These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25406196)

  • 1. Predicting outcomes in heart transplantation: PET project or actionable data.
    Givertz MM
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Nov; 7(6):857-9. PubMed ID: 25406196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prognostic value of rubidium-82 positron emission tomography in patients after heart transplant.
    Mc Ardle BA; Davies RA; Chen L; Small GR; Ruddy TD; Dwivedi G; Yam Y; Haddad H; Mielniczuk LM; Stadnick E; Hessian R; Guo A; Beanlands RS; deKemp RA; Chow BJ
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Nov; 7(6):930-7. PubMed ID: 25182366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Serial Assessment of Coronary Flow Reserve by Rubidium-82 Positron Emission Tomography Predicts Mortality in Heart Transplant Recipients.
    Feher A; Srivastava A; Quail MA; Boutagy NE; Khanna P; Wilson L; Miller EJ; Liu YH; Lee F; Sinusas AJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Jan; 13(1 Pt 1):109-120. PubMed ID: 30343093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ⁸²Rb PET/CT: entering a new area of myocardial perfusion imaging?
    Valenta I; Schindler TH
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2012 Aug; 39(8):1231-2. PubMed ID: 22652982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Redistribution of myocardial perfusion after coronary sinus reducer implantation demonstrated by rubidium-82 positron emission tomography.
    Cheng K; Tan ST; Wechalekar K; Keramida G; de Silva R
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2024 Mar; 33():101803. PubMed ID: 38219971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantification of myocardial perfusion using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging correlates significantly to rubidium-82 positron emission tomography in patients with severe coronary artery disease: a preliminary study.
    Qayyum AA; Hasbak P; Larsson HBW; Christensen TE; Ghotbi AA; Mathiasen AB; Vejlstrup NG; Kjaer A; Kastrup J
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 83(7):1120-1128. PubMed ID: 24815746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prognostic value of myocardial flow reserve obtained by 82-rubidium positron emission tomography in long-term follow-up after heart transplantation.
    Nelson LM; Christensen TE; Rossing K; Hasbak P; Gustafsson F
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2022 Oct; 29(5):2555-2567. PubMed ID: 34414554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Will the new advantages provided by PET in myocardial perfusion imaging help nuclear cardiology survive the test of time against conventional radiological techniques?
    Caobelli F; Farina D; Pizzocaro C; Guerra UP
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2012 Dec; 39(12):1970-2. PubMed ID: 22926711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Low-dose 3D (82)Rb PET.
    Slomka PJ; Berman DS; Germano G
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2012 Dec; 19(6):1110-2. PubMed ID: 23129187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Added prognostic value of myocardial blood flow quantitation in rubidium-82 positron emission tomography imaging.
    Farhad H; Dunet V; Bachelard K; Allenbach G; Kaufmann PA; Prior JO
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Dec; 14(12):1203-10. PubMed ID: 23660750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How close is close enough?
    Gewirtz H
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Nov; 7(11):1128-9. PubMed ID: 25459594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow Using PET: Joint Position Paper of the SNMMI Cardiovascular Council and the ASNC.
    Murthy VL; Bateman TM; Beanlands RS; Berman DS; Borges-Neto S; Chareonthaitawee P; Cerqueira MD; deKemp RA; DePuey EG; Dilsizian V; Dorbala S; Ficaro EP; Garcia EV; Gewirtz H; Heller GV; Lewin HC; Malhotra S; Mann A; Ruddy TD; Schindler TH; Schwartz RG; Slomka PJ; Soman P; Di Carli MF; Einstein A; Russell R; Corbett JR
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2018 Feb; 25(1):269-297. PubMed ID: 29243073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rubidium-82 cardiac positron emission tomography imaging: an overview for the general cardiologist.
    Dhar R; Ananthasubramaniam K
    Cardiol Rev; 2011; 19(5):255-63. PubMed ID: 21808169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimal Adenosine Stress for Maximum Stress Perfusion, Coronary Flow Reserve, and Pixel Distribution of Coronary Flow Capacity by Kolmogorov-Smirnov Analysis.
    Kitkungvan D; Lai D; Zhu H; Roby AE; Johnson NP; Steptoe DD; Patel MB; Kirkeeide R; Gould KL
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Feb; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 28213449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. To quantify or not to quantify, that is the question: Semi-quantitative vs. visual analysis of Rb-82 myocardial perfusion imaging PET.
    Rischpler C; Kersting D; Nekolla SG
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2022 Dec; 29(6):3163-3165. PubMed ID: 35274212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semi-quantitative myocardial perfusion measured by computed tomography in patients with refractory angina: a head-to-head comparison with quantitative rubidium-82 positron emission tomography as reference.
    Qayyum AA; Kühl JT; Kjaer A; Hasbak P; Kofoed KF; Kastrup J
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2017 Sep; 37(5):481-488. PubMed ID: 26625937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing if adequate hyperemic response to pharmacologic stress in Rb-82 PET myocardial perfusion imaging is achieved: are biomarkers helpful?
    Smith MF
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2022 Dec; 29(6):3218-3220. PubMed ID: 35396644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing changes in severe versus mild perfusion defect size in patients who underwent serial rubidium-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Williams BA; Merhige ME
    Am J Cardiol; 2014 Nov; 114(10):1512-7. PubMed ID: 25260944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of radiolabeled compounds for myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Lin X; Zhang J; Wang X; Tang Z; Zhang X; Lu J
    Curr Pharm Des; 2012; 18(8):1041-57. PubMed ID: 22272824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Research Progress on
    Mou T; Zhang X
    Molecules; 2017 Mar; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 28358340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.