380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25418016)
1. Use of ultrasound in predicting success of intrauterine contraceptive device insertion immediately after delivery.
Dias T; Abeykoon S; Kumarasiri S; Gunawardena C; Padeniya T; D'Antonio F
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jul; 46(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 25418016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Postpartum IUDS: keys for success.
O'Hanley K; Huber DH
Contraception; 1992 Apr; 45(4):351-61. PubMed ID: 1516367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Six-month expulsion of postplacental copper intrauterine devices placed after vaginal delivery.
Gurney EP; Sonalkar S; McAllister A; Sammel MD; Schreiber CA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):183.e1-183.e9. PubMed ID: 29870737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Current status of frameless anchored IUD for immediate intracesarean insertion.
Wildemeersch D; Goldstuck ND; Hasskamp T
Dev Period Med; 2016; 20(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 27416620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of a simplified insertion technique for intrauterine devices.
Christenson K; Lerma K; Shaw KA; Blumenthal PD
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jul; 134(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 27113419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can ultrasound predict IUD expulsion after medical abortion?
Shimoni N; Davis A; Westhoff C
Contraception; 2014 May; 89(5):434-9. PubMed ID: 24560483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ultrasound location of intrauterine devices placed at cesarean section over the first year postpartum.
Gonzalez J; Stimmel S; Rana R; Diggs AI; Pan S; Overbey J; Thomas AG; Lunde B
Contraception; 2020 Jun; 101(6):399-404. PubMed ID: 32201097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Six-week retention after postplacental copper intrauterine device placement.
Colwill AC; Schreiber CA; Sammel MD; Sonalkar S
Contraception; 2018 Mar; 97(3):215-218. PubMed ID: 29128372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transvaginal ultrasonographic assessment of the expulsion rate of intrauterine devices inserted in the immediate postpartum period: a pilot study.
Letti Müller AL; Lopes Ramos JG; Martins-Costa SH; Palma Dias RS; Valério EG; Hammes LS; Glitz CL; Zucatto AE; Vettori DV; Magalhães JA
Contraception; 2005 Sep; 72(3):192-5. PubMed ID: 16102554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Twelve-month contraceptive continuation and repeat pregnancy among young mothers choosing postdelivery contraceptive implants or postplacental intrauterine devices.
Cohen R; Sheeder J; Arango N; Teal SB; Tocce K
Contraception; 2016 Feb; 93(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 26475368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical outcomes of early postplacental insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices.
Celen S; Möröy P; Sucak A; Aktulay A; Danişman N
Contraception; 2004 Apr; 69(4):279-82. PubMed ID: 15033401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intrauterine device placement at 3 versus 6 weeks postpartum: a randomized trial.
Baldwin MK; Edelman AB; Lim JY; Nichols MD; Bednarek PH; Jensen JT
Contraception; 2016 Apr; 93(4):356-363. PubMed ID: 26686914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Decision Analysis Model of 1-Year Effectiveness of Intended Postplacental Compared With Intended Delayed Postpartum Intrauterine Device Insertion.
Sonalkar S; Hunter T; Gurney EP; McAllister A; Schreiber CA
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 132(5):1211-1221. PubMed ID: 30303909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Postplacental insertion of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device after cesarean delivery vs. delayed insertion: a randomized controlled trial.
Whitaker AK; Endres LK; Mistretta SQ; Gilliam ML
Contraception; 2014 Jun; 89(6):534-9. PubMed ID: 24457061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Immediate postplacental insertion of a copper intrauterine device: a pilot study to evaluate expulsion rate by mode of delivery.
Sucak A; Ozcan S; Çelen Ş; Çağlar T; Göksu G; Danışman N
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Sep; 15():202. PubMed ID: 26330364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Immediate postpartum intrauterine device and implant program outcomes: a prospective analysis.
Eggebroten JL; Sanders JN; Turok DK
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 217(1):51.e1-51.e7. PubMed ID: 28342716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective cohort study comparing expulsion after postplacental insertion: the levonorgestrel versus the copper intrauterine device.
Hinz EK; Murthy A; Wang B; Ryan N; Ades V
Contraception; 2019 Aug; 100(2):101-105. PubMed ID: 31108053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A pilot clinical trial of ultrasound-guided postplacental insertion of a levonorgestrel intrauterine device.
Hayes JL; Cwiak C; Goedken P; Zieman M
Contraception; 2007 Oct; 76(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 17900440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Six-month and 1-year continuation rates following postpartum insertion of implants and intrauterine devices.
Woo I; Seifert S; Hendricks D; Jamshidi RM; Burke AE; Fox MC
Contraception; 2015 Dec; 92(6):532-5. PubMed ID: 26408376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
