These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25408069)

  • 1. Estimation of muscle forces in gait using a simulation of the electromyographic activity and numerical optimization.
    Ravera EP; Crespo MJ; Braidot AA
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2016; 19(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 25408069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Static optimization of muscle forces during gait in comparison to EMG-to-force processing approach.
    Heintz S; Gutierrez-Farewik EM
    Gait Posture; 2007 Jul; 26(2):279-88. PubMed ID: 17071088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contributions to the understanding of gait control.
    Simonsen EB
    Dan Med J; 2014 Apr; 61(4):B4823. PubMed ID: 24814597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of electromyography-assisted modelling in estimating musculotendon forces during gait in children with cerebral palsy.
    Veerkamp K; Schallig W; Harlaar J; Pizzolato C; Carty CP; Lloyd DG; van der Krogt MM
    J Biomech; 2019 Jul; 92():45-53. PubMed ID: 31153626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An EMG-to-force processing approach for determining ankle muscle forces during normal human gait.
    Bogey RA; Perry J; Gitter AJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Sep; 13(3):302-10. PubMed ID: 16200754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A fair and EMG-validated comparison of recruitment criteria, musculotendon models and muscle coordination strategies, for the inverse-dynamics based optimization of muscle forces during gait.
    Michaud F; Lamas M; Lugrís U; Cuadrado J
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 Jan; 18(1):17. PubMed ID: 33509205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation of muscle forces and joint moments using a forward-inverse dynamics model.
    Buchanan TS; Lloyd DG; Manal K; Besier TF
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2005 Nov; 37(11):1911-6. PubMed ID: 16286861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A forward-muscular inverse-skeletal dynamics framework for human musculoskeletal simulations.
    S Shourijeh M; Smale KB; Potvin BM; Benoit DL
    J Biomech; 2016 Jun; 49(9):1718-1723. PubMed ID: 27106173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An EMG-based, muscle driven forward simulation of single support phase of gait.
    Jonkers I; Spaepen A; Papaioannou G; Stewart C
    J Biomech; 2002 May; 35(5):609-19. PubMed ID: 11955500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determination of the correlation between muscle forces obtained from OpenSim and muscle activities obtained from electromyography in the elderly.
    Karimi MT; Hemmati F; Mardani MA; Sharifmoradi K; Hosseini SI; Fadayevatan R; Esrafilian A
    Phys Eng Sci Med; 2021 Mar; 44(1):243-251. PubMed ID: 33559039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inverse dynamic estimates of muscle recruitment and joint contact forces are more realistic when minimizing muscle activity rather than metabolic energy or contact forces.
    Zargham A; Afschrift M; De Schutter J; Jonkers I; De Groote F
    Gait Posture; 2019 Oct; 74():223-230. PubMed ID: 31563823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A physiology-based inverse dynamic analysis of human gait using sequential convex programming: a comparative study.
    De Groote F; Demeulenaere B; Swevers J; De Schutter J; Jonkers I
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2012; 15(10):1093-102. PubMed ID: 21878002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electromyography-Driven Forward Dynamics Simulation to Estimate In Vivo Joint Contact Forces During Normal, Smooth, and Bouncy Gaits.
    Razu SS; Guess TM
    J Biomech Eng; 2018 Jul; 140(7):0710121-8. PubMed ID: 29164228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of predicted knee-joint muscle forces during gait using an instrumented knee implant.
    Kim HJ; Fernandez JW; Akbarshahi M; Walter JP; Fregly BJ; Pandy MG
    J Orthop Res; 2009 Oct; 27(10):1326-31. PubMed ID: 19396858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Towards a realistic biomechanical model of the thumb: the choice of kinematic description may be more critical than the solution method or the variability/uncertainty of musculoskeletal parameters.
    Valero-Cuevas FJ; Johanson ME; Towles JD
    J Biomech; 2003 Jul; 36(7):1019-30. PubMed ID: 12757811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of body weight support variation on muscle activities during robot assisted gait: a dynamic simulation study.
    Hussain S; Jamwal PK; Ghayesh MH
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 May; 20(6):626-635. PubMed ID: 28349768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hybrid neuromusculoskeletal modeling to best track joint moments using a balance between muscle excitations derived from electromyograms and optimization.
    Sartori M; Farina D; Lloyd DG
    J Biomech; 2014 Nov; 47(15):3613-21. PubMed ID: 25458151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of musculotendon geometry variability in muscle forces and hip bone-on-bone forces during walking.
    Martín-Sosa E; Martínez-Reina J; Mayo J; Ojeda J
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0222491. PubMed ID: 31553756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of perturbing body segment parameters on calculated joint moments and muscle forces during gait.
    Wesseling M; de Groote F; Jonkers I
    J Biomech; 2014 Jan; 47(2):596-601. PubMed ID: 24332615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A systematic review of approaches to modelling lower limb muscle forces during gait: Applicability to clinical gait analyses.
    Trinler U; Hollands K; Jones R; Baker R
    Gait Posture; 2018 Mar; 61():353-361. PubMed ID: 29433090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.