These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25407726)

  • 1. Standard error of the genetic correlation: how much data do we need to estimate a purebred-crossbred genetic correlation?
    Bijma P; Bastiaansen JW
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Nov; 46(1):79. PubMed ID: 25407726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pedigree and genomic evaluation of pigs using a terminal-cross model.
    Tusell L; Gilbert H; Riquet J; Mercat MJ; Legarra A; Larzul C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Apr; 48():32. PubMed ID: 27056443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genetic correlation and heritabilities for purebred and crossbred performance in poultry egg production traits.
    Wei M; van der Werf JH
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Aug; 73(8):2220-6. PubMed ID: 8567456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A bivariate genomic model with additive, dominance and inbreeding depression effects for sire line and three-way crossbred pigs.
    Christensen OF; Nielsen B; Su G; Xiang T; Madsen P; Ostersen T; Velander I; Strathe AB
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Aug; 51(1):45. PubMed ID: 31426753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Gene differential expression of liver tissues in crossbred versus purebred chicken and their relationship with heterosis of meat trait].
    Wang D; Zhang Y; Sun DX; Yu Y; Xu GY; Li JY
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2004 Mar; 31(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 15195564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of Predicted Genomic Breeding Values in Purebred and Crossbred Pigs.
    Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Harlizius B; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 May; 5(8):1575-83. PubMed ID: 26019187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relevance of purebred information for predicting genetic merit of survival at birth of crossbred piglets.
    Cecchinato A; de los Campos G; Gianola D; Gallo L; Carnier P
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):481-90. PubMed ID: 19897636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating the purebred-crossbred genetic correlation for uniformity of eggshell color in laying hens.
    Mulder HA; Visscher J; Fablet J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 May; 48(1):39. PubMed ID: 27151311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dissecting total genetic variance into additive and dominance components of purebred and crossbred pig traits.
    Tusell L; Gilbert H; Vitezica ZG; Mercat MJ; Legarra A; Larzul C
    Animal; 2019 Nov; 13(11):2429-2439. PubMed ID: 31120005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing genomic prediction accuracy from purebred, crossbred and combined purebred and crossbred reference populations in sheep.
    Moghaddar N; Swan AA; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):58. PubMed ID: 25927315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlations between purebred and crossbred body weight traits in Limousin and Limousin-Angus populations.
    Lukaszewicz M; Davis R; Bertrand JK; Misztal I; Tsuruta S
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Apr; 93(4):1490-3. PubMed ID: 26020170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Joint evaluation of purebreds and crossbreds in swine.
    Lutaaya E; Misztal I; Mabry JW; Short T; Timm HH; Holzbauer R
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Sep; 80(9):2263-6. PubMed ID: 12350003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variance components and heritabilities for sow productivity traits estimated from purebred versus crossbred sows.
    Ehlers MJ; Mabry JW; Bertrand JK; Stalder KJ
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2005 Oct; 122(5):318-24. PubMed ID: 16191040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimal definition of contemporary groups for crossbred pigs in a joint purebred and crossbred genetic evaluation.
    Steyn Y; Lourenco DA; Chen CY; Valente BD; Holl J; Herring WO; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Jan; 99(1):. PubMed ID: 33313883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inheritance of duration of fertility in female common ducks (Anas platyrhynchos) inseminated in pure breeding or in inter-generic crossbreeding with Muscovy drakes (Cairina moschata).
    Brun JM; Mialon MM; Sellier N; Brillard JP; Rouvier R
    Animal; 2012 Nov; 6(11):1731-7. PubMed ID: 23031599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic correlations between growth performance and carcass traits of purebred and crossbred pigs raised in tropical and temperate climates1.
    Godinho RM; Bergsma R; Silva FF; Sevillano CA; Knol EF; Komen H; Guimarães SEF; Lopes MS; Bastiaansen JWM
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Sep; 97(9):3648-3657. PubMed ID: 31278865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genomic selection in admixed and crossbred populations.
    Toosi A; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Jan; 88(1):32-46. PubMed ID: 19749023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marker-assisted selection for commercial crossbred performance.
    Dekkers JC
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Sep; 85(9):2104-14. PubMed ID: 17504955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maximizing crossbred performance through purebred genomic selection.
    Esfandyari H; Sørensen AC; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Mar; 47(1):16. PubMed ID: 25887297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of sire contribution and breed-of-origin of alleles in a three-way crossbred broiler dataset.
    Calus MPL; Vandenplas J; Hulsegge I; Borg R; Henshall JM; Hawken R
    Poult Sci; 2019 Dec; 98(12):6270-6280. PubMed ID: 31393589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.