These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25407659)

  • 1. Response dynamics in prospective memory.
    Abney DH; McBride DM; Conte AM; Vinson DW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Aug; 22(4):1020-8. PubMed ID: 25407659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The flexible engagement of monitoring processes in non-focal and focal prospective memory tasks with salient cues.
    Hefer C; Cohen AL; Jaudas A; Dreisbach G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Sep; 179():42-53. PubMed ID: 28711672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Context cue focality influences strategic prospective memory monitoring.
    Hunter Ball B; Bugg JM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Aug; 25(4):1405-1415. PubMed ID: 29435962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective memory and intraindividual variability in ongoing task response times in an adult lifespan sample: the role of cue focality.
    Ihle A; Ghisletta P; Kliegel M
    Memory; 2017 Mar; 25(3):370-376. PubMed ID: 27088610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Response dynamics of event-based prospective memory retrieval in mouse tracking.
    Hicks JL; Spitler SN; Papesh MH
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Jul; 47(5):923-935. PubMed ID: 30783910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of focal and nonfocal cues on the neural correlates of prospective memory: insights from ERPs.
    Cona G; Bisiacchi PS; Moscovitch M
    Cereb Cortex; 2014 Oct; 24(10):2630-46. PubMed ID: 23645716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A thorough examination of cue specificity and task-appropriateness in defining focal and nonfocal prospective memory tasks.
    Lyon BA; Hicks JL
    Memory; 2023 May; 31(5):665-677. PubMed ID: 36945870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Wait a second: Brief delays in responding reduce focality effects in event-based prospective memory.
    Loft S; Remington RW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1432-47. PubMed ID: 23281819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of semantic context on prospective memory performance.
    Thomas BJ; McBride DM
    Memory; 2016; 24(3):315-23. PubMed ID: 25647351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Proactive control processes in event-based prospective memory: Evidence from intraindividual variability and ex-Gaussian analyses.
    Ball BH; Brewer GA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):793-811. PubMed ID: 29239624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fitting an ex-Gaussian function to examine costs in event-based prospective memory: evidence for a continuous monitoring profile.
    Loft S; Bowden VK; Ball BH; Brewer GA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Oct; 152():177-82. PubMed ID: 25247678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The functional neuroanatomy of spontaneous retrieval and strategic monitoring of delayed intentions.
    Beck SM; Ruge H; Walser M; Goschke T
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jan; 52():37-50. PubMed ID: 24200918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of cue salience in prospective memory commission errors in nonperformed nonfocal tasks.
    Mello B; Matos P; Albuquerque PB
    Cogn Process; 2024 Aug; 25(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 38632149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Let it go: the flexible engagement and disengagement of monitoring processes in a non-focal prospective memory task.
    Cohen AL; Gordon A; Jaudas A; Hefer C; Dreisbach G
    Psychol Res; 2017 Mar; 81(2):366-377. PubMed ID: 26820461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Focal/nonfocal cue effects in prospective memory: monitoring difficulty or different retrieval processes?
    Scullin MK; McDaniel MA; Shelton JT; Lee JH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):736-49. PubMed ID: 20438269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retrieval in prospective memory: Multiple processes or just delay?
    Anderson FT; McDaniel MA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Sep; 72(9):2197-2207. PubMed ID: 30957661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The interplay of intention maintenance and cue monitoring in younger and older adults' prospective memory.
    Ballhausen N; Schnitzspahn KM; Horn SS; Kliegel M
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Oct; 45(7):1113-1125. PubMed ID: 28600628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of cue focality on the neural mechanisms of prospective memory: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.
    Cona G; Bisiacchi PS; Sartori G; Scarpazza C
    Sci Rep; 2016 May; 6():25983. PubMed ID: 27185531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of action coordination for prospective memory: Task-interruption demands affect intention realization.
    Rummel J; Wesslein AK; Meiser T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 May; 43(5):717-735. PubMed ID: 27736115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Commission errors in delay-execute prospective memory tasks.
    Schaper P; Grundgeiger T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1423-1438. PubMed ID: 27172855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.