267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25404203)
1. Understanding Patient Preferences in Medication Nonadherence: A Review of Stated Preference Data.
Laba TL; Essue B; Kimman M; Jan S
Patient; 2015 Oct; 8(5):385-95. PubMed ID: 25404203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors that affect adherence to bipolar disorder treatments: a stated-preference approach.
Johnson FR; Ozdemir S; Manjunath R; Hauber AB; Burch SP; Thompson TR
Med Care; 2007 Jun; 45(6):545-52. PubMed ID: 17515782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Eliciting Preferences in Dentistry with Multiattribute Stated Preference Methods: A Systematic Review.
Barber S; Pavitt S; Khambay B; Bekker H; Meads D
JDR Clin Trans Res; 2018 Oct; 3(4):326-335. PubMed ID: 30931788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Patients' preferences in the medicamentous treatment of diabetes mellitus type 2: A systematic classification and meta-comparison of patient preference studies].
Mühlbacher AC; Kaczynski A
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2015 Apr; 58(4-5):452-66. PubMed ID: 25687713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Review of Patient Preferences for Osteoporosis Drug Treatment.
Hiligsmann M; Bours SP; Boonen A
Curr Rheumatol Rep; 2015 Sep; 17(9):61. PubMed ID: 26286178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Understanding rational non-adherence to medications. A discrete choice experiment in a community sample in Australia.
Laba TL; Brien JA; Jan S
BMC Fam Pract; 2012 Jun; 13():61. PubMed ID: 22715853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preferences and Stated Adherence for Antibiotic Treatment of Cystic Fibrosis Pseudomonas Infections.
Mohamed AF; Johnson FR; Balp MM; Calado F
Patient; 2016 Feb; 9(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 25838082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What matters in type 2 diabetes mellitus oral treatment? A discrete choice experiment to evaluate patient preferences.
Mühlbacher A; Bethge S
Eur J Health Econ; 2016 Dec; 17(9):1125-1140. PubMed ID: 26682548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Strategies to improve adherence to medications for cardiovascular diseases in socioeconomically disadvantaged populations: a systematic review.
Laba TL; Bleasel J; Brien JA; Cass A; Howard K; Peiris D; Redfern J; Salam A; Usherwood T; Jan S
Int J Cardiol; 2013 Sep; 167(6):2430-40. PubMed ID: 23415168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of patient perceptions and preferences for osteoporosis medication on adherence behavior in the Denosumab Adherence Preference Satisfaction study.
Kendler DL; Macarios D; Lillestol MJ; Moffett A; Satram-Hoang S; Huang J; Kaur P; Tang ET; Wagman RB; Horne R
Menopause; 2014 Jan; 21(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 23676636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving Patient-Centered Care by Assessing Patient Preferences for Multiple Sclerosis Disease-Modifying Agents: A Stated-Choice Experiment.
Carlin CS; Higuera L; Anderson S
Perm J; 2017; 21():16-102. PubMed ID: 28406788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Systematic Review of Discrete-Choice Experiments and Conjoint Analysis Studies in People with Multiple Sclerosis.
Webb EJD; Meads D; Eskyte I; King N; Dracup N; Chataway J; Ford HL; Marti J; Pavitt SH; Schmierer K; Manzano A
Patient; 2018 Aug; 11(4):391-402. PubMed ID: 29313265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A strategy based on patient preference improves the adherence and outcomes of phosphate binders in hemodialysis
.
Arenas Jiménez MD; Parra Moncasi E; Álvarez-Ude Cotera F
Clin Nephrol; 2017 Jul; 88(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 28438255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient Preferences for Injectable Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis in the United States: A Discrete-Choice Experiment.
Poulos C; Kinter E; Yang JC; Bridges JF; Posner J; Reder AT
Patient; 2016 Apr; 9(2):171-80. PubMed ID: 26259849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electronic monitoring to assess adherence with once-daily glaucoma medications and risk factors for nonadherence: the automated dosing reminder study.
Boland MV; Chang DS; Frazier T; Plyler R; Friedman DS
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 132(7):838-44. PubMed ID: 24830878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Physician and patient preferences for dosing options in migraine prevention.
Cowan R; Cohen JM; Rosenman E; Iyer R
J Headache Pain; 2019 May; 20(1):50. PubMed ID: 31072307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Review of medication adherence in children and adults with ADHD.
Adler LD; Nierenberg AA
Postgrad Med; 2010 Jan; 122(1):184-91. PubMed ID: 20107302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Understanding medication compliance and persistence from an economics perspective.
Elliott RA; Shinogle JA; Peele P; Bhosle M; Hughes DA
Value Health; 2008; 11(4):600-10. PubMed ID: 18194403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. One size does not fit all: HIV testing preferences differ among high-risk groups in Northern Tanzania.
Ostermann J; Njau B; Mtuy T; Brown DS; Mühlbacher A; Thielman N
AIDS Care; 2015; 27(5):595-603. PubMed ID: 25616562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Trouble getting started: predictors of primary medication nonadherence.
Fischer MA; Choudhry NK; Brill G; Avorn J; Schneeweiss S; Hutchins D; Liberman JN; Brennan TA; Shrank WH
Am J Med; 2011 Nov; 124(11):1081.e9-22. PubMed ID: 22017787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
