These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25407659)
61. Prospective memory in multiple sclerosis: The impact of cue distinctiveness and executive functioning. Dagenais E; Rouleau I; Tremblay A; Demers M; Roger É; Jobin C; Duquette P Brain Cogn; 2016 Nov; 109():66-74. PubMed ID: 27643953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Automatic Retrieval of Newly Instructed Cue-Task Associations Seen in Task-Conflict Effects in the First Trial after Cue-Task Instructions. Meiran N; Pereg M Exp Psychol; 2017 Jan; 64(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 28219260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Effect of type of cue, type of response, time delay and two different ongoing tasks on prospective memory functioning after acquired brain injury. Raskin SA; Buckheit CA; Waxman A Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2012; 22(1):40-64. PubMed ID: 22181940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. When remembering the past suppresses memory for future actions. Utsumi K; Saito S Memory; 2016; 24(4):437-43. PubMed ID: 25730102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. A comparison of transfer-appropriate processing and multi-process frameworks for prospective memory performance. McBride DM; Abney DH Exp Psychol; 2012; 59(4):190-8. PubMed ID: 22411182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Prospective memory: the combined impact of cognitive load and task focality. Cantarella G; Mastroberardino S; Bisiacchi P; Macaluso E Brain Struct Funct; 2023 Jul; 228(6):1425-1441. PubMed ID: 37356055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Effect of characteristics of target cues on task interference from prospective memory. Chen Y; Huang X; Jackson T; Yang H Neuroreport; 2009 Jan; 20(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 18978643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Ongoing task delays affect prospective memory more powerfully than filler task delays. Martin BA; Brown NL; Hicks JL Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Mar; 65(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 21443330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. The importance of age-related differences in prospective memory: Evidence from diffusion model analyses. Ball BH; Aschenbrenner AJ Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Jun; 25(3):1114-1122. PubMed ID: 28600714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. When we must forget: the effect of cognitive load on prospective memory commission errors. Matos P; Santos FH; Albuquerque PB Memory; 2020 Mar; 28(3):374-385. PubMed ID: 32043427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Inhibitory control in prospective memory: An event related potential comparison of task-switch and dual task processing. Hockey A; Cutmore T Neuropsychologia; 2021 Jul; 158():107906. PubMed ID: 34058173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Effects of cue frequency and repetition on prospective memory: an ERP investigation. Wilson J; Cutmore TR; Wang Y; Chan RC; Shum DH Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Nov; 90(2):250-7. PubMed ID: 23954303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Involvement of the anterior cingulate cortex in time-based prospective memory task monitoring: An EEG analysis of brain sources using Independent Component and Measure Projection Analysis. Cruz G; Burgos P; Kilborn K; Evans JJ PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184037. PubMed ID: 28863146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Rumination and Impaired Prospective Memory. Fredman Stein K; Morys-Carter WL; Hinkley L J Gen Psychol; 2018; 145(3):266-279. PubMed ID: 29851570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Neural bases of prospective memory: a meta-analysis and the "Attention to Delayed Intention" (AtoDI) model. Cona G; Scarpazza C; Sartori G; Moscovitch M; Bisiacchi PS Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2015 May; 52():21-37. PubMed ID: 25704073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. The effect of impulsive personality traits on prospective memory under different task importance conditions. Guo Y; Gan J; Li Y BMC Psychol; 2024 May; 12(1):318. PubMed ID: 38816781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Accumulating evidence about what prospective memory costs actually reveal. Strickland L; Heathcote A; Remington RW; Loft S J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1616-1629. PubMed ID: 28383957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]