These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25403889)

  • 21. Assessing the surgical skills of trainees in the operating theatre: a prospective observational study of the methodology.
    Beard JD; Marriott J; Purdie H; Crossley J
    Health Technol Assess; 2011 Jan; 15(1):i-xxi, 1-162. PubMed ID: 21227024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Workplace-based assessments in postgraduate medical education: A hermeneutic review.
    Prentice S; Benson J; Kirkpatrick E; Schuwirth L
    Med Educ; 2020 Nov; 54(11):981-992. PubMed ID: 32403200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Trainee doctors' views on workplace-based assessments: Are they just a tick box exercise?
    Bindal T; Wall D; Goodyear HM
    Med Teach; 2011; 33(11):919-27. PubMed ID: 22022902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The usefulness of work-based assessments in higher surgical training: A systematic review.
    Aryal K; Hamed M; Currow C
    Int J Surg; 2021 Oct; 94():106127. PubMed ID: 34597821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A controlled study to determine measurement conditions necessary for a reliable and valid operative performance assessment: a controlled prospective observational study.
    Williams RG; Sanfey H; Chen XP; Dunnington GL
    Ann Surg; 2012 Jul; 256(1):177-87. PubMed ID: 22751518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Technical skills assessment toolbox: a review using the unitary framework of validity.
    Ghaderi I; Manji F; Park YS; Juul D; Ott M; Harris I; Farrell TM
    Ann Surg; 2015 Feb; 261(2):251-62. PubMed ID: 24424150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Validity Evidence for Procedure-specific Competence Assessment Tools in General Surgery: A Scoping Review.
    Ryan JF; Mador B; Lai K; Campbell S; Hyakutake M; Turner SR
    Ann Surg; 2022 Mar; 275(3):482-487. PubMed ID: 34520421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Use of a novel, web-based educational platform facilitates intraoperative training in a surgical oncology fellowship program.
    Roach PB; Roggin KK; Selkov E; Posner MC; Silverstein JC
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 16(5):1100-7. PubMed ID: 19214637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reliability, validity, and feasibility of the Zwisch scale for the assessment of intraoperative performance.
    George BC; Teitelbaum EN; Meyerson SL; Schuller MC; DaRosa DA; Petrusa ER; Petito LC; Fryer JP
    J Surg Educ; 2014; 71(6):e90-6. PubMed ID: 25192794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Analysis of Tools Used in Assessing Technical Skills and Operative Competence in Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgical Training: A Systematic Review.
    James HK; Chapman AW; Pattison GTR; Fisher JD; Griffin DR
    JBJS Rev; 2020 Jun; 8(6):e1900167. PubMed ID: 33006464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The perception of online work-based assessments.
    Basu I; Parvizi S; Chin K
    Clin Teach; 2013 Apr; 10(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 23480106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Validity, reliability, feasibility, acceptability and educational impact of direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS).
    Naeem N
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2013 Jan; 23(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 23286629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mind the Gap: The Prospects of Missing Data.
    McConnell M; Sherbino J; Chan TM
    J Grad Med Educ; 2016 Dec; 8(5):708-712. PubMed ID: 28018535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. International assessment practices along the continuum of surgical training.
    Louridas M; Szasz P; de Montbrun S; Harris KA; Grantcharov TP
    Am J Surg; 2016 Aug; 212(2):354-60. PubMed ID: 27018078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Observational tools for assessment of procedural skills: a systematic review.
    Ahmed K; Miskovic D; Darzi A; Athanasiou T; Hanna GB
    Am J Surg; 2011 Oct; 202(4):469-480.e6. PubMed ID: 21798511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Composite reliability of a workplace-based assessment toolbox for postgraduate medical education.
    Moonen-van Loon JM; Overeem K; Donkers HH; van der Vleuten CP; Driessen EW
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2013 Dec; 18(5):1087-102. PubMed ID: 23494202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Examining the validity argument for the Ottawa Surgical Competency Operating Room Evaluation (OSCORE): a systematic review and narrative synthesis.
    Spencer M; Sherbino J; Hatala R
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2022 Aug; 27(3):659-689. PubMed ID: 35511356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Systematic review to establish absolute standards for technical performance in surgery.
    Goldenberg MG; Garbens A; Szasz P; Hauer T; Grantcharov TP
    Br J Surg; 2017 Jan; 104(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 27686465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Continuous, data-rich appraisal of surgical trainees' operative abilities: a novel approach for measuring performance and providing feedback.
    Roach PB; Roggin KK; Selkov G; Posner MC; Silverstein JC
    J Surg Educ; 2009; 66(5):255-63. PubMed ID: 20005497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Who should set the standards for surgical assessments?
    Sadideen H; Kneebone R
    Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2012 May; 73(5):284-7. PubMed ID: 22585329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.