These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 254101)

  • 1. Are the targets right?
    Nurs Times; 1979 Mar; 75(12):475. PubMed ID: 254101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Jay recommendations.
    Nurs Times; 1979 Mar; 75(10):392-4. PubMed ID: 254072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An alternative to Jay.
    Hicks C
    Nurs Times; 1980 Feb; 76(9):939. PubMed ID: 6899194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A formula for growth.
    Dopson L
    Nurs Times; 1979 May; 75(21):861. PubMed ID: 255957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The choice is yours.
    Bosanquet N
    Nurs Mirror; 1979 Apr; 148(15):7-8. PubMed ID: 254925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Counting the cost of Jay.
    Brown A
    Nurs Mirror; 1979 Mar; 148(11):4-5. PubMed ID: 254178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Jumping ahead with Jay.
    Altschul A
    Nurs Mirror; 1979 Apr; 148(19):17-9. PubMed ID: 254934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Newsmakers: the challenge of Jay.
    Oswin M
    Nurs Times; 1979 Mar; 75(11):435-6. PubMed ID: 254091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Care-giving within boundaries.
    Greenhalgh K
    Nurs Mirror; 1979 Jun; 148(23):24. PubMed ID: 256098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Newsmakers: Peggy Jay: bête noire or Messiah?
    Jay P
    Nurs Times; 1979 Mar; 75(11):434-5. PubMed ID: 254090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Jay Report critique--1. Why the recommendations will not succeed.
    Bavin J
    Nurs Times; 1979 May; 75(20):821-5. PubMed ID: 255949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. No way, Mrs Jay: don't disband the RNMS--improve it!
    Hosking G
    Nurs Mirror; 1979 Mar; 148(13):7. PubMed ID: 254211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Jay Report critique--2: The Gloucestershire project.
    Bavin J
    Nurs Times; 1979 May; 75(21):887-90. PubMed ID: 255960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Facing the facts.
    Savage D; Ellis S
    Nurs Times; 1979 Apr; 75(16):655. PubMed ID: 255249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Jay report: what chance implementation?
    Williams D
    Nurs Times; 1979 Mar; 75(11):429. PubMed ID: 254089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 'No' to the Jay training proposals.
    Nurs Mirror; 1979 Oct; 149(17):7. PubMed ID: 260141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The challenge to subnormality nursing.
    O'Shea MC
    Nurs Times; 1972 Mar; 68(12):354-5. PubMed ID: 5015771
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Royal College of Nursing. Note concern.
    Parrish A
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1987 Feb; (483):4. PubMed ID: 3643473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mental subnormality nursing--the need for change.
    Metson BH
    Nurs Times; 1966 Dec; 62(52):1714-5. PubMed ID: 5953905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mental subnormality nursing.
    Nurs Times; 1967 Nov; 63(47):1569. PubMed ID: 6060653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.