These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
798 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25413443)
21. Unilateral positive biopsies in low risk prostate cancer patients diagnosed with extended transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy schemes do not predict unilateral prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy. Gallina A; Maccagnano C; Suardi N; Capitanio U; Abdollah F; Raber M; Salonia A; Scattoni V; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E64-8. PubMed ID: 22093108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The presence of positive surgical margins in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer results in biochemical recurrence at a similar rate to that in patients with extracapsular extension and PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml. Eminaga O; Hinkelammert R; Titze U; Abbas M; Eltze E; Bettendorf O; Semjonow A Urol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 32(1):32.e17-25. PubMed ID: 23434425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prediction of outcome following early salvage radiotherapy among patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Briganti A; Karnes RJ; Joniau S; Boorjian SA; Cozzarini C; Gandaglia G; Hinkelbein W; Haustermans K; Tombal B; Shariat S; Sun M; Karakiewicz PI; Montorsi F; Van Poppel H; Wiegel T Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):479-86. PubMed ID: 24345725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A genomic classifier improves prediction of metastatic disease within 5 years after surgery in node-negative high-risk prostate cancer patients managed by radical prostatectomy without adjuvant therapy. Klein EA; Yousefi K; Haddad Z; Choeurng V; Buerki C; Stephenson AJ; Li J; Kattan MW; Magi-Galluzzi C; Davicioni E Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):778-86. PubMed ID: 25466945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Nomogram Predicting Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality for Men with Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy. Brockman JA; Alanee S; Vickers AJ; Scardino PT; Wood DP; Kibel AS; Lin DW; Bianco FJ; Rabah DM; Klein EA; Ciezki JP; Gao T; Kattan MW; Stephenson AJ Eur Urol; 2015 Jun; 67(6):1160-1167. PubMed ID: 25301759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Favorable risk factors in patients with positive surgical margin after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Ha YS; Kang DI; Kim JH; Joung JY; Yu J; Parihar JS; Salmasi AH; Horie S; Kim WJ; Yi Kim I Can J Urol; 2014 Jun; 21(3):7290-7. PubMed ID: 24978359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparative analysis of oncologic outcomes for open vs. robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer. Lee D; Choi SK; Park J; Shim M; Kim A; Lee S; Song C; Ahn H Korean J Urol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):572-9. PubMed ID: 26279826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score. Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Long-term cancer control outcomes in patients with clinically high-risk prostate cancer treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results from a multi-institutional study of 1100 patients. Abdollah F; Sood A; Sammon JD; Hsu L; Beyer B; Moschini M; Gandaglia G; Rogers CG; Haese A; Montorsi F; Graefen M; Briganti A; Menon M Eur Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(3):497-505. PubMed ID: 26119559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The CPC Risk Calculator: A New App to Predict Prostate-specific Antigen Recurrence During Follow-up After Radical Prostatectomy. Røder MA; Berg KD; Loft MD; Thomsen FB; Ferrari M; Kurbegovic S; Rytgaard HC; Gruschy L; Brasso K; Gerds TA; Kjær A; Brooks JD; Iversen P Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Apr; 4(3):360-368. PubMed ID: 28753827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Patterns and predictors of early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and adjuvant radiation therapy in men with pT3N0 prostate cancer: implications for multimodal therapies. Briganti A; Joniau S; Gandaglia G; Cozzarini C; Sun M; Tombal B; Haustermans K; Hinkelbein W; Shariat SF; Karakiewicz PI; Montorsi F; Van Poppel H; Wiegel T Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Dec; 87(5):960-7. PubMed ID: 24351411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. External validation of nomogram predicting the probability of specimen-confined disease (pT2-3a, R0N0) in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection. Mearini L; Gacci M; Saleh O; De Nunzio C; Schiavina R; Simonato A; Tubaro A; Carmignani G; Mirone V; Carini M; Bini V; Porena M; Urol Int; 2014; 93(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 24356093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Complications and outcomes of salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single-institution experience. Yuh B; Ruel N; Muldrew S; Mejia R; Novara G; Kawachi M; Wilson T BJU Int; 2014 May; 113(5):769-76. PubMed ID: 24314031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparative analysis of three risk assessment tools in Australian patients with prostate cancer. Tamblyn DJ; Chopra S; Yu C; Kattan MW; Pinnock C; Kopsaftis T BJU Int; 2011 Nov; 108 Suppl 2():51-6. PubMed ID: 22085129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The extent of pelvic lymph node dissection correlates with the biochemical recurrence rate in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. Schiavina R; Manferrari F; Garofalo M; Bertaccini A; Vagnoni V; Guidi M; Borghesi M; Baccos A; Morselli-Labate AM; Concetti S; Martorana G BJU Int; 2011 Oct; 108(8):1262-8. PubMed ID: 21446934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Percentage of high-grade tumour volume does not meaningfully improve prediction of early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy compared with Gleason score. Hansen J; Bianchi M; Sun M; Rink M; Castiglione F; Abdollah F; Steuber T; Ahyai SA; Steurer S; Göbel C; Freschi M; Montorsi F; Shariat SF; Fisch M; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI; Briganti A; Chun FK BJU Int; 2014 Mar; 113(3):399-407. PubMed ID: 24053339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Nomogram predicting the probability of early recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Walz J; Chun FK; Klein EA; Reuther A; Saad F; Graefen M; Huland H; Karakiewicz PI J Urol; 2009 Feb; 181(2):601-7; discussion 607-8. PubMed ID: 19084864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Long-term data on the survival of patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy in the prostate-specific antigen era. Isbarn H; Wanner M; Salomon G; Steuber T; Schlomm T; Köllermann J; Sauter G; Haese A; Heinzer H; Huland H; Graefen M BJU Int; 2010 Jul; 106(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 20002667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome. De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cross-cultural validation of a prognostic tool: example of the Kattan preoperative nomogram as a predictor of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Rouprêt M; Hupertan V; Comperat E; Drouin SJ; Phé V; Xylinas E; Demanse D; Sibony M; Richard F; Cussenot O BJU Int; 2009 Sep; 104(6):813-7; discussion 817-8. PubMed ID: 19254280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]