These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25410481)

  • 1. Twelve Tips for programmatic assessment.
    Van Der Vleuten CPM; Schuwirth LWT; Driessen EW; Govaerts MJB; Heeneman S
    Med Teach; 2015 Jul; 37(7):641-646. PubMed ID: 25410481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stakes in the eye of the beholder: an international study of learners' perceptions within programmatic assessment.
    Schut S; Driessen E; van Tartwijk J; van der Vleuten C; Heeneman S
    Med Educ; 2018 Jun; 52(6):654-663. PubMed ID: 29572920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose.
    van der Vleuten CP; Schuwirth LW; Driessen EW; Dijkstra J; Tigelaar D; Baartman LK; van Tartwijk J
    Med Teach; 2012; 34(3):205-14. PubMed ID: 22364452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An application of programmatic assessment for learning (PAL) system for general practice training.
    Schuwirth L; Valentine N; Dilena P
    GMS J Med Educ; 2017; 34(5):Doc56. PubMed ID: 29226224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the issue of costs in programmatic assessment.
    van der Vleuten CP; Heeneman S
    Perspect Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 5(5):303-7. PubMed ID: 27638392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shaping the right conditions in programmatic assessment: how quality of narrative information affects the quality of high-stakes decision-making.
    de Jong LH; Bok HGJ; Schellekens LH; Kremer WDJ; Jonker FH; van der Vleuten CPM
    BMC Med Educ; 2022 May; 22(1):409. PubMed ID: 35643442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A practical approach to programmatic assessment design.
    Timmerman AA; Dijkstra J
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2017 Dec; 22(5):1169-1182. PubMed ID: 28120259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incorporating aspects of programmatic assessment into examinations: Aggregating rich information to inform decision-making.
    Pearce J; Reid K; Chiavaroli N; Hyam D
    Med Teach; 2021 May; 43(5):567-574. PubMed ID: 33556294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of programmatic assessment on student learning: theory versus practice.
    Heeneman S; Oudkerk Pool A; Schuwirth LW; van der Vleuten CP; Driessen EW
    Med Educ; 2015 May; 49(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 25924124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ottawa 2020 consensus statements for programmatic assessment - 2. Implementation and practice.
    Torre D; Rice NE; Ryan A; Bok H; Dawson LJ; Bierer B; Wilkinson TJ; Tait GR; Laughlin T; Veerapen K; Heeneman S; Freeman A; van der Vleuten C
    Med Teach; 2021 Oct; 43(10):1149-1160. PubMed ID: 34330202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Student progress decision-making in programmatic assessment: can we extrapolate from clinical decision-making and jury decision-making?
    Tweed M; Wilkinson T
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 May; 19(1):176. PubMed ID: 31146714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Learning culture and feedback: an international study of medical athletes and musicians.
    Watling C; Driessen E; van der Vleuten CP; Lingard L
    Med Educ; 2014 Jul; 48(7):713-23. PubMed ID: 24909533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment for Systems Learning: A Holistic Assessment Framework to Support Decision Making Across the Medical Education Continuum.
    Bowe CM; Armstrong E
    Acad Med; 2017 May; 92(5):585-592. PubMed ID: 27465232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ottawa 2020 consensus statement for programmatic assessment - 1. Agreement on the principles.
    Heeneman S; de Jong LH; Dawson LJ; Wilkinson TJ; Ryan A; Tait GR; Rice N; Torre D; Freeman A; van der Vleuten CPM
    Med Teach; 2021 Oct; 43(10):1139-1148. PubMed ID: 34344274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Changing Medical School IT to Support Medical Education Transformation.
    Spickard A; Ahmed T; Lomis K; Johnson K; Miller B
    Teach Learn Med; 2016; 28(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 26787088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Learner-Created Virtual Patient Curriculum for Surgical Residents: Successes and Failures.
    McKendy KM; Posel N; Fleiszer DM; Vassiliou MC
    J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(4):559-66. PubMed ID: 27142719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptions of purpose, value, and process of the mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise in anesthesia training.
    Castanelli DJ; Jowsey T; Chen Y; Weller JM
    Can J Anaesth; 2016 Dec; 63(12):1345-1356. PubMed ID: 27663452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Designing quality course management systems that foster intra-professional education.
    Bowers HF
    Nurse Educ Today; 2006 Dec; 26(8):726-31. PubMed ID: 17011082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inter-professional in-situ simulated team and resuscitation training for patient safety: Description and impact of a programmatic approach.
    Zimmermann K; Holzinger IB; Ganassi L; Esslinger P; Pilgrim S; Allen M; Burmester M; Stocker M
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Oct; 15():189. PubMed ID: 26511721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Programmatic Assessment of a Comprehensive Quality Improvement Curriculum in an Otolaryngology Residency.
    Bowe SN; Laury AM; Kepchar JJ; Lospinoso J
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Nov; 155(5):729-732. PubMed ID: 27301903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.