Fairley CK; Whiley DM; Bradshaw CS; Bissessor M; Chen MY
    Sex Transm Infect; 2013 Nov; 89(7):557-60. PubMed ID: 23694937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Self-collected swabs of the urinary meatus diagnose more Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections than first catch urine from men.
    Chernesky MA; Jang D; Portillo E; Smieja M; Gilchrist J; Ewert R; Macritchie C
    Sex Transm Infect; 2013 Mar; 89(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 23024224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of DNA collection and retrieval from two swab types (cotton and nylon flocked swab) when processed using three QIAGEN extraction methods.
    Brownlow RJ; Dagnall KE; Ames CE
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 May; 57(3):713-7. PubMed ID: 22211626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the M-Vac
    McLamb JM; Adams LD; Kavlick MF
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Nov; 65(6):1828-1834. PubMed ID: 32687222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of swab material on microbial surface sampling.
    Jansson L; Akel Y; Eriksson R; Lavander M; Hedman J
    J Microbiol Methods; 2020 Sep; 176():106006. PubMed ID: 32721418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of rayon swab surface sample collection method for Bacillus spores from nonporous surfaces.
    Brown GS; Betty RG; Brockmann JE; Lucero DA; Souza CA; Walsh KS; Boucher RM; Tezak MS; Wilson MC; Rudolph T; Lindquist HD; Martinez KF
    J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Oct; 103(4):1074-80. PubMed ID: 17897212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The double-swab technique versus single swabs for human DNA recovery from various surfaces.
    Hedman J; Jansson L; Akel Y; Wallmark N; Gutierrez Liljestrand R; Forsberg C; Ansell R
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 May; 46():102253. PubMed ID: 32007674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of swabbing solution and swab type on DNA recovery from rigid environmental surfaces.
    You HS; Lee SH; Ok YJ; Kang HG; Sung HJ; Lee JY; Kang SS; Hyun SH
    J Microbiol Methods; 2019 Jun; 161():12-17. PubMed ID: 31004622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of heterologous enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for dehydroepiandrosterone in serum.
    Shrivastav TG; Chaube SK; Kariya KP; Bhanot S; Singh R; Kumar D
    J Immunoassay Immunochem; 2010; 31(4):266-78. PubMed ID: 21113840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nondestructive Biological Evidence Collection with Alternative Swabs and Adhesive Lifters.
    Plaza DT; Mealy JL; Lane JN; Parsons MN; Bathrick AS; Slack DP
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):485-488. PubMed ID: 27404622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.