These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25409518)

  • 21. A coordinate system for visual motion perception.
    Darling WG; Pizzimenti MA
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Nov; 141(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 11713629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Determinants of motion response anisotropies in human early visual cortex: the role of configuration and eccentricity.
    Maloney RT; Watson TL; Clifford CW
    Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 100():564-79. PubMed ID: 24996120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Direction repulsion in unfiltered and ring-filtered Julesz textures.
    Lindsey DT
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Feb; 63(2):226-40. PubMed ID: 11281098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Ambiguity in the perception of moving stimuli is resolved in favour of the cardinal axes.
    Andrews TJ; Schluppeck D
    Vision Res; 2000; 40(25):3485-93. PubMed ID: 11115675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Psychophysical evidence for interactions between visual motion and form processing at the level of motion integrating receptive fields.
    Mather G; Pavan A; Bellacosa RM; Casco C
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jan; 50(1):153-9. PubMed ID: 22120007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Orthogonal motion after-effect illusion predicted by a model of cortical motion processing.
    Grunewald A; Lankheet MJ
    Nature; 1996 Nov; 384(6607):358-60. PubMed ID: 8934521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Radial biases in the processing of motion and motion-defined contours by human visual cortex.
    Clifford CW; Mannion DJ; McDonald JS
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Nov; 102(5):2974-81. PubMed ID: 19759326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Temporal dynamics of decision-making during motion perception in the visual cortex.
    Grossberg S; Pilly PK
    Vision Res; 2008 Jun; 48(12):1345-73. PubMed ID: 18452967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dynamic capture of sound motion by light stimuli moving in three-dimensional space.
    Kitajima N; Yamashita Y
    Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Dec; 89(3 Pt 2):1139-58. PubMed ID: 10710763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Oblique effects beyond low-level visual processing.
    Heinrich SP; Aertsen A; Bach M
    Vision Res; 2008 Mar; 48(6):809-18. PubMed ID: 18249436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The direction aftereffect is driven by adaptation of local motion detectors.
    Curran W; Clifford CW; Benton CP
    Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(25):4270-8. PubMed ID: 17034831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Perceptual manifestations of fast neural plasticity: motion priming, rapid motion aftereffect and perceptual sensitization.
    Kanai R; Verstraten FA
    Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(25-26):3109-16. PubMed ID: 16023173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Independent sources of anisotropy in visual orientation representation: a visual and a cognitive oblique effect.
    Balikou P; Gourtzelidis P; Mantas A; Moutoussis K; Evdokimidis I; Smyrnis N
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Nov; 233(11):3097-108. PubMed ID: 26226929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Motion streaks provide a spatial code for motion direction.
    Geisler WS
    Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6739):65-9. PubMed ID: 10403249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Visual motion aftereffect in human cortical area MT revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging.
    Tootell RB; Reppas JB; Dale AM; Look RB; Sereno MI; Malach R; Brady TJ; Rosen BR
    Nature; 1995 May; 375(6527):139-41. PubMed ID: 7753168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Motion adaptation in area MT.
    Van Wezel RJ; Britten KH
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Dec; 88(6):3469-76. PubMed ID: 12466461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. But Still It Moves: Static Image Statistics Underlie How We See Motion.
    Rideaux R; Welchman AE
    J Neurosci; 2020 Mar; 40(12):2538-2552. PubMed ID: 32054676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evidence for tilt normalization can be explained by anisotropic orientation sensitivity.
    Storrs KR; Arnold DH
    J Vis; 2015 Jan; 15(1):15.1.26. PubMed ID: 25624465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Feature-based attention influences contextual interactions during motion repulsion.
    Tzvetanov T; Womelsdorf T; Niebergall R; Treue S
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(21):3651-8. PubMed ID: 16828839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Anisotropy in the representation of direction preferences in cat area 18.
    Ribot J; Tanaka S; O'Hashi K; Ajima A
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 May; 27(10):2773-80. PubMed ID: 18489580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.