These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25407726)

  • 21. Purebred and Crossbred Genomic Evaluation and Mate Allocation Strategies To Exploit Dominance in Pig Crossbreeding Schemes.
    González-Diéguez D; Tusell L; Bouquet A; Legarra A; Vitezica ZG
    G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Aug; 10(8):2829-2841. PubMed ID: 32554752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Genetic evaluation for three-way crossbreeding.
    Christensen OF; Legarra A; Lund MS; Su G
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():98. PubMed ID: 26694257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Genomic evaluation by including dominance effects and inbreeding depression for purebred and crossbred performance with an application in pigs.
    Xiang T; Christensen OF; Vitezica ZG; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Nov; 48(1):92. PubMed ID: 27887565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A crossbred reference population can improve the response to genomic selection for crossbred performance.
    Esfandyari H; Sørensen AC; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47():76. PubMed ID: 26419430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs.
    König S; Swalve HH
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5292-303. PubMed ID: 19762847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A multivariate gametic model for the analysis of purebred and crossbred data. An example between two populations of Iberian pigs.
    Srihi H; López-Carbonell D; Ibáñez-Escriche N; Casellas J; Hernández P; Negro S; Varona L
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2024 Mar; 141(2):153-162. PubMed ID: 37888514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Genomic selection for crossbred performance accounting for breed-specific effects.
    Lopes MS; Bovenhuis H; Hidalgo AM; van Arendonk JAM; Knol EF; Bastiaansen JWM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jun; 49(1):51. PubMed ID: 28651536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Animal board invited review: The purebred-crossbred genetic correlation in poultry.
    Calus MPL; Wientjes YCJ; Bos J; Duenk P
    Animal; 2023 Nov; 17(11):100997. PubMed ID: 37820407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mating structures for genomic selection breeding programs in aquaculture.
    Sonesson AK; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):46. PubMed ID: 27342705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Application of single-step genomic evaluation for crossbred performance in pig.
    Xiang T; Nielsen B; Su G; Legarra A; Christensen OF
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Mar; 94(3):936-48. PubMed ID: 27065256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prediction of the reliability of genomic breeding values for crossbred performance.
    Vandenplas J; Windig JJ; Calus MPL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 May; 49(1):43. PubMed ID: 28499351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Using egg production longitudinal recording to study the genetic background of resilience in purebred and crossbred laying hens.
    Bedere N; Berghof TVL; Peeters K; Pinard-van der Laan MH; Visscher J; David I; Mulder HA
    Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Apr; 54(1):26. PubMed ID: 35439920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison between a sire model and an animal model for genetic evaluation of fertility traits in Danish Holstein population.
    Sun C; Madsen P; Nielsen US; Zhang Y; Lund MS; Su G
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Aug; 92(8):4063-71. PubMed ID: 19620690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Genetic parameter estimates from joint evaluation of purebreds and crossbreds in swine using the crossbred model.
    Lutaaya E; Misztal I; Mabry JW; Short T; Timm HH; Holzbauer R
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Dec; 79(12):3002-7. PubMed ID: 11811453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Optimizing purebred selection to improve crossbred performance.
    Barani S; Miraie Ashtiani SR; Nejati Javaremi A; Khansefid M; Esfandyari H
    Front Genet; 2024; 15():1384973. PubMed ID: 39381139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimating the purebred-crossbred genetic correlation of body weight in broiler chickens with pedigree or genomic relationships.
    Duenk P; Calus MPL; Wientjes YCJ; Breen VP; Henshall JM; Hawken R; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Feb; 51(1):6. PubMed ID: 30782121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. BOARD INVITED REVIEW: The purebred-crossbred correlation in pigs: A review of theory, estimates, and implications.
    Wientjes YCJ; Calus MPL
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Aug; 95(8):3467-3478. PubMed ID: 28805893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Genetic correlations between two strains of Durocs and crossbreds from differing production environments for slaughter traits.
    Zumbach B; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Holl J; Herring W; Long T
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Apr; 85(4):901-8. PubMed ID: 17178815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Genomic prediction of simulated multibreed and purebred performance using observed fifty thousand single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes.
    Kizilkaya K; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):544-51. PubMed ID: 19820059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Genomic BLUP including additive and dominant variation in purebreds and F1 crossbreds, with an application in pigs.
    Vitezica ZG; Varona L; Elsen JM; Misztal I; Herring W; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jan; 48():6. PubMed ID: 26825279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.