These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25418062)

  • 1. Deriving field-based species sensitivity distributions (f-SSDs) from stacked species distribution models (S-SDMs).
    Schipper AM; Posthuma L; de Zwart D; Huijbregts MA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Dec; 48(24):14464-71. PubMed ID: 25418062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How to assess species richness along single environmental gradients? Implications of potential versus realized species distributions.
    van Goethem TM; Huijbregts MA; Wamelink GW; Schipper AM
    Environ Pollut; 2015 May; 200():120-5. PubMed ID: 25705854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Deriving Field-Based Ecological Risks for Bird Species.
    Hoondert RPJ; Hilbers JP; Hendriks AJ; Huijbregts MAJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Mar; 52(6):3716-3726. PubMed ID: 29484892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The definition of species richness used by species sensitivity distributions approximates observed effects of salinity on stream macroinvertebrates.
    Kefford BJ; Marchant R; Schäfer RB; Metzeling L; Dunlop JE; Choy SC; Goonan P
    Environ Pollut; 2011 Jan; 159(1):302-310. PubMed ID: 20932614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. "Quantifying the precision of ecological risk: Misunderstandings and errors in the methods for assessment factors versus species sensitivity distributions".
    Belanger SE; Carr GJ
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2020 Jul; 198():110684. PubMed ID: 32408188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Habitat availability and gene flow influence diverging local population trajectories under scenarios of climate change: a place-based approach.
    Schwalm D; Epps CW; Rodhouse TJ; Monahan WB; Castillo JA; Ray C; Jeffress MR
    Glob Chang Biol; 2016 Apr; 22(4):1572-84. PubMed ID: 26667878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Novel model coupling approach for resilience analysis of coastal plant communities.
    Schibalski A; Körner K; Maier M; Jeltsch F; Schröder B
    Ecol Appl; 2018 Sep; 28(6):1640-1654. PubMed ID: 29862603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting species distributions and community composition using satellite remote sensing predictors.
    Pinto-Ledezma JN; Cavender-Bares J
    Sci Rep; 2021 Aug; 11(1):16448. PubMed ID: 34385574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporally stacked bee forage species distribution modeling for flower abundance mapping.
    Patel V; Boruff B; Biggs E; Pauli N; Dixon DJ
    MethodsX; 2023 Dec; 11():102327. PubMed ID: 37674866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models to predict amphibian species richness patterns.
    Pineda E; Lobo JM
    J Anim Ecol; 2009 Jan; 78(1):182-90. PubMed ID: 18771504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Application of species distribution models in the prediction of marine potential habitat: A review].
    Yang XL; Yang CJ; Hu CY; Zhang XM
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2017 Jun; 28(6):2063-2072. PubMed ID: 29745172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Niche variability and its consequences for species distribution modeling.
    Michel MJ; Knouft JH
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e44932. PubMed ID: 22970325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unpacking the mechanisms captured by a correlative species distribution model to improve predictions of climate refugia.
    Briscoe NJ; Kearney MR; Taylor CA; Wintle BA
    Glob Chang Biol; 2016 Jul; 22(7):2425-39. PubMed ID: 26960136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deriving site-specific sediment quality guidelines for Hong Kong marine environments using field-based species sensitivity distributions.
    Kwok KW; Bjorgesaeter A; Leung KM; Lui GC; Gray JS; Shin PK; Lam PK
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2008 Jan; 27(1):226-34. PubMed ID: 18092863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of species sensitivity distributions for wildlife using interspecies toxicity correlation models.
    Awkerman JA; Raimondo S; Barron MG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 May; 42(9):3447-52. PubMed ID: 18522132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Model uncertainties do not affect observed patterns of species richness in the Amazon.
    Sales LP; Neves OV; De Marco P; Loyola R
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0183785. PubMed ID: 29023503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the Interpretations of Joint Modeling in Community Ecology.
    Poggiato G; Münkemüller T; Bystrova D; Arbel J; Clark JS; Thuiller W
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2021 May; 36(5):391-401. PubMed ID: 33618936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can Species Distribution Models Aid Bioassessment when Reference Sites are Lacking? Tests Based on Freshwater Fishes.
    Labay BJ; Hendrickson DA; Cohen AE; Bonner TH; King RS; Kleinsasser LJ; Linam GW; Winemiller KO
    Environ Manage; 2015 Oct; 56(4):835-46. PubMed ID: 26092052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Convolutional neural networks improve species distribution modelling by capturing the spatial structure of the environment.
    Deneu B; Servajean M; Bonnet P; Botella C; Munoz F; Joly A
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Apr; 17(4):e1008856. PubMed ID: 33872302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Linking Dynamic Habitat Selection with Wading Bird Foraging Distributions across Resource Gradients.
    Beerens JM; Noonburg EG; Gawlik DE
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0128182. PubMed ID: 26107386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.