273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25408104)
21. Exponential apparent diffusion coefficient in evaluating prostate cancer at 3 T: preliminary experience.
Park SY; Kim CK; Park JJ; Park BK
Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1058):20150470. PubMed ID: 26653866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Whole-Tumor Quantitative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram and Texture Analysis to Predict Gleason Score Upgrading in Intermediate-Risk 3 + 4 = 7 Prostate Cancer.
Rozenberg R; Thornhill RE; Flood TA; Hakim SW; Lim C; Schieda N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Apr; 206(4):775-82. PubMed ID: 27003049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Whole-lesion apparent diffusion coefficient metrics as a marker of percentage Gleason 4 component within Gleason 7 prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
Rosenkrantz AB; Triolo MJ; Melamed J; Rusinek H; Taneja SS; Deng FM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Mar; 41(3):708-14. PubMed ID: 24616064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Non-invasive estimation of prostate cancer aggressiveness using diffusion-weighted MRI and 3D proton MR spectroscopy at 3.0 T.
Thörmer G; Otto J; Horn LC; Garnov N; Do M; Franz T; Stolzenburg JU; Moche M; Kahn T; Busse H
Acta Radiol; 2015 Jan; 56(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 24504488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diffusion-weighted endorectal MR imaging at 3T for prostate cancer: correlation with tumor cell density and percentage Gleason pattern on whole mount pathology.
Glazer DI; Hassanzadeh E; Fedorov A; Olubiyi OI; Goldberger SS; Penzkofer T; Flood TA; Masry P; Mulkern RV; Hirsch MS; Tempany CM; Fennessy FM
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Mar; 42(3):918-925. PubMed ID: 27770164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients at 3.0-T MR imaging and Gleason grade in peripheral zone prostate cancer.
Hambrock T; Somford DM; Huisman HJ; van Oort IM; Witjes JA; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Scheenen T; Barentsz JO
Radiology; 2011 May; 259(2):453-61. PubMed ID: 21502392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient calculation between two-point and multipoint B value analyses in prostate cancer and benign prostate tissue at 3 T: preliminary experience.
Park SY; Kim CK; Park BK; Kwon GY
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W287-94. PubMed ID: 25148186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate: Comparison of b1000 and b2000 image sets for index lesion detection.
Rosenkrantz AB; Hindman N; Lim RP; Das K; Babb JS; Mussi TC; Taneja SS
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Sep; 38(3):694-700. PubMed ID: 23371846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prostate cancer vs. post-biopsy hemorrhage: diagnosis with T2- and diffusion-weighted imaging.
Rosenkrantz AB; Kopec M; Kong X; Melamed J; Dakwar G; Babb JS; Taouli B
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 31(6):1387-94. PubMed ID: 20512891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Quantitative Analysis of Prostate Multiparametric MR Images for Detection of Aggressive Prostate Cancer in the Peripheral Zone: A Multiple Imager Study.
Hoang Dinh A; Melodelima C; Souchon R; Lehaire J; Bratan F; Mège-Lechevallier F; Ruffion A; Crouzet S; Colombel M; Rouvière O
Radiology; 2016 Jul; 280(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 26859255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Initial experience with identifying high-grade prostate cancer using diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) in patients with a Gleason score ≤ 3 + 3 = 6 upon schematic TRUS-guided biopsy: a radical prostatectomy correlated series.
Somford DM; Hambrock T; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Fütterer JJ; van Oort IM; van Basten JP; Karthaus HF; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
Invest Radiol; 2012 Mar; 47(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 22293513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer: correlation of quantitative MR parameters with Gleason score and tumor angiogenesis.
Oto A; Yang C; Kayhan A; Tretiakova M; Antic T; Schmid-Tannwald C; Eggener S; Karczmar GS; Stadler WM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Dec; 197(6):1382-90. PubMed ID: 22109293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Utility of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Cindil E; Oner Y; Sendur HN; Ozdemir H; Gazel E; Tunc L; Cerit MN
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2019 Nov; 70(4):441-451. PubMed ID: 31561925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Differentiation of prostate cancer lesions with high and with low Gleason score by diffusion-weighted MRI.
Barbieri S; Brönnimann M; Boxler S; Vermathen P; Thoeny HC
Eur Radiol; 2017 Apr; 27(4):1547-1555. PubMed ID: 27300199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Mathematical models for diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer using b values up to 2000 s/mm(2) : correlation with Gleason score and repeatability of region of interest analysis.
Toivonen J; Merisaari H; Pesola M; Taimen P; Boström PJ; Pahikkala T; Aronen HJ; Jambor I
Magn Reson Med; 2015 Oct; 74(4):1116-24. PubMed ID: 25329932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Diffusion-weighted MRI of peripheral zone prostate cancer: comparison of tumor apparent diffusion coefficient with Gleason score and percentage of tumor on core biopsy.
Woodfield CA; Tung GA; Grand DJ; Pezzullo JA; Machan JT; Renzulli JF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):W316-22. PubMed ID: 20308476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Periprostatic fat thickness on MRI: correlation with Gleason score in prostate cancer.
Woo S; Cho JY; Kim SY; Kim SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):W43-7. PubMed ID: 25539273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Multiparametric MRI Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Accuracy in Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Pepe P; D'Urso D; Garufi A; Priolo G; Pennisi M; Russo G; Sabini MG; Valastro LM; Galia A; Fraggetta F
In Vivo; 2017; 31(3):415-418. PubMed ID: 28438871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Feasibility of diffusional kurtosis tensor imaging in prostate MRI for the assessment of prostate cancer: preliminary results.
Quentin M; Pentang G; Schimmöller L; Kott O; Müller-Lutz A; Blondin D; Arsov C; Hiester A; Rabenalt R; Wittsack HJ
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Sep; 32(7):880-5. PubMed ID: 24848289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Postoperative Pathology but Misses Aggressive Prostate Cancers as Assessed by Cell Cycle Progression Score.
Renard-Penna R; Cancel-Tassin G; Comperat E; Varinot J; Léon P; Roupret M; Mozer P; Vaessen C; Lucidarme O; Bitker MO; Cussenot O
J Urol; 2015 Dec; 194(6):1617-23. PubMed ID: 26272031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
