These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25414676)

  • 1. Probability cueing of distractor locations: both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction.
    Goschy H; Bakos S; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1195. PubMed ID: 25414676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Post-capture processes contribute to statistical learning of distractor locations in visual search.
    Sauter M; Hanning NM; Liesefeld HR; Müller HJ
    Cortex; 2021 Feb; 135():108-126. PubMed ID: 33360756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Region-based shielding of visual search from salient distractors: Target detection is impaired with same- but not different-dimension distractors.
    Sauter M; Liesefeld HR; Zehetleitner M; Müller HJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):622-642. PubMed ID: 29299850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning to suppress salient distractors in the target dimension: Region-based inhibition is persistent and transfers to distractors in a nontarget dimension.
    Sauter M; Liesefeld HR; Müller HJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Nov; 45(11):2080-2097. PubMed ID: 30688477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering.
    Ferrante O; Patacca A; Di Caro V; Della Libera C; Santandrea E; Chelazzi L
    Cortex; 2018 May; 102():67-95. PubMed ID: 29096874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities in a visual detection task.
    van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Feb; 84(2):450-458. PubMed ID: 34773244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Learning to suppress likely distractor locations in visual search is driven by the local distractor frequency.
    Allenmark F; Zhang B; Shi Z; Müller HJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1250-1278. PubMed ID: 36107665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. No reliable effect of task-irrelevant cross-modal statistical regularities on distractor suppression.
    Jagini KK; Sunny MM
    Cortex; 2023 Apr; 161():77-92. PubMed ID: 36913824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. More capture, more suppression: Distractor suppression due to statistical regularities is determined by the magnitude of attentional capture.
    Failing M; Theeuwes J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Feb; 27(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 31848910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture independent of search strategy.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1763-1774. PubMed ID: 29968080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How to inhibit a distractor location? Statistical learning versus active, top-down suppression.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 May; 80(4):860-870. PubMed ID: 29476331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical Learning of Frequent Distractor Locations in Visual Search Involves Regional Signal Suppression in Early Visual Cortex.
    Zhang B; Weidner R; Allenmark F; Bertleff S; Fink GR; Shi Z; Müller HJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2022 Jun; 32(13):2729-2744. PubMed ID: 34727169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Probability cueing of singleton-distractor locations in visual search: Priority-map- versus dimension-based inhibition?
    Zhang B; Allenmark F; Liesefeld HR; Shi Z; Müller HJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1146-1163. PubMed ID: 31144860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical learning of target and distractor spatial probability shape a common attentional priority computation.
    Ferrante O; Chelazzi L; Santandrea E
    Cortex; 2023 Dec; 169():95-117. PubMed ID: 37866062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intertrial priming due to distractor repetition is eliminated in homogeneous contexts.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):1935-47. PubMed ID: 27165171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cueing effects of target location probability and repetition.
    Kabata T; Matsumoto E
    Vision Res; 2012 Nov; 73():23-9. PubMed ID: 23022549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distractor suppression leads to reduced flanker interference.
    Ivanov Y; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):624-636. PubMed ID: 33269439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What is the Role of Spatial Attention in Statistical Learning During Visual Search?
    Golan A; Ramgir A; Lamy D
    J Cogn; 2024; 7(1):52. PubMed ID: 39005952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Distractors less salient than targets capture attention rather than producing non-spatial filtering costs.
    Koch AI; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Sep; 144(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 23747508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.