632 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25408282)
21. Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone.
O'Toole RV; Andersen RC; Vesnovsky O; Alexander M; Topoleski LD; Nascone JW; Sciadini MF; Turen C; Eglseder WA
J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 18978547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Stress and stability of plate-screw fixation and screw fixation in the treatment of Schatzker type IV medial tibial plateau fracture: a comparative finite element study.
Huang X; Zhi Z; Yu B; Chen F
J Orthop Surg Res; 2015 Nov; 10():182. PubMed ID: 26608217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Plate selection for fixation of extra-articular distal humerus fractures: a biomechanical comparison of three different implants.
Scolaro JA; Hsu JE; Svach DJ; Mehta S
Injury; 2014 Dec; 45(12):2040-4. PubMed ID: 25249244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Biomechanical evaluation of locking plate fixation with hybrid screw constructs in analogue humeri.
Dunlap JT; Lucas GL; Chong AC; Cooke FW; Tiruvadi V
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2011 Feb; 40(2):E20-5. PubMed ID: 21720590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Finite element analysis of different locking plate fixation methods for the treatment of ulnar head fracture.
Zhang Y; Shao Q; Yang C; Ai C; Zhou D; Yu Y; Sun G
J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Mar; 16(1):191. PubMed ID: 33722253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Semi-rigid screws provide an auxiliary option to plate working length to control interfragmentary movement in locking plate fixation at the distal femur.
Heyland M; Duda GN; Haas NP; Trepczynski A; Döbele S; Höntzsch D; Schaser KD; Märdian S
Injury; 2015 Oct; 46 Suppl 4():S24-32. PubMed ID: 26542863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of hybrid plating with locked and nonlocked screws on the strength of locked plating constructs in the osteoporotic diaphysis.
Doornink J; Fitzpatrick DC; Boldhaus S; Madey SM; Bottlang M
J Trauma; 2010 Aug; 69(2):411-7. PubMed ID: 20699751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Ability of modern distal tibia plates to stabilize comminuted pilon fracture fragments: Is dual plate fixation necessary?
Penny P; Swords M; Heisler J; Cien A; Sands A; Cole P
Injury; 2016 Aug; 47(8):1761-9. PubMed ID: 27264277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A biomechanical comparison of short segment long bone fracture fixation techniques: single large fragment plate versus 2 small fragment plates.
Watts A; Weinhold P; Kesler W; Dahners L
J Orthop Trauma; 2012 Sep; 26(9):528-32. PubMed ID: 22377506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Biomechanical properties of a novel fixation system for intra-articular distal humerus fractures: a finite element analysis.
Kong L; Wang Y; Lu Q; Han Y; Wang F
J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Nov; 16(1):674. PubMed ID: 34784932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparative biomechanical study for complex tibial plateau fractures: nailing and compression bolts versus modern and traditional plating.
Lasanianos NG; Garnavos C; Magnisalis E; Kourkoulis S; Babis GC
Injury; 2013 Oct; 44(10):1333-9. PubMed ID: 23601116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Biomechanical comparison of mono- and bicortical screws in an experimentally induced gap fracture.
Demner D; Garcia TC; Serdy MG; Hayashi K; Nir BA; Stover SM
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2014; 27(6):422-9. PubMed ID: 25327936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Biomechanical analysis of plate osteosynthesis systems for proximal humerus fractures.
Lever JP; Aksenov SA; Zdero R; Ahn H; McKee MD; Schemitsch EH
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Jan; 22(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 18176161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Proximal Screw Configuration Alters Peak Plate Strain Without Changing Construct Stiffness in Comminuted Supracondylar Femur Fractures.
McLachlin S; Kreder H; Ng M; Jenkinson R; Whyne C; Larouche J
J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Dec; 31(12):e418-e424. PubMed ID: 28902085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Use of a "hybrid" locking plate for complex metaphyseal fractures and nonunions about the humerus.
Spitzer AB; Davidovitch RI; Egol KA
Injury; 2009 Mar; 40(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 19195653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Crutch weightbearing on comminuted humeral shaft fractures: a biomechanical comparison of large versus small fragment fixation for humeral shaft fractures.
Patel R; Neu CP; Curtiss S; Fyhrie DP; Yoo B
J Orthop Trauma; 2011 May; 25(5):300-5. PubMed ID: 21464747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Implant Material, Type of Fixation at the Shaft, and Position of Plate Modify Biomechanics of Distal Femur Plate Osteosynthesis.
Kandemir U; Augat P; Konowalczyk S; Wipf F; von Oldenburg G; Schmidt U
J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Aug; 31(8):e241-e246. PubMed ID: 28394844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Influence of hooks and a lag screw on internal fixation plates for lateral malleolar fracture: a biomechanical and ergonomic study.
Sakai R; Uchino M; Yoneo T; Ohtaki Y; Minehara H; Matsuura T; Gomi T; Ujihira M
J Orthop Surg Res; 2017 Feb; 12(1):34. PubMed ID: 28228100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Biomechanical comparison of screw-based zones of a spatial subchondral support plate for proximal humerus fractures.
Jabran A; Peach C; Zou Z; Ren L
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2019 Mar; 233(3):372-382. PubMed ID: 30700217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Biomechanical in vitro assessment of screw augmentation in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures.
Röderer G; Scola A; Schmölz W; Gebhard F; Windolf M; Hofmann-Fliri L
Injury; 2013 Oct; 44(10):1327-32. PubMed ID: 23769470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]