302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25402548)
1. Quality measures and quality improvements in colonoscopy.
Ketwaroo GA; Sawhney MS
Curr Opin Gastroenterol; 2015 Jan; 31(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 25402548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Physician Non-adherence to Colonoscopy Interval Guidelines in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System.
Johnson MR; Grubber J; Grambow SC; Maciejewski ML; Dunn-Thomas T; Provenzale D; Fisher DA
Gastroenterology; 2015 Oct; 149(4):938-51. PubMed ID: 26122143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Increased adenoma detection rate with system-wide implementation of a split-dose preparation for colonoscopy.
Gurudu SR; Ramirez FC; Harrison ME; Leighton JA; Crowell MD
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Sep; 76(3):603-8.e1. PubMed ID: 22732876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Longer Withdrawal Time Is Associated With a Reduced Incidence of Interval Cancer After Screening Colonoscopy.
Shaukat A; Rector TS; Church TR; Lederle FA; Kim AS; Rank JM; Allen JI
Gastroenterology; 2015 Oct; 149(4):952-7. PubMed ID: 26164494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality in Colonoscopy.
Brunner KT; Calderwood AH
Curr Gastroenterol Rep; 2015 Oct; 17(10):461. PubMed ID: 26292664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Quality indicators for colonoscopy in the Peruvian Japanese Policlinic: linked factors].
Pérez VP; Yamamoto JW; Nago AN; Benavides MA; Ulloa CR; Alvarez GV; Calixto NN; Yoshidaira MY; Sánchez TG; Sánchez JP
Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam; 2011 Dec; 41(4):288-95. PubMed ID: 22292224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Colonoscopy quality assessment.
Fayad NF; Kahi CJ
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2015 Apr; 25(2):373-86. PubMed ID: 25839691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What Can We Do to Optimize Colonoscopy and How Effective Can We Be?
Hancock KS; Mascarenhas R; Lieberman D
Curr Gastroenterol Rep; 2016 Jun; 18(6):27. PubMed ID: 27098814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Colonoscopy reports and current state of performance measures.
Williams JE; Faigel DO
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2010 Oct; 20(4):685-97. PubMed ID: 20889072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Delivering colonoscopy screening for low-income populations in Suffolk County: strategies, outcomes, and benchmarks.
Lane DS; Messina CR; Cavanagh MF; Anderson JC
Cancer; 2013 Aug; 119 Suppl 15():2842-8. PubMed ID: 23868478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Advanced imaging in colonoscopy and its impact on quality.
Sharma P; Gupta N; Kuipers EJ; Repici A; Wallace M
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Jan; 79(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 24119713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adenoma detection with cap-assisted colonoscopy versus regular colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial.
de Wijkerslooth TR; Stoop EM; Bossuyt PM; Mathus-Vliegen EM; Dees J; Tytgat KM; van Leerdam ME; Fockens P; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E
Gut; 2012 Oct; 61(10):1426-34. PubMed ID: 22187070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A novel colonoscopy reporting system enabling quality assurance.
van Doorn SC; van Vliet J; Fockens P; Dekker E
Endoscopy; 2014 Mar; 46(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 24500977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Colonoscopy Quality Measures Across Various Practice Settings and the Impact of Performance Scorecards.
Inra JA; Nayor J; Rosenblatt M; Mutinga M; Reddy SI; Syngal S; Kastrinos F
Dig Dis Sci; 2017 Apr; 62(4):894-902. PubMed ID: 27995405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anatomic and advanced adenoma detection rates as quality metrics determined via natural language processing.
Gawron AJ; Thompson WK; Keswani RN; Rasmussen LV; Kho AN
Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 109(12):1844-9. PubMed ID: 24935271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of a Citywide Benchmarking Intervention on Colonoscopy Quality Performance.
Uche-Anya EN; Brown JJ; Asumeng C; Striplin J; Carlesimo M; Krauskopf M; Greenwald D; Bernstein B; Itzkowitz S; Schnoll-Sussman F; Lebwohl B
Dig Dis Sci; 2020 Sep; 65(9):2534-2541. PubMed ID: 32036513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sedation in screening colonoscopy: impact on quality indicators and complications.
Bannert C; Reinhart K; Dunkler D; Trauner M; Renner F; Knoflach P; Ferlitsch A; Weiss W; Ferlitsch M
Am J Gastroenterol; 2012 Dec; 107(12):1837-48. PubMed ID: 23147522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing screening quality in the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program.
Nadel MR; Royalty J; Shapiro JA; Joseph D; Seeff LC; Lane DS; Dwyer DM
Cancer; 2013 Aug; 119 Suppl 15(0 15):2834-41. PubMed ID: 23868477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The mean number of adenomas per procedure should become the gold standard to measure the neoplasia yield of colonoscopy: a population-based cohort study.
Denis B; Sauleau EA; Gendre I; Exbrayat C; Piette C; Dancourt V; Foll Y; Ait Hadad H; Bailly L; Perrin P
Dig Liver Dis; 2014 Feb; 46(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 24054769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Physician report cards and implementing standards of practice are both significantly associated with improved screening colonoscopy quality.
Keswani RN; Yadlapati R; Gleason KM; Ciolino JD; Manka M; O'Leary KJ; Barnard C; Pandolfino JE
Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Aug; 110(8):1134-9. PubMed ID: 25869388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
