These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25417986)

  • 1. Standard setting in OSCEs: a borderline approach.
    Rajiah K; Veettil SK; Kumar S
    Clin Teach; 2014 Dec; 11(7):551-6. PubMed ID: 25417986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Calibration of communication skills items in OSCE checklists according to the MAAS-Global.
    Setyonugroho W; Kropmans T; Kennedy KM; Stewart B; van Dalen J
    Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Jan; 99(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 26508594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Who will pass the dental OSCE? Comparison of the Angoff and the borderline regression standard setting methods.
    Schoonheim-Klein M; Muijtjens A; Habets L; Manogue M; van der Vleuten C; van der Velden U
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2009 Aug; 13(3):162-71. PubMed ID: 19630935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Standard Setting Methods for Pass/Fail Decisions on High-Stakes Objective Structured Clinical Examinations: A Validity Study.
    Yousuf N; Violato C; Zuberi RW
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(3):280-91. PubMed ID: 26158330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development and evaluation of a spiral model of assessing EBM competency using OSCEs in undergraduate medical education.
    Kumaravel B; Stewart C; Ilic D
    BMC Med Educ; 2021 Apr; 21(1):204. PubMed ID: 33838686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A resource efficient and reliable standard setting method for OSCEs: Borderline regression method using standardized patients as sole raters in clinical case encounters with medical students.
    Milan FB; Grochowalski JH
    Med Teach; 2022 Aug; 44(8):878-885. PubMed ID: 35234562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The objective structured clinical examination: can physician-examiners participate from a distance?
    Chan J; Humphrey-Murto S; Pugh DM; Su C; Wood T
    Med Educ; 2014 Apr; 48(4):441-50. PubMed ID: 24606627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. True communication skills assessment in interdepartmental OSCE stations: Standard setting using the MAAS-Global and EduG.
    Setyonugroho W; Kropmans T; Murphy R; Hayes P; van Dalen J; Kennedy KM
    Patient Educ Couns; 2018 Jan; 101(1):147-151. PubMed ID: 28838631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factor analysis can be a useful standard setting tool in a high stakes OSCE assessment.
    Chesser AM; Laing MR; Miedzybrodzka ZH; Brittenden J; Heys SD
    Med Educ; 2004 Aug; 38(8):825-31. PubMed ID: 15271042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Done or Almost Done? Improving OSCE Checklists to Better Capture Performance in Progress Tests.
    Pugh D; Halman S; Desjardins I; Humphrey-Murto S; Wood TJ
    Teach Learn Med; 2016; 28(4):406-414. PubMed ID: 27700252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pharmacy Student Anxiety and Success With Objective Structured Clinical Examinations.
    Longyhore DS
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2017 Feb; 81(1):7. PubMed ID: 28289297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cheating in OSCEs: The Impact of Simulated Security Breaches on OSCE Performance.
    Gotzmann A; De Champlain A; Homayra F; Fotheringham A; de Vries I; Forgie M; Pugh D
    Teach Learn Med; 2017; 29(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 27603790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) to assess multiple physician competencies in postgraduate training.
    Jefferies A; Simmons B; Tabak D; McIlroy JH; Lee KS; Roukema H; Skidmore M
    Med Teach; 2007 Mar; 29(2-3):183-91. PubMed ID: 17701631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An objective structured clinical examination for evaluating psychiatric clinical clerks.
    Hodges B; Regehr G; Hanson M; McNaughton N
    Acad Med; 1997 Aug; 72(8):715-21. PubMed ID: 9282149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the reliability of a dental OSCE, using SEM: effect of different days.
    Schoonheim-Klein M; Muijtjens A; Habets L; Manogue M; Van der Vleuten C; Hoogstraten J; Van der Velden U
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2008 Aug; 12(3):131-7. PubMed ID: 18666893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnosing technical competence in six bedside procedures: comparing checklists and a global rating scale in the assessment of resident performance.
    Walzak A; Bacchus M; Schaefer JP; Zarnke K; Glow J; Brass C; McLaughlin K; Ma IW
    Acad Med; 2015 Aug; 90(8):1100-8. PubMed ID: 25881644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is There Variability in Scoring of Student Surgical OSCE Performance Based on Examiner Experience and Expertise?
    Donohoe CL; Reilly F; Donnelly S; Cahill RA
    J Surg Educ; 2020; 77(5):1202-1210. PubMed ID: 32336628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pass-Fail Decisions for Borderline Performers After a Summative Objective Structured Clinical Examination.
    Ali M; Pawluk SA; Rainkie DC; Wilby KJ
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2019 Mar; 83(2):6849. PubMed ID: 30962642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of quality and feasibility of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in preclinical dental education.
    Eberhard L; Hassel A; Bäumer A; Becker F; Beck-Mubotter J; Bömicke W; Corcodel N; Cosgarea R; Eiffler C; Giannakopoulos NN; Kraus T; Mahabadi J; Rues S; Schmitter M; Wolff D; Wege KC
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2011 Aug; 15(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 21762322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of first-year veterinary students' clinical skills using objective structured clinical examinations.
    Hecker K; Read EK; Vallevand A; Krebs G; Donszelmann D; Muelling CK; Freeman SL
    J Vet Med Educ; 2010; 37(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 21135408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.