These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25409435)

  • 21. Psychometric function for NU-6 word recognition in noise: effects of first language and dominant language.
    Shi LF; Zaki NA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):236-45. PubMed ID: 24556968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of companding on speech recognition in quiet and noise for listeners with ANSD.
    Narne VK; Barman A; Deepthi M
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 24237041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Vowel identification in temporal-modulated noise for native and non-native listeners: Effect of language experience.
    Guan J; Liu C; Tao S; Mi L; Wang W; Dong Q
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):1670-7. PubMed ID: 26428804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cross-language differences in informational masking of speech by speech: English versus Mandarin Chinese.
    Wu X; Yang Z; Huang Y; Chen J; Li L; Daneman M; Schneider BA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 54(6):1506-24. PubMed ID: 22180019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The intelligibility of Lombard speech for non-native listeners.
    Cooke M; Lecumberri ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1120-9. PubMed ID: 22894231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Contribution of linguistic variables to bilingual listeners' perception of degraded English sentences.
    Shi LF
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Feb; 55(1):219-34. PubMed ID: 22199200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A music perception disorder (congenital amusia) influences speech comprehension.
    Liu F; Jiang C; Wang B; Xu Y; Patel AD
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jan; 66():111-8. PubMed ID: 25445781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
    Norin JA; Emanuel DC; Letowski TR
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Speech recognition for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant modes in the presence of uncorrelated noise sources.
    Ricketts TA; Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Haynes DS; Labadie RF
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):763-73. PubMed ID: 17086085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An Italian matrix sentence test for the evaluation of speech intelligibility in noise.
    Puglisi GE; Warzybok A; Hochmuth S; Visentin C; Astolfi A; Prodi N; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():44-50. PubMed ID: 26371592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bilingual listeners' perception of temporally manipulated English passages.
    Shi LF; Farooq N
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Feb; 55(1):125-38. PubMed ID: 22199197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. New sentence recognition materials developed using a basic non-native English lexicon.
    Calandruccio L; Smiljanic R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Oct; 55(5):1342-55. PubMed ID: 22411279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of Native and Non-Native Multitalker Babble on Speech Recognition in Noise.
    Jain C; Konadath S; Vimal BM; Suresh V
    Audiol Res; 2014 Mar; 4(1):89. PubMed ID: 26557350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Modulation masking release using the Brazilian-Portuguese HINT: psychometric functions and the effect of speech time compression.
    Grose JH; Griz S; Pacífico FA; Advíncula KP; Menezes DC
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Apr; 54(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 25630394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evidence against the mismatched interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit hypothesis.
    Stibbard RM; Lee JI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jul; 120(1):433-42. PubMed ID: 16875239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The foreign language cocktail party problem: Energetic and informational masking effects in non-native speech perception.
    Cooke M; Garcia Lecumberri ML; Barker J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):414-27. PubMed ID: 18177170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A Spanish matrix sentence test for assessing speech reception thresholds in noise.
    Hochmuth S; Brand T; Zokoll MA; Castro FZ; Wardenga N; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jul; 51(7):536-44. PubMed ID: 22537033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Age Impacts Speech-in-Noise Recognition Differently for Nonnative and Native Listeners.
    Phillips I; Bieber RE; Dirks C; Grant KW; Brungart DS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 May; 67(5):1602-1623. PubMed ID: 38569080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.