282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25414065)
1. An assessment of the new generation three-dimensional high definition laparoscopic vision system on surgical skills: a randomized prospective study.
Usta TA; Ozkaynak A; Kovalak E; Ergul E; Naki MM; Kaya E
Surg Endosc; 2015 Aug; 29(8):2305-13. PubMed ID: 25414065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-Dimensional (3D) Versus Two-Dimensional (2D) Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: a Single-Surgeon Prospective Randomized Comparative Study.
Currò G; La Malfa G; Caizzone A; Rampulla V; Navarra G
Obes Surg; 2015 Nov; 25(11):2120-4. PubMed ID: 25893652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Skills Comparison in Pediatric Residents Using a 2-Dimensional versus a 3-Dimensional High-Definition Camera in a Pediatric Laparoscopic Simulator.
Guanà R; Ferrero L; Garofalo S; Cerrina A; Cussa D; Arezzo A; Schleef J
J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(4):644-649. PubMed ID: 28039097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect on surgical skills of expert surgeons using 3D/HD and 2D/4K resolution monitors in laparoscopic phantom tasks.
Harada H; Kanaji S; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Matsuda Y; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Oshikiri T; Sumi Y; Nakamura T; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y
Surg Endosc; 2018 Oct; 32(10):4228-4234. PubMed ID: 29603005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-Dimensional Versus Two-Dimensional Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy.
Currò G; Cogliandolo A; Bartolotta M; Navarra G
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2016 Mar; 26(3):213-7. PubMed ID: 26863202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is a robotic system really better than the three-dimensional laparoscopic system in terms of suturing performance?: comparison among operators with different levels of experience.
Park YS; Oo AM; Son SY; Shin DJ; Jung DH; Ahn SH; Park DJ; Kim HH
Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1485-90. PubMed ID: 26139502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Novice surgeons: do they benefit from 3D laparoscopy?
Özsoy M; Kallidonis P; Kyriazis I; Panagopoulos V; Vasilas M; Sakellaropoulos GC; Liatsikos E
Lasers Med Sci; 2015 May; 30(4):1325-33. PubMed ID: 25772250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-Dimensional Versus Two-Dimensional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Is Surgeon Experience Relevant?
Currò G; La Malfa G; Lazzara S; Caizzone A; Fortugno A; Navarra G
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2015 Jul; 25(7):566-70. PubMed ID: 26076180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 2D Versus 3D in Laparoscopic Surgery by Beginners and Experts: A Randomized Controlled Trial on a Pelvitrainer in Objectively Graded Surgical Steps.
Spille J; Wenners A; von Hehn U; Maass N; Pecks U; Mettler L; Alkatout I
J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(5):867-877. PubMed ID: 28215494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of passive polarizing three-dimensional displays on surgical performance for experienced laparoscopic surgeons.
Smith R; Schwab K; Day A; Rockall T; Ballard K; Bailey M; Jourdan I
Br J Surg; 2014 Oct; 101(11):1453-9. PubMed ID: 25131843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional (3D) versus two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopic adrenalectomy: A case-control study.
Agrusa A; di Buono G; Chianetta D; Sorce V; Citarrella R; Galia M; Vernuccio L; Romano G; Gulotta G
Int J Surg; 2016 Apr; 28 Suppl 1():S114-7. PubMed ID: 26708842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional Laparoscopy: Does Improved Visualization Decrease the Learning Curve Among Trainees in Advanced Procedures?
Cologne KG; Zehetner J; Liwanag L; Cash C; Senagore AJ; Lipham JC
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2015 Aug; 25(4):321-3. PubMed ID: 26053113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the impact of three-dimensional vision on laparoscopic performance.
Lusch A; Bucur PL; Menhadji AD; Okhunov Z; Liss MA; Perez-Lanzac A; McDougall EM; Landman J
J Endourol; 2014 Feb; 28(2):261-6. PubMed ID: 24059674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-Dimensional (3D) Laparoscopy Versus Two-Dimensional (2D) Laparoscopy: A Single-Surgeon Prospective Randomized Comparative Study.
Wang Z; Liang J; Chen J; Mei S; Liu Q
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2020 Oct; 21(10):2883-2887. PubMed ID: 33112544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 3-Dimensional (3D) laparoscopy improves operating time in small spaces without impact on hemodynamics and psychomental stress parameters of the surgeon.
Feng X; Morandi A; Boehne M; Imvised T; Ure BM; Kuebler JF; Lacher M
Surg Endosc; 2015 May; 29(5):1231-9. PubMed ID: 25673344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of three-dimensional high-definition laparoscopic surgery for gynaecology.
Usta TA; Gundogdu EC
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Aug; 27(4):297-301. PubMed ID: 26107783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The learning effect of using stereoscopic vision in the early phase of laparoscopic surgical training for novices.
Harada H; Kanaji S; Nishi M; Otake Y; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Matsuda Y; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Oshikiri T; Sumi Y; Nakamura T; Suzuki S; Sato Y; Kakeji Y
Surg Endosc; 2018 Feb; 32(2):582-588. PubMed ID: 28643059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Learning Laparoscopic Surgery Skills With a 4K Ultra-High Definition 2D vs a Three-Dimensional HD Laparoscopic System: Results From a Prospective Randomized Trial.
Thomaschewski M; Jürgens T; Keck T; Laubert T; Benecke C
Surg Innov; 2021 Dec; 28(6):760-767. PubMed ID: 33530845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional imaging improves surgical skill performance in a laparoscopic test model for both experienced and novice laparoscopic surgeons.
Mashiach R; Mezhybovsky V; Nevler A; Gutman M; Ziv A; Khaikin M
Surg Endosc; 2014 Dec; 28(12):3489-93. PubMed ID: 24962860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Distraction and proficiency in laparoscopy: 2D versus robotic console 3D immersion.
Kim S; May A; Ryan H; Mohsin A; Tsuda S
Surg Endosc; 2017 Nov; 31(11):4625-4630. PubMed ID: 28409364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
