281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25413411)
1. Comparison of prostate proton treatment planning technique, interfraction robustness, and analysis of single-field treatment feasibility.
Kirk ML; Tang S; Zhai H; Vapiwala N; Deville C; James P; Bekelman JE; Christodouleas JP; Tochner Z; Both S
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2015; 5(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 25413411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of intrafraction and residual interfraction effect on prostate proton pencil beam scanning.
Tang S; Deville C; Tochner Z; Wang KK; McDonough J; Vapiwala N; Both S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Dec; 90(5):1186-94. PubMed ID: 25442043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of intrafraction prostate motion on proton pencil beam scanning delivery: a quantitative assessment.
Tang S; Deville C; McDonough J; Tochner Z; Wang KK; Vapiwala N; Both S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Oct; 87(2):375-82. PubMed ID: 23958148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated proton therapy optimization techniques for pediatric craniopharyngiomas: a clinical case study.
Yeung D; McKenzie C; Indelicato DJ
Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2014 Jan; 61(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 24000229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A single-field integrated boost treatment planning technique for spot scanning proton therapy.
Zhu XR; Poenisch F; Li H; Zhang X; Sahoo N; Wu RY; Li X; Lee AK; Chang EL; Choi S; Pugh T; Frank SJ; Gillin MT; Mahajan A; Grosshans DR
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Sep; 9():202. PubMed ID: 25212571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A treatment planning comparison of intensity modulated photon and proton therapy for paraspinal sarcomas.
Weber DC; Trofimov AV; Delaney TF; Bortfeld T
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Apr; 58(5):1596-606. PubMed ID: 15050341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anatomical robust optimization to account for nasal cavity filling variation during intensity-modulated proton therapy: a comparison with conventional and adaptive planning strategies.
van de Water S; Albertini F; Weber DC; Heijmen BJM; Hoogeman MS; Lomax AJ
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(2):025020. PubMed ID: 29160775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. SU-E-T-561: A Comparative Study of Single Verses Two Field Daily Fraction for Treatment of Prostate Cancer Using IMPT, Double-Scattered, and SUFD Delivery Technique.
Arjomandy B; Schultz T; Park S; Gayar H
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part19):3834. PubMed ID: 28517092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Technical Note: Treatment planning system (TPS) approximations matter - comparing intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plan quality and robustness between a commercial and an in-house developed TPS for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Liu C; Yu NY; Shan J; Bhangoo RS; Daniels TB; Chiang JS; Ding X; Lara P; Patrick CL; Archuleta JP; DeWees T; Hu Y; Schild SE; Bues M; Sio TT; Liu W
Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):4755-4762. PubMed ID: 31498885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An in silico planning study comparing doses and estimated risk of toxicity in 3D-CRT, IMRT and proton beam therapy of patients with thymic tumours.
Lideståhl A; Mondlane G; Gubanski M; Lind PA; Siegbahn A
Phys Med; 2019 Apr; 60():120-126. PubMed ID: 31000071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of gastric-cancer radiotherapy performed with volumetric modulated arc therapy or single-field uniform-dose proton therapy.
Mondlane G; Gubanski M; Lind PA; Ureba A; Siegbahn A
Acta Oncol; 2017 Jun; 56(6):832-838. PubMed ID: 28281357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric impact of systematic spot position errors in spot scanning proton therapy of head and neck tumor.
Yasui K; Omi Y; Shimomura A; Muramatsu R; Iwata H; Ogino H; Hayashi N
J Cancer Res Ther; 2023 Apr; 19(Supplement):S0. PubMed ID: 37147973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The rationale for intensity-modulated proton therapy in geometrically challenging cases.
Safai S; Trofimov A; Adams JA; Engelsman M; Bortfeld T
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6337-53. PubMed ID: 23965339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feasibility of MRI-only treatment planning for proton therapy in brain and prostate cancers: Dose calculation accuracy in substitute CT images.
Koivula L; Wee L; Korhonen J
Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4634. PubMed ID: 27487880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Potentials of robust intensity modulated scanning proton plans for locally advanced lung cancer in comparison to intensity modulated photon plans.
Stuschke M; Kaiser A; Pöttgen C; Lübcke W; Farr J
Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jul; 104(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 22560714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Benchmarking of a treatment planning system for spot scanning proton therapy: comparison and analysis of robustness to setup errors of photon IMRT and proton SFUD treatment plans of base of skull meningioma.
Harding R; Trnková P; Weston SJ; Lilley J; Thompson CM; Short SC; Loughrey C; Cosgrove VP; Lomax AJ; Thwaites DI
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111710. PubMed ID: 25370624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Helical tomotherapy and intensity modulated proton therapy in the treatment of dominant intraprostatic lesion: a treament planning comparison.
Fellin F; Azzeroni R; Maggio A; Lorentini S; Cozzarini C; Di Muzio N; Fiorino C; Calandrino R; Schwarz M
Radiother Oncol; 2013 May; 107(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 23541644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Proton pencil beam scanning for mediastinal lymphoma: treatment planning and robustness assessment.
Zeng C; Plastaras JP; James P; Tochner ZA; Hill-Kayser CE; Hahn SM; Both S
Acta Oncol; 2016; 55(9-10):1132-1138. PubMed ID: 27332881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of linear and nonlinear programming approaches for "worst case dose" and "minmax" robust optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy dose distributions.
Zaghian M; Cao W; Liu W; Kardar L; Randeniya S; Mohan R; Lim G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):15-25. PubMed ID: 28300378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Monte-Carlo study to assess the effect of 1.5 T magnetic fields on the overall robustness of pencil-beam scanning proton radiotherapy plans for prostate cancer.
Kurz C; Landry G; Resch AF; Dedes G; Kamp F; Ganswindt U; Belka C; Raaymakers BW; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Oct; 62(21):8470-8482. PubMed ID: 29047455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
