These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25404535)

  • 1. A probabilistic approach to quantify the impact of uncertainty propagation in musculoskeletal simulations.
    Myers CA; Laz PJ; Shelburne KB; Davidson BS
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2015 May; 43(5):1098-111. PubMed ID: 25404535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are subject-specific musculoskeletal models robust to the uncertainties in parameter identification?
    Valente G; Pitto L; Testi D; Seth A; Delp SL; Stagni R; Viceconti M; Taddei F
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112625. PubMed ID: 25390896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensitivity of a subject-specific musculoskeletal model to the uncertainties on the joint axes location.
    Martelli S; Valente G; Viceconti M; Taddei F
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2015; 18(14):1555-63. PubMed ID: 24963785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. To what extent is joint and muscle mechanics predicted by musculoskeletal models sensitive to soft tissue artefacts?
    Lamberto G; Martelli S; Cappozzo A; Mazzà C
    J Biomech; 2017 Sep; 62():68-76. PubMed ID: 27622973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of toe marker placement error on joint kinematics and muscle forces using OpenSim gait simulation.
    Xu H; Merryweather A; Bloswick D; Mao Q; Wang T
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S685-91. PubMed ID: 26406064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of perturbing body segment parameters on calculated joint moments and muscle forces during gait.
    Wesseling M; de Groote F; Jonkers I
    J Biomech; 2014 Jan; 47(2):596-601. PubMed ID: 24332615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of In Vivo Knee Joint Loads Using a Global Probabilistic Analysis.
    Navacchia A; Myers CA; Rullkoetter PJ; Shelburne KB
    J Biomech Eng; 2016 Mar; 138(3):4032379. PubMed ID: 26720096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensitivity of predicted muscle forces during gait to anatomical variability in musculotendon geometry.
    Bosmans L; Valente G; Wesseling M; Van Campen A; De Groote F; De Schutter J; Jonkers I
    J Biomech; 2015 Jul; 48(10):2116-23. PubMed ID: 25979383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An efficient probabilistic methodology for incorporating uncertainty in body segment parameters and anatomical landmarks in joint loadings estimated from inverse dynamics.
    Langenderfer JE; Laz PJ; Petrella AJ; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Feb; 130(1):014502. PubMed ID: 18298193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interpreting Musculoskeletal Models and Dynamic Simulations: Causes and Effects of Differences Between Models.
    Roelker SA; Caruthers EJ; Baker RK; Pelz NC; Chaudhari AMW; Siston RA
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 45(11):2635-2647. PubMed ID: 28779473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Full-Body Musculoskeletal Model for Muscle-Driven Simulation of Human Gait.
    Rajagopal A; Dembia CL; DeMers MS; Delp DD; Hicks JL; Delp SL
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2016 Oct; 63(10):2068-79. PubMed ID: 27392337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of variability in body segment parameters on joint moment using Monte Carlo simulations.
    Nguyen TC; Reynolds KJ
    Gait Posture; 2014; 39(1):346-53. PubMed ID: 24021524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Towards a realistic biomechanical model of the thumb: the choice of kinematic description may be more critical than the solution method or the variability/uncertainty of musculoskeletal parameters.
    Valero-Cuevas FJ; Johanson ME; Towles JD
    J Biomech; 2003 Jul; 36(7):1019-30. PubMed ID: 12757811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are patient-specific joint and inertial parameters necessary for accurate inverse dynamics analyses of gait?
    Reinbolt JA; Haftka RT; Chmielewski TL; Fregly BJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 May; 54(5):782-93. PubMed ID: 17518274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of weak hip abductor muscles on joint contact forces during normal walking: probabilistic modeling analysis.
    Valente G; Taddei F; Jonkers I
    J Biomech; 2013 Sep; 46(13):2186-93. PubMed ID: 23891175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A framework based on subject-specific musculoskeletal models and Monte Carlo simulations to personalize muscle coordination retraining.
    Kainz H; Koller W; Wallnöfer E; Bader TR; Mindler GT; Kranzl A
    Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):3567. PubMed ID: 38347085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A forward-muscular inverse-skeletal dynamics framework for human musculoskeletal simulations.
    S Shourijeh M; Smale KB; Potvin BM; Benoit DL
    J Biomech; 2016 Jun; 49(9):1718-1723. PubMed ID: 27106173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Uncertainty in Limb Configuration Makes Minimal Contribution to Errors Between Observed and Predicted Forces in a Musculoskeletal Model of the Rat Hindlimb.
    Wei Q; Pai DK; Tresch MC
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2018 Feb; 65(2):469-476. PubMed ID: 29346113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity of muscle activation estimated with predicted ground reaction force in inverse dynamics based musculoskeletal simulation during gait.
    Ueno R; Tsuyuki Y; Tohyama H
    J Biomech; 2024 May; 168():112118. PubMed ID: 38677028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of muscle forces in gait using a simulation of the electromyographic activity and numerical optimization.
    Ravera EP; Crespo MJ; Braidot AA
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2016; 19(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 25408069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.