These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25404169)

  • 1. Experimenting with distributed approaches - Case study: A 'national-level' distributed dialogue on bioenergy in the United Kingdom.
    Entradas M
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):490-8. PubMed ID: 25404169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. From 'trust us' to participatory governance: Deliberative publics and science policy.
    Burgess MM
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 24434712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What is the public's role in 'space' policymaking? Images of the public by practitioners of 'space' communication in the United Kingdom.
    Entradas M
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Jul; 25(5):603-11. PubMed ID: 25926503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Creating a national citizen engagement process for energy policy.
    Pidgeon N; Demski C; Butler C; Parkhill K; Spence A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Sep; 111 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):13606-13. PubMed ID: 25225393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Options for a rational dialogue on the acceptance of biotechnology.
    von Grebmer K; Omamo SW
    Biotechnol J; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1121-8. PubMed ID: 17703485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How to Account for Asymmetries in Deliberative Dialogues Comment on "Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study".
    Jiménez-Pernett J
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2023; 12():7701. PubMed ID: 37579393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Which public and why deliberate?--A scoping review of public deliberation in public health and health policy research.
    Degeling C; Carter SM; Rychetnik L
    Soc Sci Med; 2015 Apr; 131():114-21. PubMed ID: 25770463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhancing Multiple Ways of Knowing Comment on "Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study".
    Boydell KM
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2023; 12():7776. PubMed ID: 37579405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Public attitudes to genomic science: an experiment in information provision.
    Sturgis P; Brunton-Smith I; Fife-Schaw C
    Public Underst Sci; 2010 Mar; 19(2):166-80. PubMed ID: 20533796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Values, objectivity and credibility of scientists in a contentious natural resource debate.
    Yamamoto YT
    Public Underst Sci; 2012 Jan; 21(1):101-25. PubMed ID: 22530490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Who, when, and how? Marine planning stakeholder involvement preferences--a case study of the Solent, United Kingdom.
    Maguire B; Potts J; Fletcher S
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2011 Nov; 62(11):2288-92. PubMed ID: 21903229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ecological validity and the study of publics: The case for organic public engagement methods.
    Gehrke PJ
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 23887250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Public Understanding of Science in turbulent times III: Deficit to dialogue, champions to critics.
    Smallman M
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Feb; 25(2):186-97. PubMed ID: 25234052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reflecting on public engagement and science policy.
    Jones RA
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 24434708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An overview of the role of society and risk in xenotransplantation.
    Sobbrio P; Jorqui M
    Xenotransplantation; 2014; 21(6):523-32. PubMed ID: 25040770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. "... a certain amount of engineering involved": constructing the public in participatory governance arrangements.
    Braun K; Schultz S
    Public Underst Sci; 2010 Jul; 19(4):403-19. PubMed ID: 20977180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Avoiding empty rhetoric: engaging publics in debates about nanotechnologies.
    Kyle R; Dodds S
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2009 Mar; 15(1):81-96. PubMed ID: 18825510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Critiquing imaginaries of 'the public' in UK dialogue around animal research: Insights from the Mass Observation Project.
    McGlacken R; Hobson-West P
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2022 Feb; 91():280-287. PubMed ID: 35016006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A review of the Generic Design Assessment (GDA) Public Dialogue Pilot (2015) for new nuclear build in the UK: lessons for engagement theory and practice.
    Whitton J; Parry I; Grundy C; Lillycrop A; Ross D
    J Radiol Prot; 2016 Jun; 36(2):S23-44. PubMed ID: 27270243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Moving knowledge about family violence into public health policy and practice: a mixed method study of a deliberative dialogue.
    Boyko JA; Kothari A; Wathen CN
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2016 Apr; 14():31. PubMed ID: 27098267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.