470 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25415700)
1. Unenhanced CT for the diagnosis of minimal-fat renal angiomyolipoma.
Schieda N; Hodgdon T; El-Khodary M; Flood TA; McInnes MD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Dec; 203(6):1236-41. PubMed ID: 25415700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Histogram analysis of small solid renal masses: differentiating minimal fat angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma.
Chaudhry HS; Davenport MS; Nieman CM; Ho LM; Neville AM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Feb; 198(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 22268181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differentiation of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma From Other Subtypes and Fat-Poor Angiomyolipoma by Use of Quantitative Enhancement Measurement During Three-Phase MDCT.
Kim SH; Kim CS; Kim MJ; Cho JY; Cho SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jan; 206(1):W21-8. PubMed ID: 26700359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are there useful CT features to differentiate renal cell carcinoma from lipid-poor renal angiomyolipoma?
Yang CW; Shen SH; Chang YH; Chung HJ; Wang JH; Lin AT; Chen KK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1017-28. PubMed ID: 24147472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at biphasic helical CT.
Kim JK; Park SY; Shon JH; Cho KS
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):677-84. PubMed ID: 14990834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat and non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: differentiation on MDCT using classification and regression tree analysis-based algorithm.
Woo S; Cho JY; Kim SH; Kim SY
Acta Radiol; 2014 Dec; 55(10):1258-69. PubMed ID: 24259298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Qualitative and quantitative MDCT features for differentiating clear cell renal cell carcinoma from other solid renal cortical masses.
Lee-Felker SA; Felker ER; Tan N; Margolis DJ; Young JR; Sayre J; Raman SS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Nov; 203(5):W516-24. PubMed ID: 25341166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CT histogram analysis: differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging.
Kim JY; Kim JK; Kim N; Cho KS
Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):472-9. PubMed ID: 18094264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from papillary renal cell carcinoma by helical CT.
Zhang YY; Luo S; Liu Y; Xu RT
Clin Radiol; 2013 Apr; 68(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 23321146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pixel distribution analysis: can it be used to distinguish clear cell carcinomas from angiomyolipomas with minimal fat?
Catalano OA; Samir AE; Sahani DV; Hahn PF
Radiology; 2008 Jun; 247(3):738-46. PubMed ID: 18413886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Solid Renal Cell Carcinoma Measuring Water Attenuation (-10 to 20 HU) on Unenhanced CT.
Schieda N; Vakili M; Dilauro M; Hodgdon T; Flood TA; Shabana WM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Dec; 205(6):1215-21. PubMed ID: 26587928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation of morphological and enhancement features from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging.
Sung CK; Kim SH; Woo S; Moon MH; Kim SY; Kim SH; Cho JY
Acta Radiol; 2016 Sep; 57(9):1114-22. PubMed ID: 26663389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Small (< 4 cm) Renal Masses: Differentiation of Angiomyolipoma Without Visible Fat From Renal Cell Carcinoma Using Unenhanced and Contrast-Enhanced CT.
Takahashi N; Leng S; Kitajima K; Gomez-Cardona D; Thapa P; Carter RE; Leibovich BC; Sasiwimonphan K; Sasaguri K; Kawashima A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Dec; 205(6):1194-202. PubMed ID: 26587925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Small (< 4 cm) Renal Tumors With Predominantly Low Signal Intensity on T2-Weighted Images: Differentiation of Minimal-Fat Angiomyolipoma From Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Park JJ; Kim CK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jan; 208(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 27824487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differentiation of Renal Tumor Histotypes: Usefulness of Quantitative Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.
Lu Q; Huang BJ; Xue LY; Fan PL; Wang WP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Sep; 205(3):W335-42. PubMed ID: 26295670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does Computer-Aided Diagnosis Permit Differentiation of Angiomyolipoma Without Visible Fat From Renal Cell Carcinoma on MDCT?
Lee Y; Kim JK; Shim W; Sung YS; Cho KS; Shin JH; Kim MH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Sep; 205(3):W305-12. PubMed ID: 26295666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat on MDCT: can counts of negative-attenuation pixels aid diagnosis?
Simpfendorfer C; Herts BR; Motta-Ramirez GA; Lockwood DS; Zhou M; Leiber M; Remer EM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Feb; 192(2):438-43. PubMed ID: 19155407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Unenhanced CT and MRI Parameters That Can Be Used to Reliably Predict Fat-Invisible Angiomyolipoma.
Jeong CJ; Park BK; Park JJ; Kim CK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Feb; 206(2):340-7. PubMed ID: 26797361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictive Value of Chemical-Shift MRI in Distinguishing Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma From Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Minimal-Fat Angiomyolipoma.
Jhaveri KS; Elmi A; Hosseini-Nik H; Hedgire S; Evans A; Jewett M; Harisinghani M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jul; 205(1):W79-86. PubMed ID: 26102422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnosis of angiomyolipoma using computed tomography-region of interest < or =-10 HU or 4 adjacent pixels < or =-10 HU are recommended as the diagnostic thresholds.
Simpson E; Patel U
Clin Radiol; 2006 May; 61(5):410-6. PubMed ID: 16679114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
