283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25417003)
1. Metal-induced artifacts in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of a biodegradable magnesium alloy versus titanium and stainless steel controls.
Filli L; Luechinger R; Frauenfelder T; Beck S; Guggenberger R; Farshad-Amacker N; Andreisek G
Skeletal Radiol; 2015 Jun; 44(6):849-56. PubMed ID: 25417003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biodegradable magnesium Herbert screw - image quality and artifacts with radiography, CT and MRI.
Sonnow L; Könneker S; Vogt PM; Wacker F; von Falck C
BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Feb; 17(1):16. PubMed ID: 28196474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of MR issues for the latest standard brands of orthopedic metal implants: plates and screws.
Zou YF; Chu B; Wang CB; Hu ZY
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 84(3):450-457. PubMed ID: 25544555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of magnetic and radiographic imaging artifact after using three types of metal rods: stainless steel, titanium, and vitallium.
Knott PT; Mardjetko SM; Kim RH; Cotter TM; Dunn MM; Patel ST; Spencer MJ; Wilson AS; Tager DS
Spine J; 2010 Sep; 10(9):789-94. PubMed ID: 20619749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Metal artifact reduction in CT, a phantom study: subjective and objective evaluation of four commercial metal artifact reduction algorithms when used on three different orthopedic metal implants.
Bolstad K; Flatabø S; Aadnevik D; Dalehaug I; Vetti N
Acta Radiol; 2018 Sep; 59(9):1110-1118. PubMed ID: 29310445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exploring metal artifact reduction using dual-energy CT with pre-metal and post-metal implant cadaver comparison: are implant specific protocols needed?
Wellenberg RHH; Donders JCE; Kloen P; Beenen LFM; Kleipool RP; Maas M; Streekstra GJ
Skeletal Radiol; 2018 Jun; 47(6):839-845. PubMed ID: 28842739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Metal Artifact Reduction in Pelvic Computed Tomography With Hip Prostheses: Comparison of Virtual Monoenergetic Extrapolations From Dual-Energy Computed Tomography and an Iterative Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm in a Phantom Study.
Higashigaito K; Angst F; Runge VM; Alkadhi H; Donati OF
Invest Radiol; 2015 Dec; 50(12):828-34. PubMed ID: 26171565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Changes realized from extended bit-depth and metal artifact reduction in CT.
Glide-Hurst C; Chen D; Zhong H; Chetty IJ
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):061711. PubMed ID: 23718590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantification of susceptibility artifacts produced on high-field magnetic resonance images by various biomaterials used for neurosurgical implants. Technical note.
Matsuura H; Inoue T; Konno H; Sasaki M; Ogasawara K; Ogawa A
J Neurosurg; 2002 Dec; 97(6):1472-5. PubMed ID: 12507151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of CT imaging artifacts from craniomaxillofacial internal fixation devices.
Fiala TG; Novelline RA; Yaremchuk MJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1993 Dec; 92(7):1227-32. PubMed ID: 8248397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Metallic spinal artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging.
Vaccaro AR; Chesnut RM; Scuderi G; Healy JF; Massie JB; Garfin SR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Jun; 19(11):1237-42. PubMed ID: 8073315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic resonance imaging susceptibility artifacts in the cervical vertebrae and spinal cord related to monocortical screw-polymethylmethacrylate implants in canine cadavers.
Jones BG; Fosgate GT; Green EM; Habing AM; Hettlich BF
Am J Vet Res; 2017 Apr; 78(4):458-464. PubMed ID: 28346006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cranio-orbital reconstruction: safety and image quality of metallic implants on CT and MRI scanning.
Sullivan PK; Smith JF; Rozzelle AA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1994 Oct; 94(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 7938281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is galvanic corrosion between titanium alloy and stainless steel spinal implants a clinical concern?
Serhan H; Slivka M; Albert T; Kwak SD
Spine J; 2004; 4(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 15246296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Titanium hip implants for improved magnetic resonance and computed tomography examinations.
Ebraheim NA; Savolaine ER; Zeiss J; Jackson WT
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Feb; (275):194-8. PubMed ID: 1735213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a new biodegradable operative clip made of a magnesium alloy: Evaluation of its safety and tolerability for canine cholecystectomy.
Yoshida T; Fukumoto T; Urade T; Kido M; Toyama H; Asari S; Ajiki T; Ikeo N; Mukai T; Ku Y
Surgery; 2017 Jun; 161(6):1553-1560. PubMed ID: 28159116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Material-Dependent Implant Artifact Reduction Using SEMAC-VAT and MAVRIC: A Prospective MRI Phantom Study.
Filli L; Jud L; Luechinger R; Nanz D; Andreisek G; Runge VM; Kozerke S; Farshad-Amacker NA
Invest Radiol; 2017 Jun; 52(6):381-387. PubMed ID: 28092272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. SEMAC-VAT and MSVAT-SPACE sequence strategies for metal artifact reduction in 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging.
Ai T; Padua A; Goerner F; Nittka M; Gugala Z; Jadhav S; Trelles M; Johnson RF; Lindsey RW; Li X; Runge VM
Invest Radiol; 2012 May; 47(5):267-76. PubMed ID: 22266987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Novel biodegradable magnesium alloy clips compared with titanium clips for hepatectomy in a rat model.
Urade T; Yoshida T; Ikeo N; Naka K; Kido M; Toyama H; Ueno K; Tanaka M; Mukai T; Fukumoto T
BMC Surg; 2019 Sep; 19(1):130. PubMed ID: 31500601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Aneurysm clip MR artifacts. Titanium versus stainless steel and influence of imaging parameters.
Burtscher IM; Owman T; Romner B; Ståhlberg F; Holtås S
Acta Radiol; 1998 Jan; 39(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 9498874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
