These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25413718)

  • 1. Better know when (not) to think twice: how social power impacts prefactual thought.
    Scholl A; Sassenberg K
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Feb; 41(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 25413718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prefactual potency: the perceived likelihood of alternatives to anticipated realities.
    Petrocelli JV; Seta CE; Seta JJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Nov; 38(11):1467-79. PubMed ID: 22872413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving Physical Task Performance with Counterfactual and Prefactual Thinking.
    Hammell C; Chan AY
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0168181. PubMed ID: 27942041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Defensive pessimism, optimism, and simulating alternatives: some ups and downs of prefactual and counterfactual thinking.
    Sanna LJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1996 Nov; 71(5):1020-36. PubMed ID: 8939045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Highly identified power-holders feel responsible: The interplay between social identification and social power within groups.
    Scholl A; Sassenberg K; Ellemers N; Scheepers D; de Wit F
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2018 Jan; 57(1):112-129. PubMed ID: 28983928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Powerful postures versus powerful roles: which is the proximate correlate of thought and behavior?
    Huang L; Galinsky AD; Gruenfeld DH; Guillory LE
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Jan; 22(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 21149853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving the past and the future: a temporal asymmetry in hypothetical thinking.
    Ferrante D; Girotto V; Stragà M; Walsh C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Feb; 142(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 22468671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Power and affordances: when the situation has more power over powerful than powerless individuals.
    Guinote A
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Aug; 95(2):237-52. PubMed ID: 18665700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. "While you still think, I already type": experienced social power reduces deliberation during e-mail communication.
    Scholl A; Sassenberg K
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2014 Nov; 17(11):692-6. PubMed ID: 25286277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. It might become true: How prefactual thinking licenses dishonesty.
    Helgason BA; Effron DA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2022 Nov; 123(5):909-940. PubMed ID: 35420865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Counterfactual and prefactual conditionals.
    Byrne RM; Egan SM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2004 Jun; 58(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15285601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does power magnify the expression of dispositions?
    Guinote A; Weick M; Cai A
    Psychol Sci; 2012 May; 23(5):475-82. PubMed ID: 22431909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. I am my (high-power) role: power and role identification.
    Joshi PD; Fast NJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Jul; 39(7):898-910. PubMed ID: 23613123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. "It's not my fault--but only I can change it": counterfactual and prefactual thoughts of managers.
    Goerke M; Moller J; Schulz-Hardt S; Napiersky U; Frey D
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Apr; 89(2):279-92. PubMed ID: 15065975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. From Power to Inaction.
    Durso GR; Briñol P; Petty RE
    Psychol Sci; 2016 Dec; 27(12):1660-1666. PubMed ID: 27770058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Power increases hypocrisy: moralizing in reasoning, immorality in behavior.
    Lammers J; Stapel DA; Galinsky AD
    Psychol Sci; 2010 May; 21(5):737-44. PubMed ID: 20483854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A matter of focus: Power-holders feel more responsible after adopting a cognitive other-focus, rather than a self-focus.
    Scholl A; Sassenberg K; Scheepers D; Ellemers N; de Wit F
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2017 Mar; 56(1):89-102. PubMed ID: 27900793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Imaginary alternatives: The effects of mental simulation on powerless negotiators.
    Schaerer M; Schweinsberg M; Swaab RI
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2018 Jul; 115(1):96-117. PubMed ID: 29595292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Power and the creation of patronizing environments: the stereotype-based behaviors of the powerful and their effects on female performance in masculine domains.
    Vescio TK; Gervais SJ; Snyder M; Hoover A
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2005 Apr; 88(4):658-72. PubMed ID: 15796666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of the self-concept and the social context in determining the behavior of power holders: self-construal in intergroup versus dyadic dispute resolution negotiations.
    Howard ES; Gardner WL; Thompson L
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Oct; 93(4):614-31. PubMed ID: 17892335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.