These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

417 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25404669)

  • 21. Methodological challenges when performing a systematic review.
    Anderson NK; Jayaratne YS
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 37(3):248-50. PubMed ID: 25846029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Further statistics in dentistry Part 8: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Petrie A; Bulman JS; Osborn JF
    Br Dent J; 2003 Jan; 194(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 12577072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Understanding and Appraising Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis.
    Mittal N; Goyal M; Mittal PK
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2017; 41(5):317-326. PubMed ID: 28872991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Qualitative research synthesis: methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation.
    Lockwood C; Munn Z; Porritt K
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 26262565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Randomized controlled trial: the gold standard or an unobtainable fallacy?
    Bondemark L; Ruf S
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Oct; 37(5):457-61. PubMed ID: 26136438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dental Students' Use of AMSTAR to Critically Appraise Systematic Reviews.
    Teich ST; Heima M; Lang L
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1031-9. PubMed ID: 26329027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Introduction to cumulative meta-analysis in dentistry: lessons learned from undertaking a cumulative meta-analysis in periodontology.
    Moles DR; Needleman IG; Niederman R; Lau J
    J Dent Res; 2005 Apr; 84(4):345-9. PubMed ID: 15790741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Instructions for aggregated evidence: About reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses (part 2)].
    Günther J; Briel M; Schindler B
    Med Monatsschr Pharm; 2015 Oct; 38(10):401-8. PubMed ID: 26731858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Choice of effect measure for meta-analyses of dichotomous outcomes influenced the identified heterogeneity and direction of small-study effects.
    Papageorgiou SN; Tsiranidou E; Antonoglou GN; Deschner J; Jäger A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 May; 68(5):534-41. PubMed ID: 25666885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. From the five blind men to Cochrane Complementary Medicine systematic reviews.
    Ezzo J
    J Altern Complement Med; 2003 Dec; 9(6):969-72. PubMed ID: 14736367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews.
    Jadad AR; Cook DJ; Browman GP
    CMAJ; 1997 May; 156(10):1411-6. PubMed ID: 9164400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
    Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. PiO interviews: Drs. Baccetti and Franchi on how "to stay safe" when reading the orthodontic literature by Savastano Carmela.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(2):89-91. PubMed ID: 20974444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The methodological quality of individual participant data meta-analysis on intervention effects: systematic review.
    Wang H; Chen Y; Lin Y; Abesig J; Wu IX; Tam W
    BMJ; 2021 Apr; 373():n736. PubMed ID: 33875446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pooling research results: benefits and limitations of meta-analysis.
    Ioannidis JP; Lau J
    Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 1999 Sep; 25(9):462-9. PubMed ID: 10481815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reporting characteristics of meta-analyses in orthodontics: methodological assessment and statistical recommendations.
    Papageorgiou SN; Papadopoulos MA; Athanasiou AE
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Feb; 36(1):74-85. PubMed ID: 23493385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Research synthesis in veterinary science: Narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
    O'Connor A; Sargeant J
    Vet J; 2015 Dec; 206(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 26522692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The role of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of incidence and prevalence studies in neuroepidemiology.
    Fiest KM; Pringsheim T; Patten SB; Svenson LW; Jetté N
    Neuroepidemiology; 2014; 42(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 24356060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evidence-based oral and maxillofacial surgery: some pitfalls and limitations.
    Pitak-Arnnop P; Hemprich A; Pausch NC
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 69(1):252-7. PubMed ID: 21050635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Search strategies in systematic reviews in periodontology and implant dentistry.
    Faggion CM; Atieh MA; Park S
    J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Sep; 40(9):883-8. PubMed ID: 23834263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.