146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25408596)
1. Accuracy and reproducibility of probe forces during simulated periodontal pocket depth measurements.
Al Shayeb KN; Turner W; Gillam DG
Saudi Dent J; 2014 Apr; 26(2):50-5. PubMed ID: 25408596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In-vitro accuracy and reproducibility evaluation of probing depth measurements of selected periodontal probes.
Al Shayeb KN; Turner W; Gillam DG
Saudi Dent J; 2014 Jan; 26(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 24526824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro accuracy and reproducibility of automated and conventional periodontal probes.
Samuel ED; Griffiths GS; Petrie A
J Clin Periodontol; 1997 May; 24(5):340-5. PubMed ID: 9178114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The accuracy of the Vivacare true pressure-sensitive periodontal probe system in terms of probing force.
Bergenholtz A; al-Harbi N; al-Hummayani FM; Anton P; al-Kahtani S
J Clin Periodontol; 2000 Feb; 27(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 10703653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy and reproducibility of two manual periodontal probes. An in vitro study.
Buduneli E; Aksoy O; Köse T; Atilla G
J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Oct; 31(10):815-9. PubMed ID: 15367182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Periodontal probe precision using 4 different periodontal probes.
Mayfield L; Bratthall G; Attström R
J Clin Periodontol; 1996 Feb; 23(2):76-82. PubMed ID: 8849842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative evaluation of accuracy of periodontal probing depth and attachment levels using a Florida probe versus traditional probes.
Gupta N; Rath SK; Lohra P
Med J Armed Forces India; 2015 Oct; 71(4):352-8. PubMed ID: 26663963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of two pressure-sensitive periodontal probes and a manual periodontal probe in shallow and deep pockets.
Rams TE; Slots J
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1993 Dec; 13(6):520-9. PubMed ID: 8181912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of the cemento-enamel junction with three different probes: an "in vitro" model.
Barendregt DS; van der Velden U; Timmerman MF; Bulthuis HM; van der Weijden F
J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Mar; 36(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 19196382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproducibility of periodontal probing using a conventional manual and an automated force-controlled electronic probe.
Wang SF; Leknes KN; Zimmerman GJ; Sigurdsson TJ; Wikesjö UM; Selvig KA
J Periodontol; 1995 Jan; 66(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 7891248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of two automated periodontal probes and two probes with a conventional readout in periodontal maintenance patients.
Barendregt DS; Van der Velden U; Timmerman MF; van der Weijden GA
J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Apr; 33(4):276-82. PubMed ID: 16553636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative evaluation of probing depth and clinical attachment level using a manual probe and Florida probe.
Kour A; Kumar A; Puri K; Khatri M; Bansal M; Gupta G
J Indian Soc Periodontol; 2016; 20(3):299-306. PubMed ID: 27563204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility of manual probing depth.
Andrade R; Espinoza M; Gómez EM; Espinoza JR; Cruz E
Braz Oral Res; 2012; 26(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 22344339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intra - and inter-examiner reproducibility in constant force probing.
Wang SF; Leknes KN; Zimmerman GJ; Sigurdsson TJ; Wikesjö UM; Selvig KA
J Clin Periodontol; 1995 Dec; 22(12):918-22. PubMed ID: 8613559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation between electronic and visual readings of pocket depths with a newly developed constant force probe.
Magnusson I; Fuller WW; Heins PJ; Rau CF; Gibbs CH; Marks RG; Clark WB
J Clin Periodontol; 1988 Mar; 15(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 3162464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Level of patient comfort and measurement reproducibility of three different probes: A cross-sectional study.
Flores-Rodrigo D; Meza-Mauricio J; Retamal-Valdes B; Mayta-Tovalino F; Mendoza-Azpur G
Int J Dent Hyg; 2022 May; 20(2):301-307. PubMed ID: 34390316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reproducibility of clinical attachment level and probing depth of a manual probe and a computerized electronic probe.
Alves Rde V; Machion L; Andia DC; Casati MZ; Sallum AW; Sallum EA
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2005 Jan; 7(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 15736893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Millimeter marks and probe tip diameter standardisation from commercially available periodontal probes. A comparative study.
Neto JB; Filho GR; Tramontina VA; Sallum EA; Nociti FH; Sallum AW
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2001 Jul; 3(3):57-60. PubMed ID: 12666942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of Intra- and Inter-examiner Reproducibility of Probing Depth Measurements with a Manual Periodontal Probe.
Lafzi A; Mohammadi AS; Eskandari A; Pourkhamneh S
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2007; 1(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 23277829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
