These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25417853)

  • 1. Fine-mapping additive and dominant SNP effects using group-LASSO and fractional resample model averaging.
    Sabourin J; Nobel AB; Valdar W
    Genet Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 39(2):77-88. PubMed ID: 25417853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reprioritizing genetic associations in hit regions using LASSO-based resample model averaging.
    Valdar W; Sabourin J; Nobel A; Holmes CC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 36(5):451-62. PubMed ID: 22549815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genome-wide prediction using Bayesian additive regression trees.
    Waldmann P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):42. PubMed ID: 27286957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prioritizing genetic variants in GWAS with lasso using permutation-assisted tuning.
    Yang S; Wen J; Eckert ST; Wang Y; Liu DJ; Wu R; Li R; Zhan X
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Jun; 36(12):3811-3817. PubMed ID: 32246825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accounting for dominance to improve genomic evaluations of dairy cows for fertility and milk production traits.
    Aliloo H; Pryce JE; González-Recio O; Cocks BG; Hayes BJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Feb; 48():8. PubMed ID: 26830030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Non-additive genetic variation in growth, carcass and fertility traits of beef cattle.
    Bolormaa S; Pryce JE; Zhang Y; Reverter A; Barendse W; Hayes BJ; Goddard ME
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):26. PubMed ID: 25880217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A genome-wide association study reveals additive and dominance effects on growth and fatness traits in large white pigs.
    Yang W; Wu J; Yu J; Zheng X; Kang H; Wang Z; Zhang S; Zhou L; Liu J
    Anim Genet; 2021 Oct; 52(5):749-753. PubMed ID: 34403536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of markers with non-additive effects on milk yield and fertility in Holstein and Jersey cows.
    Aliloo H; Pryce JE; González-Recio O; Cocks BG; Hayes BJ
    BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():89. PubMed ID: 26193888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficient approximation of P-value of the maximum of correlated tests, with applications to genome-wide association studies.
    Li Q; Zheng G; Li Z; Yu K
    Ann Hum Genet; 2008 May; 72(Pt 3):397-406. PubMed ID: 18318785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. One degree of freedom for dominance in indirect association studies.
    Chapman J; Clayton D
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Apr; 31(3):261-71. PubMed ID: 17266117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ridge, Lasso and Bayesian additive-dominance genomic models.
    Azevedo CF; de Resende MD; E Silva FF; Viana JM; Valente MS; Resende MF; Muñoz P
    BMC Genet; 2015 Aug; 16():105. PubMed ID: 26303864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detecting low frequent loss-of-function alleles in genome wide association studies with red hair color as example.
    Liu F; Struchalin MV; Duijn Kv; Hofman A; Uitterlinden AG; Duijn Cv; Aulchenko YS; Kayser M
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(11):e28145. PubMed ID: 22140526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An efficient unified model for genome-wide association studies and genomic selection.
    Li H; Su G; Jiang L; Bao Z
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):64. PubMed ID: 28836943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using Bayes model averaging to leverage both gene main effects and G ×  E interactions to identify genomic regions in genome-wide association studies.
    Moss LC; Gauderman WJ; Lewinger JP; Conti DV
    Genet Epidemiol; 2019 Mar; 43(2):150-165. PubMed ID: 30456811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. iGWAS: Integrative Genome-Wide Association Studies of Genetic and Genomic Data for Disease Susceptibility Using Mediation Analysis.
    Huang YT; Liang L; Moffatt MF; Cookson WO; Lin X
    Genet Epidemiol; 2015 Jul; 39(5):347-56. PubMed ID: 25997986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Endometrial vezatin and its association with endometriosis risk.
    Holdsworth-Carson SJ; Fung JN; Luong HT; Sapkota Y; Bowdler LM; Wallace L; Teh WT; Powell JE; Girling JE; Healey M; Montgomery GW; Rogers PA
    Hum Reprod; 2016 May; 31(5):999-1013. PubMed ID: 27005890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robust genetic model-based SNP-set association test using CauchyGM.
    Kim Y; Chi YY; Shen J; Zou F
    Bioinformatics; 2023 Jan; 39(1):. PubMed ID: 36383169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genomic BLUP including additive and dominant variation in purebreds and F1 crossbreds, with an application in pigs.
    Vitezica ZG; Varona L; Elsen JM; Misztal I; Herring W; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jan; 48():6. PubMed ID: 26825279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genome-wide association study and accuracy of genomic prediction for teat number in Duroc pigs using genotyping-by-sequencing.
    Tan C; Wu Z; Ren J; Huang Z; Liu D; He X; Prakapenka D; Zhang R; Li N; Da Y; Hu X
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Mar; 49(1):35. PubMed ID: 28356075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of Additive, Dominance, and Imprinting Genetic Variance Using Genomic Data.
    Lopes MS; Bastiaansen JW; Janss L; Knol EF; Bovenhuis H
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Oct; 5(12):2629-37. PubMed ID: 26438289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.