128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25414653)
1. A face for all seasons: Searching for context-specific leadership traits and discovering a general preference for perceived health.
Spisak BR; Blaker NM; Lefevre CE; Moore FR; Krebbers KF
Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():792. PubMed ID: 25414653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Warriors and peacekeepers: testing a biosocial implicit leadership hypothesis of intergroup relations using masculine and feminine faces.
Spisak BR; Dekker PH; Krüger M; van Vugt M
PLoS One; 2012; 7(1):e30399. PubMed ID: 22276190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Looking like a leader-facial shape predicts perceived height and leadership ability.
Re DE; Hunter DW; Coetzee V; Tiddeman BP; Xiao D; DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Perrett DI
PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e80957. PubMed ID: 24324651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Distinctive Facial Cues Predict Leadership Rank and Selection.
Re DE; Rule N
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1311-1322. PubMed ID: 28903679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perception of Emergent Leaders' Faces and Evolution of Social Cheating: Cross-Cultural Experiments.
Rostovtseva VV; Mezentseva AA; Butovskaya ML
Evol Psychol; 2022; 20(1):14747049221081733. PubMed ID: 35238674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The perception of attractiveness and trustworthiness in male faces affects hypothetical voting decisions differently in wartime and peacetime scenarios.
Little AC; Roberts SC; Jones BC; Debruine LM
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(10):2018-32. PubMed ID: 22650610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Context-specific effects of facial dominance and trustworthiness on hypothetical leadership decisions.
Ferguson HS; Owen A; Hahn AC; Torrance J; DeBruine LM; Jones BC
PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0214261. PubMed ID: 31356614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Facial cues to perceived height influence leadership choices in simulated war and peace contexts.
Re DE; DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Perrett DI
Evol Psychol; 2013 Jan; 11(1):89-103. PubMed ID: 23372088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of facial adiposity on attractiveness and perceived leadership ability.
Re DE; Perrett DI
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):676-86. PubMed ID: 23971489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Voting for a Male Warrior or Female Peacekeeper? Testing the Evolutionary Contingency Hypothesis in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Elections.
Grabo A; van Vugt M
Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704918773267. PubMed ID: 29911423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Influence of Body Composition Effects on Male Facial Masculinity and Attractiveness.
Lei X; Holzleitner IJ; Perrett DI
Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2658. PubMed ID: 30662423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The masculinity paradox: facial masculinity and beardedness interact to determine women's ratings of men's facial attractiveness.
Dixson BJ; Sulikowski D; Gouda-Vossos A; Rantala MJ; Brooks RC
J Evol Biol; 2016 Nov; 29(11):2311-2320. PubMed ID: 27488414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Eyelid-openness and mouth curvature influence perceived intelligence beyond attractiveness.
Talamas SN; Mavor KI; Axelsson J; Sundelin T; Perrett DI
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 May; 145(5):603-620. PubMed ID: 26913618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Male facial attractiveness and masculinity may provide sex- and culture-independent cues to semen quality.
Soler C; Kekäläinen J; Núñez M; Sancho M; Álvarez JG; Núñez J; Yaber I; Gutiérrez R
J Evol Biol; 2014 Sep; 27(9):1930-8. PubMed ID: 25056484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Leader esteem for the least preferred co-worker score, training, and effectiveness: an experimental examination.
Chemers MM; Rice RW; Sundstrom E; Butler WM
J Pers Soc Psychol; 1975 Mar; 31(3):401-9. PubMed ID: 1151609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Social Transmission of Leadership Preference: Knowledge of Group Membership and Partisan Media Reporting Moderates Perceptions of Leadership Ability From Facial Cues to Competence and Dominance.
Watkins CD; Xiao D; Perrett DI
Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2996. PubMed ID: 32010029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlated Preferences for Male Facial Masculinity and Partner Traits in Gay and Bisexual Men in China.
Zheng L; Zheng Y
Arch Sex Behav; 2015 Jul; 44(5):1423-30. PubMed ID: 25331614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perceived leader integrity as a mediator between ethical leadership and ethical climate in a teaching context.
Enwereuzor IK; Onyishi IE; Albi-Oparaocha FC; Amaeshi K
BMC Psychol; 2020 May; 8(1):52. PubMed ID: 32434553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of mating context and fecundability in women's preferences for men's facial masculinity and beardedness.
Dixson BJW; Blake KR; Denson TF; Gooda-Vossos A; O'Dean SM; Sulikowski D; Rantala MJ; Brooks RC
Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2018 Jul; 93():90-102. PubMed ID: 29705577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Similarities in human visual and declared measures of preference for opposite-sex faces.
Griffey JA; Little AC
Exp Psychol; 2014; 61(4):301-9. PubMed ID: 24351988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
