These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25408596)

  • 21. Reproducibility of Probing Depth Measurements Using a Constant-Force Electronic Probe: Analysis of Inter- and Intraexaminer Variability.
    Araujo MWB; Benedek KM; Benedek JR; Grossi SG; Dorn J; Wactawski-Wende J; Genco RJ; Trevisan M
    J Periodontol; 2003 Dec; 74(12):1736-1740. PubMed ID: 29539079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Comparative probing with an electronic and a manual periodontal probe].
    Becherer CF; Rateitschak KH; Hefti AF
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1993; 103(6):715-21. PubMed ID: 8322056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reproducibility and validity of the assessment of clinical furcation parameters as related to different probes.
    Eickholz P; Kim TS
    J Periodontol; 1998 Mar; 69(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 9579619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Controlled force measurements of gingival attachment level made with the Toronto automated probe using electronic guidance.
    Karim M; Birek P; McCulloch CA
    J Clin Periodontol; 1990 Sep; 17(8):594-600. PubMed ID: 2212091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical evaluation of electronic and manual constant force probes.
    Khocht A; Chang KM
    J Periodontol; 1998 Jan; 69(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 9527557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An assessment of the validity of a constant force electronic probe in measuring probing depths.
    Hull PS; Clerehugh V; Ghassemi-Aval A
    J Periodontol; 1995 Oct; 66(10):848-51. PubMed ID: 8537866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of probing force on the reproducibility of pocket depth measurements.
    van der Velden U; de Vries JH
    J Clin Periodontol; 1980 Oct; 7(5):414-20. PubMed ID: 6936414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Periodontal probing: probe tip diameter.
    Garnick JJ; Silverstein L
    J Periodontol; 2000 Jan; 71(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 10695944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reproducibility of peri-implant probing using a force-controlled probe.
    Eickholz P; Grotkamp FL; Steveling H; Mühling J; Staehle HJ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Apr; 12(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 11251665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy of probing attachment levels using a CEJ probe versus traditional probes.
    Karpinia K; Magnusson I; Gibbs C; Yang MC
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 15016020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of periodontal and peri-implant probing by depth-force pattern analysis.
    Mombelli A; Mühle T; Brägger U; Lang NP; Bürgin WB
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997 Dec; 8(6):448-54. PubMed ID: 9555203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sources of error for periodontal probing measurements.
    Grossi SG; Dunford RG; Ho A; Koch G; Machtei EE; Genco RJ
    J Periodontal Res; 1996 Jul; 31(5):330-6. PubMed ID: 8858537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reproducibility of probing depth measurement by an experimental periodontal probe incorporating optical fiber sensor.
    Ishihata K; Wakabayashi N; Wadachi J; Akizuki T; Izumi Y; Takakuda K; Igarashi Y
    J Periodontol; 2012 Feb; 83(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 21574830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical evaluation of a constant force electronic probe.
    Quirynen M; Callens A; van Steenberghe D; Nys M
    J Periodontol; 1993 Jan; 64(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 8426288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical evaluation of tine shape of 3 periodontal probes using 2 probing forces.
    Barendregt DS; Van der Velden U; Reiker J; Loos BG
    J Clin Periodontol; 1996 Apr; 23(4):397-402. PubMed ID: 8739173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Periodontal probing.
    Hefti AF
    Crit Rev Oral Biol Med; 1997; 8(3):336-56. PubMed ID: 9260047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [The accuracy of probing depth measurements of undergraduate students and associated factors analysis].
    Feng XH; Zhang L; Hu WJ; Meng HX
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Jul; 48(7):388-92. PubMed ID: 24262041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Validity of a hinged constant force probe and a similar, immobilised probe in untreated periodontal disease.
    Simons P; Watts T
    J Clin Periodontol; 1987 Nov; 14(10):581-7. PubMed ID: 3480294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The reproducibility and validity of furcation measurements using a pressure-calibrated probe.
    Kim TS; Knittel M; Staehle HJ; Eickholz P
    J Clin Periodontol; 1996 Sep; 23(9):826-31. PubMed ID: 8891933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Microscopic evaluation of pocket depth measurements performed with six different probing forces in dogs.
    van der Velden U; Jansen J
    J Clin Periodontol; 1981 Apr; 8(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 6941978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.