389 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25411863)
1. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring interpretation in labour: a critical appraisal.
Maso G; Piccoli M; De Seta F; Parolin S; Banco R; Camacho Mattos L; Bogatti P; Alberico S
Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Feb; 67(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 25411863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the prevention of perinatal brain injury.
Graham EM; Petersen SM; Christo DK; Fox HE
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):656-66. PubMed ID: 16946228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Continuous cardiotocography during labour: Analysis, classification and management.
Pinas A; Chandraharan E
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Jan; 30():33-47. PubMed ID: 26165747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: a national survey.
Devane D; Lalor J; Bonnar J
Ir Med J; 2007 Feb; 100(2):360-2. PubMed ID: 17432809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intrapartum fetal monitoring.
Cahill AG; Spain J
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jun; 58(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 25811127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation.
Vintzileos AM; Antsaklis A; Varvarigos I; Papas C; Sofatzis I; Montgomery JT
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 8497353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The future of electronic fetal monitoring.
Knupp RJ; Andrews WW; Tita ATN
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Aug; 67():44-52. PubMed ID: 32299728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation: a meta-analysis.
Vintzileos AM; Nochimson DJ; Guzman ER; Knuppel RA; Lake M; Schifrin BS
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jan; 85(1):149-55. PubMed ID: 7800313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of availability of fetal ECG monitoring on operative deliveries.
Kale A; Chong YS; Biswas A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(11):1189-93. PubMed ID: 19016356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The importance of the learning process in ST analysis interpretation and its impact in improving clinical and neonatal outcomes.
Timonen S; Holmberg K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):620.e1-620.e7. PubMed ID: 29577914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are we (mis)guided by current guidelines on intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring? Case for a more physiological approach to interpretation.
Ugwumadu A
BJOG; 2014 Aug; 121(9):1063-70. PubMed ID: 24920154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computerized analysis of cardiotocograms and ST signals is associated with significant reductions in hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy and cesarean delivery: an observational study in 38,466 deliveries.
Lopes-Pereira J; Costa A; Ayres-De-Campos D; Costa-Santos C; Amaral J; Bernardes J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):269.e1-269.e8. PubMed ID: 30594567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Delay in intervention increases neonatal morbidity in births monitored with cardiotocography and ST-waveform analysis.
Kessler J; Moster D; Albrechtsen S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Feb; 93(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 24251909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intrapartum monitoring with cardiotocography and ST-waveform analysis in breech presentation: an observational study.
Kessler J; Moster D; Albrechtsen S
BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):528-35. PubMed ID: 25040705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Safely lowering the emergency Cesarean and operative vaginal delivery rates using the Fetal Reserve Index.
Eden RD; Evans MI; Britt DW; Evans SM; Schifrin BS
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 May; 33(9):1473-1479. PubMed ID: 30269624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. ST analysis of fetal electrocardiography in labor.
Amer-Wåhlin I; Maršál K
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Feb; 16(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 21115414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What we have learned about intrapartum fetal monitoring trials in the MFMU Network.
Bloom SL; Belfort M; Saade G;
Semin Perinatol; 2016 Aug; 40(5):307-17. PubMed ID: 27140936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Combined monitoring of labor: maternal and neonatal results].
Goeschen K
Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1992; 196(3):103-5. PubMed ID: 1496843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intermittent Auscultation for Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Surveillance (replaces ACNM Clinical Bulletin #9, March 2007).
American College of Nurse-Midwives
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2010; 55(4):397-403. PubMed ID: 20630370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Auscultation of the fetal heart presents advantages over electronic monitoring.
Sandmire HF; DeMott RK
Wis Med J; 1995 Dec; 94(12):661-3. PubMed ID: 8571614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
