BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

905 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25412094)

  • 1. High quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria is not dependent on endoscopist specialty or setting.
    Kozbial K; Reinhart K; Heinze G; Zwatz C; Bannert C; Salzl P; Waldmann E; Britto-Arias M; Ferlitsch A; Trauner M; Weiss W; Ferlitsch M
    Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 25412094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trends in quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria.
    Waldmann E; Gessl I; Sallinger D; Jeschek P; Britto-Arias M; Heinze G; Fasching E; Weiss W; Gschwantler M; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M
    Endoscopy; 2016 Dec; 48(12):1102-1109. PubMed ID: 27576182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screening colonoscopy: High quality regardless of endoscopist specialty.
    Sapci I; Aiello A; Gorgun E; Rizk M; Delaney CP; Steele SR; Valente MA
    Am J Surg; 2019 Mar; 217(3):442-444. PubMed ID: 30268418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality of colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy).
    Zorzi M; Senore C; Da Re F; Barca A; Bonelli LA; Cannizzaro R; Fasoli R; Di Furia L; Di Giulio E; Mantellini P; Naldoni C; Sassatelli R; Rex D; Hassan C; Zappa M;
    Gut; 2015 Sep; 64(9):1389-96. PubMed ID: 25227521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Endoscopist specialty is associated with colonoscopy quality.
    Jiang M; Sewitch MJ; Barkun AN; Joseph L; Hilsden RJ
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2013 May; 13():78. PubMed ID: 23638769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nonneoplastic polypectomy during screening colonoscopy: the impact on polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and overall cost.
    Atia MA; Patel NC; Ratuapli SK; Boroff ES; Crowell MD; Gurudu SR; Faigel DO; Leighton JA; Ramirez FC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Aug; 82(2):370-375.e1. PubMed ID: 25843614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sedation in screening colonoscopy: impact on quality indicators and complications.
    Bannert C; Reinhart K; Dunkler D; Trauner M; Renner F; Knoflach P; Ferlitsch A; Weiss W; Ferlitsch M
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2012 Dec; 107(12):1837-48. PubMed ID: 23147522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Volume and accreditation, but not specialty, affect quality standards in colonoscopy.
    Bhangu A; Bowley DM; Horner R; Baranowski E; Raman S; Karandikar S
    Br J Surg; 2012 Oct; 99(10):1436-44. PubMed ID: 22961527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Forceps versus snare polypectomies in colorectal cancer screening: are we adhering to the guidelines?
    Britto-Arias M; Waldmann E; Jeschek P; Gessl I; Sallinger D; Bannert C; Weber M; Trauner M; Weiss W; Ferlitsch A; Ferlitsch M
    Endoscopy; 2015 Oct; 47(10):898-902. PubMed ID: 26115462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of cecal intubation and adenoma detection between hospitals can provide incentives to improve quality of colonoscopy.
    Belderbos TD; Grobbee EJ; van Oijen MG; Meijssen MA; Ouwendijk RJ; Tang TJ; ter Borg F; van der Schaar P; Le Fèvre DM; Stouten MT; van der Galiën O; Hiemstra TJ; de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel WH; ter Borg PC; Spaander MC; Moons LM; Kuipers EJ; Siersema PD
    Endoscopy; 2015 Aug; 47(8):703-9. PubMed ID: 26090725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modifiable endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies.
    Jover R; Zapater P; Polanía E; Bujanda L; Lanas A; Hermo JA; Cubiella J; Ono A; González-Méndez Y; Peris A; Pellisé M; Seoane A; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Ponce M; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Fernández-Díez S; Arenas J; Sopeña F; de-Castro L; Vega-Villaamil P; Rodríguez-Soler M; Carballo F; Salas D; Morillas JD; Andreu M; Quintero E; Castells A;
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):381-389.e1. PubMed ID: 23218945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures.
    Kahi CJ; Ballard D; Shah AS; Mears R; Johnson CS
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):925-31. PubMed ID: 23472996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The performance indicator of colonic intubation (PICI) in a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program.
    Lund M; Erichsen R; Njor SH; Laurberg S; Valori R; Andersen B
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Sep; 54(9):1176-1181. PubMed ID: 31498716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fellowship Colonoscopy Training and Preparedness for Independent Gastroenterology Practice.
    Patwardhan VR; Feuerstein JD; Sengupta N; Lewandowski JJ; Tsao R; Kothari D; Anastopoulos HT; Doyle RB; Leffler DA; Sheth SG
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2016 Jan; 50(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 26125461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of a nationwide screening colonoscopy program for colorectal cancer.
    Pox CP; Altenhofen L; Brenner H; Theilmeier A; Von Stillfried D; Schmiegel W
    Gastroenterology; 2012 Jun; 142(7):1460-7.e2. PubMed ID: 22446606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of the Adenoma Detection Rate From the Polyp Detection Rate by Using a Conversion Factor in a Predominantly Hispanic Population.
    Elhanafi S; Ortiz AM; Yarlagadda A; Tsai C; Eloliby M; Mallawaarachchi I; Dwivedi A; Zuckerman MJ; Othman MO
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015 Aug; 49(7):589-93. PubMed ID: 26035518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
    Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Weiss JE; Robinson CM
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 28153571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Endoscopist characteristics that influence the quality of colonoscopy.
    Jover R; Zapater P; Bujanda L; Hernández V; Cubiella J; Pellisé M; Ponce M; Ono A; Lanas A; Seoane A; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Fernández-Díez S; Peris A; Nicolás-Pérez D; Murcia O; Castells A; Quintero E;
    Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 26845473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adenoma detection rates in an opportunistic screening colonoscopy program in Iran, a country with rising colorectal cancer incidence.
    Delavari A; Bishehsari F; Salimzadeh H; Khosravi P; Delavari F; Nasseri-Moghaddam S; Merat S; Ansari R; Vahedi H; Shahbazkhani B; Saberifiroozi M; Sotoudeh M; Malekzadeh R
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2014 Nov; 14():196. PubMed ID: 25404264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The mean number of adenomas per procedure should become the gold standard to measure the neoplasia yield of colonoscopy: a population-based cohort study.
    Denis B; Sauleau EA; Gendre I; Exbrayat C; Piette C; Dancourt V; Foll Y; Ait Hadad H; Bailly L; Perrin P
    Dig Liver Dis; 2014 Feb; 46(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 24054769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 46.